US is going to start equipment in Vietnam and Cambodia as well as other Asian nations in the coming years. While most of the equipment in Vietnam and Cambodia is going to be non lethal, it paves the way for American military presence in Vietnam, something which has not been seen since the end of the Second Indochina war. In addition to that, there is the possibility of spillover effect into other nations bordering the South China sea and the possibility of increased military cooperation between Vietnam and the United States (as well as its allies).
Looks like the US is set to make amends with an old foe. And Vietnam has shown that while the past is not forgotten, the present dangers to its security means it has to make new friends.
B52's based in Saigon when?
http://thediplomat.com/2016/03/deterring-china-us-army-to-stockpile-equipment-in-cambodia-and-vietnam/
>>29292828
to start setting up equipment depots****
fuck
>>29292828
>inb4 this proves US won Vietnam
>>29292874
The US fucked up in Vietnam but did the right thing and pulled out. The US is currently seen positively in the region, though it dipped during Bush Jr tenure. ASEAN countries has woken up and arming themselves against China. My own country, Malaysia is belatedly constructing 6 more stealth frigates based on the extended French Gowind platform, with proper anti ship capabilities after China repeated came to potato distance of our shores.
Singapore is buying F35s while Indonesia, Vietnam and even poor Phillipines are also buying modern frigates. Slowly, but surely, ASEAN will eventually become a political-military alliance against China if China keep to provocating us. Old rivalries will be put on hold when facing an implacable enemy. The US knows this and is trying to capitalise politically. And frankly, we welcome it.
>inb4 "it ain't me" starts playing.
>>29293788
I wonder how would Philippines can acquire handful of Abrams MBTs and Bradley IFVs.
And it'll be interesting, the Filipinos riding some American hardware.
>>29294660
I prefer "what's that sound"
>>29293788
>facing an implacable enemy
>believing in bullshit made up by militarists so they can have spending money
>>29294834
>MBTs
Have you ever looked at the geography of the philippines?
>it paves the way for American military presence in Vietnam, something which has not been seen since the end of the Second Indochina war
So Far Cry 3 Blood Dragon was right about Vietnam War 2 happening.
>>29294868
>if I stick my head in the sand hard enough, the lion will go away
>>29294884
>that'd be a dragon
Also implying those countries wouldn't end up siding with China in the long run because of economic and trading benefits. Then your "implacable enemy" seamlessly shifts from China to the US and the militarists will gobble it up without asking questions, as they always do.
>>29293788
Malaysia needs to build robots.
stop living in the past rice mexican.
Gundams are the future.
>>29292828
>2020
>be innajungle
>drones detect Chicom activity
>joint US/Viet force readies
>blackhawks rev up
>soundcheck on audio system
>SOME FOLKS ARE B-
>base pauses
>old former NVA officer's eye twitches
War. War never changes.
>>29292828
I'm will just be like my dad as a tank commander
>>29294878
Blood Dragon is really spot on.
The only reason we dont look all disco is because of the rappers.
Once we get rid of them, laser robots and disco techno pzew pzew is ours.
>>29294924
You forget one very important factor here; they're gooks, and gooks hate each other. You give 'em a reason to kill each other; one grain or rice out of place, one fish head left in the pickle for a day too long, and all hell will break loose.
>>29295017
hopefully we get a new vietcong game.
the first one is a classic.
>>29295044
Is its rising son two?
>>29295043
they do bring rivalry to a whole new level that much is sure.
imagine if they were all muslims, say the japs, it would be double the fanaticism.
>>29295055
its okay but the first one is even better, made by czechs i think, before the whole console craze. check it up, its easy to download and everywhere.
Its Vietcong from 2003.
>>29295072
>Czechs
I just trust them with my pornos
And I why whloud I play a game where the enemy shoot at my dad and his men
>>29294878
Blood Dragon happened in 1980s 2007. But lasers are going to be mass produced soon, so WOOT!
>>29295092
Those crazy slavs do have some good games, stalker, metro 2033, the witcher....
>And I why whloud I play a game where the enemy shoot at my dad and his men
It really captures the feeling of the tropical jungle well, there is an entire part where you have to go through those shitty vc tunnels with a light and a pistols, really great. plus you play as an american, the last mission is when saigon got stormed i believe.
