which one should i read first, and why?
>>8110227
yes
nietzsche is trash, ramblings of a schizophrenic
>>8110227
I'm just finishing Beyond Good and Evil.
It's terrible. Nietzsche's writing style is quirky as fuck; you can just imagine him fidgeting, blurting out, pre-emptively bouncing off the walls of the Basel Mental Asylum where he would later stay until his death. That said, it might be the translator's fault.
He had a couple of good ideas, nothing mind-blowing though. The actual ideas he's championed for (Übermensch, morality that is 'beyond Good and Evil', etc) are terrible.
I could imagine a good debate about just 'who' his prophesied 'New Philosophers' are (hopefully not those Post-Modernist/Structuralist hacks), or if they've even appeared yet, but that's about it.
Schopenhauer was better. Hoping to de-spook myself with Max.
![Beyond-good-and-evil-2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ChkNmco.jpg "Beyond-good-and-evil-2[1].jpg")
>>8110246
>I'm just finishing Beyond Good and Evil.
>It's terrible
that's a great game you fucking pleb
>>8110255
>>8110246
He somehow managed to break the 4th wall with his questions, which is funny as that's what he's doing by definition.
Nietzsche had one good idea: predicted nihilism to the masses
>>8110307
We solved it with materialism/consumerism, so it's no biggy!
>>8110321
Nha, that's exactly the "last men's nihilism": only caring for comfort and happiness
