ITT: post yfw Trump is the most pro lgbt republican candidate.
>>5285488
Even if he's pro-LGBT -- and I really doubt that he is -- the party behind him would just as soon have us all rounded up and gassed. Its a no-win situation.
>>5285488
>>5285534
I guess you're going to vote for the party that believes the Uber limo service needs to be limited so that it doesn't outcompete the shitty taxi drivers' union, and the party that believes having the ability to selectively search for your preferred race your partner on grindr should be banned.
>>5285581
Wasn't planning on it, no. Like I said, it's a no-win situation.
>>5285534
Hes one of the only ones to say that gay marriage is the law and he's not going to do anything to change that.
The others have said all sorts of crazy shit from "repeal the law" to "make all marriages null"
>>5285590
What has Trump said against homosexuals? Can you name one thing?
>>5285488
The thing about Trump is he's a democrat and has been for decades. He's donated to loads of democrat candidates in the past.
Its just infinitely easier for him to out compete republicans, and his immigration and financial opinions are more right wing
>>5285619
He's popular because the rest of the republicans have been trying to be democrats-lite for years without success. They have been pushing anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage but otherwise the two parties were identical more or less.
Now that Trump is in the lead, people feel like they actually have a choice now that will significantly affect the political landscape, away from the monolithic campaign donators who control most politicians.
>>5285638
The only other fucking demographic is trans people. Theyre 0.3% of the population, whereas gays are something like 9%
Calm your underdeveloped, pill induced, breasts
>>5285662
What, so the fact that there are only 700,000 of us means that we're not entitled to wanting politicians that don't treat us like garbage? We get to choose between people who openly hate us and people who promise us the world but conveniently forget about us until the next election.
>>5285646
>he rest of the republicans have been trying to be democrats-lite for years
Where the fuck are you getting an insane idea like that?
>>5285686
Caitlyn Jenner is voting republican.
>>5285686
Youre being such a melodramatic little drama queen. Get over yourself, the world isnt out to get you. Democrats are your best bet, theyve already made trans health care basically free. Fuck off.
>>5285726
>In what fucking parallel universe?
Obomo Care covers it. Enjoy.
>>5285638
What has Donald Trump said against transsexuals? Name one thing.
>>5285734
Trump is one man. Voting for him means giving more power to the GOP, and the GOP are not our friends. A Republican in the White House combined with a GOP-controlled Congress = bye bye, social reforms!
>>5285696
Yeah, but she doesn't seem to have much in common with trans people. She's a celebrity so she can pretty much buy her way out of any issue that affects trans people. She's never going to have to worry about being unable to afford transition, kicked out or abused by family, denied work or housing for being trans, etc.
>>5285534
>le republicans are the third reich meme
epic
>>5285748
>The GOP are not our friends
You are a bunch of very expensive, unstable, and insane individuals who have a suicide rate so high that it's economically illiterate to give you tens of thousands of dollars worth of surgery and hormones out of the pocket of taxpayers.
Big Pharma loves you, though. You're a huge cash cow for them due to how many meds transsexuals need to take.
>>5285751
>Jenner needs to check her privilege
Fuck you and fuck this demented way of thinking. You're saying that all transsexuals can be happy and that their problems can be solved if each transsexual had tons of money?
I thought it was all a self-identification issue.
>>5285748
what kind of social reforms are you looking for? let me guess, something that is inherently inequal, but done in the name of equality
>>5285785
>Big Pharma loves you, though. You're a huge cash cow for them due to how many meds transsexuals need to take.
Not really. Given the rarity of trans people, the amount of meds they have to buy really doesn't add up to much on that level.
>>5285801
>You're saying that all transsexuals can be happy and that their problems can be solved if each transsexual had tons of money?
Uh, yeah? Is there any issue affecting trans people that money doesn't solve? Sure, money itself won't cure dysphoria, but it makes it a lot easier to get HRT and surgery. And you'd never be stuck living in a place where people are killed for being trans or where it's hard to get HRT.
>>5285488
>>5285850
yet bruce will always look like a cross dressing dude
>>5285833
Anti-discrimination protections (which is what you seem to be implying) aren't inherently unequal. Like, if there's a law protecting trans people from being fired ON THE BASIS OF THEIR GENDER, there's no reason why cis people shouldn't receive the same protection. The only reason laws aren't passed specifically to protect cis people is that they're generally not discriminated against the way trans people are.
>>5285884
its because many people value freedom of association and don't want to live with PC police being able to put them in jail
It feels like he's going lunatic with this muslim thing. Becoming the president isn't his first goal now and it will bite him back.
>>5285896
That doesn't mean it's unequal though. Suppose there was a law that said anyone who insulted another on the basis of their race or gender would be executed without trial. Sure, it would be an extreme infringement on our freedoms, but it wouldn't be unequal since it applies to everyone.
>>5285896
Lots of people don't want to go to jail. Does that mean that we should legalize murder and rape?
>>5285932
freedom to murder isn't an established right and it infringes on other people's rights
Non-American here, amused that you guys seriously consider electing a meme as your president. One day I need to visit US.
>>5285910
Yes, that all-important American Muslim vote (1%) will surely sink him.
Idiot.
>>5285955
well the alternatives are a socialist and a woman who has been caught lying over and over and has no appeal beyond her name
>>5285964
Not entire world is /pol/, what he's doing right now is very irrational even for a populist.