>>29295057
>they do bring rivalry to a whole new level that much is sure.
you have no idea
Vietnamese have been fighting the Chinese as long as people remember. Only times they haven't fought the Vietnamese was either because they were fighting the Americans, the french or were fighting each other (they only have a few years where their country has been in complete peace in all of its existence).
Every Vietnamese guy I talked to when I was there saw a war against China in the future and had an unholy hatred for the Chinese. Hell, the hatred for the Chinese takes it to the next level to the point where they even hate the Chinese people.
They see the French as a pest which at the end of the day helped build infrastructure (French sunk a lot of money to set up the foundation for the industrialization of Vietnam) and the Americans who helped hone in their fighting skills against a more formidable foe and to build up their armed forces (which was later used against the Chinese in the Sino-Vietnamese war).
>>29295127
OH ok I read Vietcong I thought you play as a dink
>>29295242
>playing as a vc
fuck that shit
>>29295219
holy fuck crazy motherfuckers...
its funny but somehow asians appear like every liberal's natural enemy or something, they dont even hate some far off tribe they hate the neighbours.
>>29295311
Can confirm as an asian.
We hate everyone.
>>29295368
well at least you are consistent.
to be honest it is kinda hard to see you supporting "black revolution" or something like that.
hell, even koreans in america during la riots went fucking siege mode.
>>29295043
>implying east asians aren't interested in making money above all else
the people they really enjoy killing is the white man
>>29295044
>>29295072
Yeah hugely underrated game, was fun times.
>>29294834
>>29294872
>>29294913
Tanks wouldn't be very useful for the Filipino military due to the rather shitty infrastructure and prevalence of islands. They're better off buying ATGMs and other anti-tank weaponry. The move to buy the FA-50s was a good one, but 12 jets doesn't make a modern air force. They really should be looking into more advanced multirole fighters like the F-18. Also the navy needs an overhaul something fierce, they can hardly defend their ocean boundaries as is. This all hinges on whether or not the Filipino high brass can get their corrupt heads out of their asses and wake up to the reality of an expanding China.
>>29294924
You forget that the most racist people on earth are Asians towards other Asians. There's some serious ethnic hatreds in the region that aren't going away any time soon.
>>29297908
And yet somehow all that racism only resulted in a handful of internal genocides and no war of any major consequence.
>>29294982
Kek
>>29297957
There were plenty of wars before what we would consider the modern era, and the various dickery going on in WW2 in the Pacific theatre and various smaller Cold War conflicts. Major consequence being that as I said, there remain to be many ethnic hatreds still existing in the region.
>>29295311
When your neighbors are some greedy motherfuckers who pay a visit to your country every now and then for those sweet sweet resources for thousands years, you cant help but harbor a deep hatred for them.
At least Laos and Cambodia dont have a grudge against us, that or we deluded ourselves into thinking so.
>>29294924
Why would we side with China if they take over our EEZ and park missile boats right on our borders? China is playing with fire and bluffing its way. No more proddings. Asians have a concept of "face". If you insult our "face" by repeatedly breaching our borders, no amount of money will salve it. The Malaysian Navy plans to eventually have 28 of these frigates. There is talk of dumping our stupid soviet Mig 29 fighters and buying Super Hornets. We are getting Paladins too from the US.
SOME FOLKS ARE BORN
>>29294848
Not "Let me Introduce Myself" or "I chopped a mountain down with my hand"
>>29298487
>no amount of money will salve it
Ahahahahaha no. Face and honor has a price, just like everything else with east asians.
As soon as Chinese trade is worth more than this political posturing the enemy will become some western country in Stalin-like fashion, then the dumb militarist animals will jabber about this new threat and ask for more money. Straight out the modern propaganda textbook.
>Why, of course, the people don't want war... the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.
>>29294982
I dunno, I think they'd eventually laugh about it. Yankee Doodle used to be something the British used to mock the Patriots, but we made it our own and now it's a staple of Independence Day parades.
>2022
>there's a stalemate on the Chinese front
>the USO brings in a show to the US/Viet FOB
>It's a Vietnamese CCR cover band
>the generals and colonels from both countries have visibly chapped asses
>younger officers and enlisted are laughing their asses off
>>29298506
MADE TO WAVE THE FLAG
>>29294660
the radios only play CCR, it was a clause in the deal
>>29294978
malaysians are islamic sandniggers...
