Technical question for some of you knowledgeable anons
Is it possible to convert a non-inertial firing pin into an inertial pin?
I'm in the process of turning a brand new zastava m57 into a truck gun, but the pin concerns me. I could just leave the safety on, but I'd rather have something ready to roll, and don't really trust the safety for that matter, even though the m57 has a real safety as opposed to other toks.
From what I can see it's as simple as taking a few thousandths off the pin and getting a new spring, accompanied with several trials to get the spring right.
What say you crafty motherfuckers?
>>30600193
>Is it possible to convert a non-inertial firing pin into an inertial pin?
Technically yes, but if the gun wasn't designed or it, it likely won't work
Inertia firing pins often have much stronger strikers/hammers
>>30600193
>I'm in the process of turning a brand new zastava m57 into a truck gun, but the pin concerns me. I could just leave the safety on, but I'd rather have something ready to roll, and don't really trust the safety for that matter, even though the m57 has a real safety as opposed to other toks.
Toks won't go off unless you run with the hammer cocked
>>30601015
couldn't you compensate for a stronger hammer spring? It seems like it could be possible, but it's gonna take a lot of trial and error. Are you willing to risk the error OP?
>>30600193
why the FUCK are you destroying a ginuine tok? Just run it as is you cringing aspy
>>30601533
>ginuine tok
>zastava
lol welcome newfriend
>>30601533
Zastava M57s are literally brand new firearms dumbass. They have no historical value at all.
>>30601571
OP here
and yes, they are new and very, very crude. But they're perfect project guns taking into account how cheap and shitty they are.
>>30600193
call a gunsmith. let him have the liability if the shit doesn't work out.
>>30601533
zastava firearms aren't historical and aren't genuine tokarevs. On that note what's wrong with bubba'ing a tok since theres over 25 million of them?
>>30601673
>buba'd toks
pics?
>>30602227
pretty clean imo