>>5285980
No but you don't deserve them either to be honest
>>5285980
>do we have any good options?
>>5285980
if its their home they cannot be forcibly removed from their property
that's literally illegal
are you referring to parents kicking out 18 year olds?
>>5285488
I don't hate him like most liberals, but I have no idea what he's actually about.
Every speech is like a hypo-manic drug rant. I can't even understand how he made money talking like that.
>>5286515
>if its their home they cannot be forcibly removed from their property
>that's literally illegal
I've heard of landlords throwing out trans people, which I would think is functionally equivalent to theft.
>are you referring to parents kicking out 18 year olds?
That's also something I've heard of (and even it happening to younger people) but I don't know if there's any basic right that is in violation of.
>>5286576
Real estate is the easiest way to become rich and it's even easier when you start off being born into a rich family.
>>5286624
>I've heard of landlords throwing out trans people, which I would think is functionally equivalent to theft.
if its violation of contract, then sure
that's also illegal
>>5287171
>that's also illegal
That depends on the city really.
>>5287158
if its so easy, why are none the top 10 richest people in the world from real estate
if its so easy, why are 2/3rds of all billionaires self made?
>>5287187
>if its so easy, why are none the top 10 richest people in the world from real estate
Not that anon, but just because it's easy to become "rich" from something, doesn't mean there aren't harder, but much more profitable ways of making money.
>2/3rds of all billionaires self made?
I'd like to see a source on this.
>>5287185
dude let me tell you
if your landlord kicked you out in violation of contract, you can take him to court
and you will win
a contract is a contract
>>5287198
http://www.chicagobooth.edu/capideas/magazine/summer-2013/billionaires-self-made
absolutely
>>5287158
So wait, his family gave him seed money and he simply verbally steamrolled his way to billions?
>>5287230
and if you point out that its only the top 400 billionaires i'm gonna REE
there are 536 billionaires in the US, if all of the bottom 136 for some reason were ALL from old money, it would still be a majority self made
>>5285534
So you'll vote for the party who wants to have open boarders to people who want to round us all up and thrown off a building?
>>5287270
i know right?
>>5285662
>Calm your underdeveloped, pill induced, breasts
wow rude
>>5287270
I feel like that whole thing is exaggerated, at least as far as America is concerned. Even liberal politicians here don't seem in favor of totally unrestricted immigration, and it's not like the refugees are going to be exempt from our laws.
>>5287303
>it's not like the refugees are going to be exempt from our laws.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/yes-there-are-no-go-zones-in-europe/
>>5285619
This. He even supports LGBT protection laws. He's grew up in the business world so he knows how to get ahead. With a woman and a full on socialist running there no way a rich, white, blonde haired, blue eyed moderate could win the Dem nomination so he's pandering to the dumbest and most gullible people in the country.
>>5287358
>he's pandering to the dumbest and most gullible people in the country
actually rand paul is the one reaching out to blacks
>>5287303
It is. Open borders isn't a thing on anyone's platform in the Democratic or Republican party.
>>5287524
No, it's just what they encourage and allow.
>>5287706
Nobody does that.
>>5285488
I'm sorry anon, but evidence from absence isn't reliable. Nor will it ever.
>>5287769
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tSmxd7X9X2s
>>5287713
You calling Obama a nobody?
>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/19/obama-actions-shield-most-illegal-immigrants-from-/
OP, your shitpost assertion is as real as this character.
>>5285488
The problem is he's a fascist in every other respect. The fact that "libertarians" flock around him is a sign that our nation's political discourse has been divided down the middle by socialism and fascism with no middle ground. It's fucking appalling.
>>5288177
Facist? Hardly. Explain yourself.
>>5288194
Favors military expansion as opposed to the down sizing of the military, wants to close the border instead of open it, and is in favor of government surveillance instead of individual privacy.
>>5288177
I disagree. He's a nationalist which is exactly what we need right now.
>>5288177
We're not really socialist except Sanders and he's one in a million when it comes to American politicians. Even our democrats are conservative by the rest of the western world's standards.
>>5288251
I'm referring to the voter base, not the elected officials. Most democrats are socialists. Free higher education, single payer health care system, expansion of entitlements, and increased economic and environmental regulations that mirror the EU. Don't get me wrong, I'm an unashamed socialist, but you gotta call a duck a duck. And most every single democrat walks, quacks, looks, and fucks like a duck.
>>5288211
This is just standard conservative stuff not fascism. Also, he wants to close the border only to people who cross illegally that's what borders are for.
>>5288268
Except for Hillary ;__;
I just hope he'll build a wall so no one can get out of America and the rest of the world doesn't have to suffer anymore
>>5290255
>foreign hoards
>has native americans
toppest kek
>>5290265
I'm a tranny who is voting for Trump
>>5290341
Fuck Yeah!
>>5288211
>closing borders is fascism
When did welcoming every possible immigrant become the pinnacle of morality?
>military expansion as opposed to the down sizing of the military
The only person that wants to reduce military expenditures is Rand Paul, and look at how he's polling.
>is in favor of government surveillance instead of individual privacy
No one in either party knows anything about government surveillance with the exception of Rand Paul. He's the only one that would do something to downsize surveillance. All of the candidates are old and technologically illiterate.
>>5285534
stay cücked