P-8s, P-8s everywhere.
>>29295102
it's almost 2017, they were almost right
>>29299925
But they're good asian kebabs.
>>29298575
TAIWAN #1
JAPAN #2
W. KOREA #3
CHINA #4
USA #0
India-US-Japan-South Korea China based Treaty organization when ?
>>29299925
dont be mean to the maylay.
>>29300598
Not for a long time. China would have to stop harassing Indian outposts come to an agreement for revised but static borders (because the Indian/Chinese border in the Himalayas isnt well defined) the Himalayas to improve relations with India and give up all claims to the senakakus and other islands that japan wants and turn a blind eye to what happened in ww2 to restore relations with the nips
>>29299584
OOOOH THEIR EYES ARE RED, WHITE AND BLUE, LAWD
>>29302162
No you misunderstand me,
I meant an alliance of U.S-India-South Korea-Japan based on counter-balancing Chinese aggression when ?
>>29293788
>The US knows this and is trying to capitalise politically
Well yes but the military sales are about capitalising economically.
Why restrict yourself?
>>29294924
>Also implying those countries wouldn't end up siding with China in the long run
I don't think you know much about asian history.
Vietnam has a deeply embedded hatred of China, they've basically been fighting revolutions or border wars or border skirmishes for the last two thousand years.
>>29295057
>imagine if they were all muslims, say the japs
That would be the malaysians.
>>29302635
>Why restrict yourself?
because no orders of substantial proportions have come in yet.
US just lifted the arms embargo on Vietnam (i believe it was last year) and since then the Vietnamese have looked to upgrade their arsenals, with what looks like a trend where they will buy less and less from the Russians, and more from the US and other western nations (this will take time though as Russia still gives the Vietnamese a good deal on their equipment).
>>29302162
>with India and give up all claims to the senakakus and other islands that japan wants and turn a blind eye to what happened in ww2 to restore relations with the nips
What?
India doesn't claim the senkakus. They already control the Andman and Nicobar islands directly off the entrance to the Malacca straits. A vastly more enviable position than anything in the SCS that is surrounded by hostile countries.
>>29302699
>and other islands that Japan wants
I probably should have put a comma to differentiate between the two countries
>>29295219
>Vietnamese have been fighting the Chinese as long as people remember
This.
Every Vietnamese city has streets named after ancient generals who beat the Chinese (and some that died valiantly afterwards).
They're greatest legend is about a pair of sisters who raised and led an army in a revolution to avenge an executed husband and maybe a rape, they took over a bunch of forts and held them for a few years before being beaten back and then they drowned themselves in a river to avoid more rape.
Well, that's the story anyway. But every city has a Hai Ba Trung st which is Two Sisters Trung.
>>29293788
Not sure.
Am Singaporean, bit our gov. really likes China, letting a ton of their migrants in and whatnot.
>>29302728
>Am Singaporean, bit our gov. really likes China
Because the latest wave of repression in China is driving the wealthy to put their money in Singapore.
And now that China is beginning to clean up Hong Kong's tax shelters, those people are moving their money to Singapore too.
Singapore loves China but not in a way that they'll do them any favours.
>>29292828
Vietnam has long wanted a friendship with the US. Our biggest mistake of the Cold War was not backing Uncle Ho and working to form a US - Viet partnership. Could have prevented Pol Pot and spread our South East Asian influence exponentially, further pressuring China.
>>29300598
>India-US-Japan-South Korea China based Treaty organization when ?
Never going to happen. South Korea and Japan don't trust each other. India doesn't trust US because of their relationship with Pakistan.
Best option is US-Japan.
>>29302819
Kennedy getting killed was a diplomatic disaster.
He was against escalation in Vietnam and would have repaired relations with a number of Asian countries.
>>29302831
>India doesn't trust US because of their relationship with Pakistan.
>Best option is US-Japan.
but that's changing
Paki-US relations have been pretty cold since the Bin Laden raid and congress just barely approved a sale of F16's to Pakistan because the US wants to increase (and is increasing) military cooperation with India.
http://www.defense.gov/News-Article-View/Article/604775
http://csis.org/program/us-india-security-and-defense-cooperation
But I don't want to fight in vietnam. Can't we just stay in the desert?
