How much fetish bullshit would you put up with from a partner [insert gender here]?
On a scale from "maybe we should try that" to "swap.avi" where do you stand on the matter?
>>5267338
Not very far.
His fetishes would have to be compatible with mine, and I don't want to try some disgusting fetishes out.
Mine just asked to roleplay.
Idk wtf do
>>5267338
Dated a girl who was sub and wanted to do violent roleplay. Like, she wanted me to pretend to beat her up with a baseball bat, pretend to choke her, call her homophobic slurs. I really wasn't comfortable with it and we broke up.
Had one girl who started just wanting light bondage, but when she wanted to wear a collar and do slave roleplay I peaced out. I don't know why people see me as a dom but I just can't get into the whole BDSM concept.
Had a gf with a slight foot fetish. She loved me to wear heels or stockings when we fucked. It was weird but not that weird. We separated for unrelated reasons (didn't want to do long distance).
Anything with pissing/shitting/blood I would be automatically out.
I'd honestly probably be able to put up with a lot. I think scat is probably the only thing that's definitely off the table. Most other things I don't imagine I'd have too much of a problem with. I don't really know if I'm just easygoing or easy to manipulate.
I'm not so sure I'd be comfortable with things that would seriously degrade me, though. I'd have to really trust him to be able to do that.
It depends how attractive he is vs. the level of his fetishes. Light things like domination or CDing are fine - roleplay is probably the farthest I go. Once you start getting into weird shit like bondage or anything further than that is where I turn off.
My ex was pretty vanilla and I didn't really have to change anything for him. He was into hair and my muscles but that was it basically.
Once my 'almost a bf' asked me for a photo of my foot. ugh...
>>5267921
>Anything with pissing/shitting/blood I would be automatically out.
add in vomit or ageplay and I'm right there with you.
>>5268027
also vomit is off the table, blood i could probably deal with as long as I don't get any scars
I would be up for mainstream fetishes like bondage/whipping/feet. I wouldn't do anything that involves objects too foreign to the bedroom ie diapers/boots/goofy costumes.
I don't think that many people want to have fetish sex with someone who doesn't share their fetish as it would be embarrassing and not hot.
If you tell your partner you're not interested they will understand.
Depends on the fetish.
After all the years of beating off to all that assortment of weird porn scattered around the internet, I'm pretty open-minded about a lot of stuff myself (though compared to most people who post here, I'm as pure as an angel)
But no, I would neither want to try out something that disgusts me/creeps me out, nor would I ask my partner to accommodate to my fetishes.
If we both like the same things, it's cool, but keep the rest of it locked in your hidden porn folder please.
>>5267338
I honestly would find it interesting to meet someone who could push my limits. Once I get heated I feel like honestly anything could be hot, I guess I would only be against things that linger on past sex like injury / fluid based (yuck mess) fetishes.
>>5267338
Idk about specific things, kinda take it case by case on no or yah. But def a big no is taking shit outside the bedroom for me. Like if you're super dom that's ok we can try some kinky sex shit but if outside sex you still go on with trying to dom me nah fuck off. Like a mommy kink? Try it. Say mommy outside in public over breakfast? Nah stop.
And photos/film. I just wont' fuck with that shit on. I've thought of it and honestly the only way is if I'm in complete control of it and making money amateur style.
