who /LemonySnicket/ here
>>7741811
my nigga
>>7741815
MEMEN MORI
Poetry is just real life shitposting and anyone who argues is either a poet or a shitposter
>>7741784
>implying i can't be both
>>7741784
the spectrum goes like this:
philosophy-----literature------poetry
and if you can't into all three you don't deserve to post here.
what you're saying with your shitpost, OP, is that you don't understand poetry, and therefore are upset at it. that's pleb shit my bru hope u feel bad
does that make your post poetry?
So, how many times have you read it?
>third read right here
Have you gotten the true meaning of it?
have you touched the face of God yet?
bought it purely for display tbqhwyf
>>7741716
To be quite honest with you... fuck?
>>7741742
fampai
>1st person plural narration
>narration
>second person narration
>>7741679
I was on the bus and there was a menopause age woman reading Marc levy
>"you plunged into his eyes, never regretting your total love"
>"your father was there, he came for your wedding"
I kicked her
How do you get to the point where you can write consistently good prose without editing neurotically?
When you stop posting on /lit/ for once
You don't. Writing is work, hard work.
Write with your ears.
Is there a more anti-pornography writer than this man? GR, Inherent Vice, Bleeding Edge are the most anti-pornography works I've ever read.
David Wallace
pornography can be seen as the "entertainment"
>>7741653
sounds like a weak misreading but I'll take it
Pynchon definitely has a hog
Is Man Seeking Woman /lit-core/?
How is the novel for anyone who has read it, any major differences from the TV show?
No, it's just a surreal dating comedy.
>>7741573
>watching TV series
>condom holder on the nightstand
alpha af senpai
>tfw infinite jest was never translated into my language
You're not missing out on much.
Well you know English you cumrag
>>7741564
infinite jest kinda sucked desu
What is the best plot that was wasted on bad prose, and vice versa?
pic unrelated
>reading for plot
>reading for prose
>reading for themes
>reading for fun
>reading for intellectual development
>reading
Top pleb
>>7741548
>reading
>reee
>/r/eddit
the bible
1. Plug in e-reader
2. Open calibre
3. post your load
I want to load on her chest if you know what I mean.
Ok now what
Has anyone read this? Its not available anywhere in digital and I'm thinking of purchasing.
Also, anyone have any other Turkish/Turkic/Central Asian lit recs?
Mehmet, My son.
If you wouldn't let Walt Whitman lie you down and tongue your penis/masturbate you into a karezza induced orgasm then you don't know SHIT about literature.
http://www.leylandpublications.com/exc_gaysuccess.html
>>7741386
>Whitman
>Not the BBC who will reverse racism your shit until you weep
>>7741398
What do you mean by 'reverse racism'? Isn't that that process that allowed that very negro to attain higher education known as affirmative action?
>>7741425
No it's when he tops you while posting about it to his black followers on social media
"It should be forbidden to read the Zhuangzi before 30 years old, because in life one has to read certain books and Zhuangzi is a book so wonderful that anything you read after will seem deceiving" Jacques PIMPANEAU
I found it being 28 and I can say this is true. This nigga is the chinese Witgenstein only that its not just philososphy.
Go read it NOW and throw all your other books.
>"Once upon a time, Zhuang Zhou dreamed he was a butterfly, a butterfly flitting about happily enjoying himself. He did not know that he was Zhou. Suddenly he awoke, and was palpably Zhou. He did not know whether he was Zhou, who had dreamed of being a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming that he was Zhou. Now, there must be a difference between Zhou and the butterfly. This is called the transformation of things."
MOM'S GONNA FREAK
But I'm not 30
>>7741287
Great quote OP. Zhuangzi alone is worth learning Chinese for.
Paul Rouzer's New Practical Primer of Literary Chinese culminates in the reading of a whole chapter from Zhuangzi.
Experience of a lifetime.
INTERVIEWER
What do you make of all this recent talk of the “canonical problem”?
BLOOM
It is no more than a reflection of current academic and social politics in the United States. The old test for what makes a work canonical is if it has engendered strong readings that come after it, whether as overt interpretations or implicitly interpretive forms. There’s no way the gender and power boys and girls, or the New Historicists, or any of the current set are going to give us new canonical works, any more than all the agitation of feminist writing or nowadays...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7741286
he overestimated the normies. the colleges are a breeding ground, and they have yet to be cleansed.
No it came back. There was a rise of PC culture in the mid 80's lasted into the first part of the 90's.
>>7741286
While American PC Culture reeks (IE the current Oscar scandal where blacks are all but saying there must be a black actor voted in to keep everything fair, regardless of quality), things like the Man Booker International are a good thing.
For all that good Harold reads, it mostly seems to be high English. The Man Booker International may well seek to overturn canon as Camus did in the 60s and 70s by showing the American public foreign film, or at least I hope so.
Also, this wave of PCism is dying, see...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Best Latin translation for harry potter?
Carpere Urnae
More shots
ERAT AMICUM SIBI!!