>>29302861
Doesn't matter.
The only country India has ever had a formal military treaty with has been the USSR.
That too only because they didn't have any credible nuclear deterrence at that time in a high aggression environment. When US sent the fully armed 7th fleet to attack India in the 1971 War, they were stopped by Soviet Nuclear submarines. Something they aren't likely to forget anytime in the near future.
A China deterrence will have to be Japan-US-Philippines at best. Maybe throw in Vietnam as well.
>>29302819
Uncle Ho was a huge ameriboo, so sad that we had to let those fucking frogs get in between.
Also that communism thing.
>>29303000
I know, it's why Vietnam declared independence on July 4, 1946, and has a similar Declaration of Independence and Constitution.
>>29298487
but arent you too stupid to use it?
malaysians are essentially tropical mexicans of the ASEAN, no one takes you seriously, why dont you just die if you are so useless?
>>29302670
i am talking about the competent asians, not tropical baboons with bamboo spears
>>29292828
Oh man I can picture it already
>Tigerstripe gets reprinted and made into ACUs and MOLLE gear en masse
>Chinook helicopter insertions into ChiCom territory
>LRRP Recon Marines oper8ing all over the place innajungle
>M72 rockets, claymores, bedrolls, and other gear lashed to rucksacks
>Drone missiles disappearing into the thick jungle canopy, followed by the muffled boom of the explosion
>US and Viet forces begin constructing artificial islands to counter the chinese ones
>F16s dropping 500 pounders and Napalm like its going out of style. Maybe some F35s get their first taste of combat too.
>Island hopping campaign a la WW2 Pacific war
>Salty old vets from the first the war pulling the strings this time
>...
>It ain't me starts playing
>>29302984
But the security threat that is China might push India to align more with the US. It might not be a formal treaty, but bkth countries will look to counter China together.
Also, if anyone is interested, US-cambodian joint military exercise in cambodia called Angkor sentinel just started. It's the seventh of an ongoing annual joint military exercise between the two countries
>>29297908
>You forget that the most racist people on earth are Asians towards other Asians.
We are more disgusted and appalled by blacks honestly. At least most other Asians(except the Cinese, they are bugs) are worthy enough to hate.
>>29303607
What nationality are you m8?
>>29303615
Jappo
>>29302819
>>29303000
While I do think we should've backed Ho, I think you're being a bit over-idealistic here. Ho did like us, but he was a committed communist ever since the early 20's (he helped found the French communist party). I'm aware that he drafted a declaration of independence similar to ours, but his version of freedom wasn't going to be the same as ours and there would've been some friction because of that. I think the best we could've gotten was a Yugoslavia of sorts in Asia in terms of a 3rd player, which would've been a massive improvement over what happened. Also I think if Ho had lived to see the end of the war, things may have turned out differently in the immediate postwar era when the Vietnamese politburo went full retard and crashed their economy.
>>29303676
Ho was dying for US help. He was petitioning us as far back as the 20s. The French essentially used Vietnam as blackmail to keep them in NATO. We were financing their ops there as early as the 50s. The sad truth is yes, Ho wouldn't necessarily have been as agreeable as a puppet, but he would have very likely worked with us. Especially for trade benefits. Vietnam is/was communisty because colonialism isn't exactly fun for the oppressed masses. They are an interesting country to say the least. Ho also managed to balance Chinese and Soviet influence throughout the entire war (until he died) and this allowed Vietnam their unique spot that helped keep their country functional to this very day.
>>29303742
Oh I'm well aware he was petitioning us for help for decades before the war, and he may have gotten it if FDR and Kennedy had lived. I understand why Ho turned to communism, but I also think that he was a bit naïve in regards as to how to implement, and this sort of carried on into the Vietnamese Communist Party. He was however open to change over time, hence why I assume that had we opened up to him things may have turned out radically different. He and the other higher ups actually admitted that the North Vietnamese land reforms of the late 1950's had been a disaster.
