![20160713_173640[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/zx70M7q.jpg "20160713_173640[1].jpg")
HPR ammo problems, so I got a few boxes of this shit, and shot it for a few ranges sessions, and I am getting a lot of jams with it. I am using a glock 23 gen 3 and I have 5 mags. When I went today 4/5 mags jammed with every 4th round, when I switched over to some federal ammo, not a single problem.
Any one else having problems with HPR?
>>30611919
My guess it's loaded colder than normal ammo. I had the same problem when I bought some .44 mag for my desert eagle. Not enough power. Would short stroke on every shot. Granted the DE needs hot ammo to function, but this stuff definitely did not have the power to cycle the action.
>>30611945
That sounds about right, like it would barely get the cartridge into the chamber, and it just got stuck.
>>30611945
looking at this. I think you are right, they are 100 fps slower than the rest.
http://www.ballistics101.com/40_caliber_sw.php
http://www.hprammo.com/catalog/tmj/40-sandw-22/
Can we make this an ammo question thread? Anybody ever try this stuff in .223?
>getting shilled by snatch00
Worst than getting shilled by MAC, at least IMI aren't shit.
>>30612164
explain
![20160311_203709[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/68rbBnO.jpg "20160311_203709[1].jpg")
le bump
>>30612004
Yeah I think their major marketing gimmick is that suppoesedly this ammo burns "cleaner" than other brands. I couldn't really notice that much of a difference aside from PPU's .44mag which could cycle my DE, but admittedly was pretty damn dirty.
>>30612110
Heard decent things about it. I think I saw MAC review it once and he said it was decent, haven't used it myself however.
>>30615720
so less powder the less you have to clean.
>>30611945
I haven't had any problems with the 10mm loads. The fmj specs are 1290 fps and the jhp are 1270. I haven't chrono'd them myself but they definitely feel hotter than the ppu or s&b loadings I've used.