Overall I see the US and Vietnam getting back together, partly out of necessity and partly because this is kind of how it was supposed to be. Ho sought the favor of the other communist nations, but as you said he never wanted to be wholly reliant on one or the other. I remember reading somewhere that his appraisals of Mao and Stalin were of two giants that he wanted to get on the good side of, but never trust. In China's case that proved somewhat prophetic since they ended up invading. In the Soviet case, they grew somewhat close but when they became basically reliant on the USSR and some of the PACT countries for all of their foreign trade and aid, they learned there was limits on the hospitality. I believe one rumor during the late cold war was that the Vietnamese politburo sent a memo to their Soviet counterpart asking for more food and aid, to which the Soviets merely responded "tighten your belts". The Vietnamese response was "send more belts". Eventually Soviet aid dwindled as the USSR began to fall apart, and in the late 90's Vietnam decided to reinvent its international image by starting to open itself up to foreign trade and commerce and open up relations to formerly hostile countries, us included. Leading to where we are today, with the Vietnamese wanting to buy weapons from us once again for the first time in decades. History has an interesting way of repeating itself.
>>29303835
Interesting to say the least. Here's to the new millennium. Vietnam and USA friends that were meant to be.
>>29303476
Don't forget the UH-1Y Venoms and
AH-1Zs melting face again.
Or B1 Thunder runs, Arclite missions.
Muh dik.
>>29303936
Can't wait.
>>29303983
Can't wait to lose miserably all over again?
>>29304231
We'll most likely be operating alongside Vietnamese forces against the Chinese, meaning that we're going to shitstomp those Chicom bastards.
>>29304319
>couldn't win in Korea
>couldn't win in Vietnam
but.. but... it'll be different this time
>>29304429
t. fang ding dong
gonna finish what macarthur couldn't
>>29304449
>macarthur
Daily reminder that military animals are subservient to politicians
>>29304429
Korea and Vietnam were a long fucking time ago mr. fiddy-cent. Considering that its going to most likely be us+South Korea+Japan+ASEAN nations including Vietnam, I don't see China coming out on top.
>>29304231
Vietnam hates the chinese.
>>29292828
>B52's based in Saigon when?
Never. They will be based in Darwin Australia.
A marine base is already there.
>>29303936
>Et moi et moi et moi being blasted out of Super Puma's as a F16 block 50 burns the jungle near the town of Xiaobaxi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIzLbXz5Au4
>>29304429
>Vietnam
depends what you classify as the end of hostilities. Vietnamese see the war against the US as one conflict and the war were they reunified the country as another (like the Finns and the Soviets).
>Korea
do you see a DPKR flag in seoul?
Purpose of the war was saving ROK, not unifying the peninsula. Though I will admit that they got greedy and scared the Chinese into intervening. Should have stopped and allowed the DPRK to remain where they were (so as to allow for a buffer zone without pissing off the Chinese)
>>29304493
>do you see a DPKR flag in seoul?
Do you see a ROK flag in Pyongyang?
The US and all its UN allies couldn't beat a literal third-world China in the 50's, and yet somehow the US will curbstomp a far more resourceful China now. Heh.
>>29304493
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qHX493bB3U
>>29304511
There was once a ten foot hill, in a week it was 50 feet and red, wanna know how? It was 40 feet higher and red from all the failed Chinese human wave tactics. :3
>>29304511
>Do you see a ROK flag in Pyongyang?
that's not why the US intervened though.
>Third world China in 50's
>comparing an autocratic state that doesn't give a shit about its citizens to one that prefers its soldiers alive and happy
throwing men at an objective like they're worthless and then throwing even more men to capitalize on the breach you made doesn't speak much about China other than they knew they could waste a few thousand men on a hill.
Nowadays with the advent of social media and a growing middle class, it'll be much harder for them to repeat that without all the relatives and Chinese citizens getting mad about their kids being used as cannon fodder.
>>29304569
>still didn't win
Is body count bragging just the American method of excusing their military failures?
>>29304579
Now that China is far richer, they have more options available besides frontal attacks.
Besides, there won't be any war, all this is just standard political posturing by slant politicians to distract the dirty masses from their daily misery. The politicians are the parents watching the militarist brats pose and preen for the entertainment of the other children.
>>29304638
Getting rich, 50 cents a post.
>>29295219
>one 2 month long border war in 1979
>for as long as they can remember
What?
the gook is right. america does not currently have the political will to take the gloves off and fight a real fight.
so we do this "limited war" and "police action" bullshit as if we havent learned a damned thing.
>>29298487
>Malaysia
>fighting China ever
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA
>>29302258
Never
>>29292828
is the second Indo-china war your liberal way of referring to the Vietnam war? fucking liberals
>>29302788
That's why Singapore's economy is in recession right?
>>29302861
>just barely approved
Last I heard it's not.
Also, India is not going to pick sides or join an alliance in the near future. They're sole concern is South Asia.
Any war with China is unlikely because of nuclear weapons and the recent border dispute settlement they made.
Also, Pakistan is still a key US partner. As long as we are in Afghanistan, we are with Pakistan over India.
>>29303530
Very unlikely. Most Indians are politically against such a thing.
If any party ever gets the votes to support that, they'll likely get kicked out of power.
>>29304477
>any of those nations actually actively helping the US in a war against China
Unlikely. Only Japan may take part, and that requires us to be attacked first.
>>29304579
You're wrong.
We tried to conquer all of Korea, and got our shit pushed back past Seoul.
We tried to defeat North Vietnam, and got knocked out in a war that nearly tore our country apart.
The Chinese will fight. Doubting their ability because of "social media" is bullshit. There's a reason for all their censorship.
>The armchair generals and war romanticists
>nowarirl
China wont do shit.
>Fighting the Western Merchant Nations that buy my stuff and Star-Wars level black tech.
Did day/k/are get back from soccer practice yet?
>>29304727
Vietnamese history goes back as far as 258BC (recorded history), and from 111BC to 938 AD the Chinese dominated Vietnam, and the entire time the Vietnamese fought them, then they had about a hundred years of peace then civil war and then in 1407 the Chinese invaded again and then they kicked em out, fought each other and then had the Chinese invade again.
This happened up until 1778 when the French conquered Indochina little by little until they controlled the entire country.
Plus the Chinese nationalists occupied northern Vietnam in the aftermath of WW2 and only left after pissing the Vietnamese off even more.
>>29304771
First "Vietnam war" was French vs Viet Mihn. Wouldn't make sense that there were two Vietnam wars (also the war included Cambodia and Laos, which were both part of Indochina)
>>29304811
it survived the Senate, not congress, but it still speaks volumes as to the US wanting to get India on its side.
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/2016/03/10/pakistan-f-16-sale-survives-us-senate-dogfight/81602882/
This of course is all speculation, but the notion is that narendra modi is looking for options as to how to deal with China and its increased aggression.
Granted Pakistan is still a US partner, but they're increasingly aligning themselves with the Chinese and have cooperated with China in building an arm of the New Silk Road project that goes to Karachi (or was it Islamabad).
>>29304852
Vietnam is gonna start helping soon. As for ROK, if the Chinese continue helping DPKR and worsen relations because of the deployment of THAAD to the peninsula, ROK might start aligning more with the US. Though it won't push its weight around regionally as its own security takes precedence and they aren't threatened by China. At most they can stop the spread of Chinese influence and help other countries financially, but I don't see them getting involved with countries like Vietnam or the Philippines
>>29304811
Holy fuck you could not be more ass backwards.
>>29304881
only after DPRK invaded ROK.
the second indochina war couldn't be won if we didn't invade PRVN or had the French granted Vietnam independence while at the same time fighting the commies (like Britain did in Maylay)
>>29304892
>but mom i am not done shitposting my violence fantasies on the internet
>>29294660
No "paint it black"?
>>29292828
What strange bedfellows are furnished by time.
>>29303630
If you wanna see strange bedfellows read up on the Afghan civil war.
People switched sides so often, you had anti communists fighting alongside communists because either the pashtuns or the Uzbeks became too powerful (as an example)
>>29305044
Meant for >>29304988
>>29304881
>shit pushed back past Seoul
Are you forgetting the part where we pushed back to the 38th parallel?
>>29304727
There were border skirmishes going well into the '90s after the initial attack.
>>29305044
Damn. Kinda reminds me of the stuff I used to read about concerning the Spanish civil war.
>>29303936
The first B-52 that flies overhead will give us some interesting PTSD news stories.
>>29304781
Our economy is not in recession, you cuck.
MAKE MANCHURIA JAPANESE AGAIN.
>>29304941
>prithee my bunghole is pained
>mine syntax doth sound like the very definition of failure
>I must partake all the phallus
>>29292828
Wish they used this to clear the forests. Probably get some useful wood in the meantime as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=699Z70U4g5I
