Why aren't we using this as an area denial weapon?
>>30355269
Because it kills even robots that get close to it and is pretty much impossible to clean up?
Also what is the exclusion zone and implying its not already denying a huge area.
>>30355269
>weighs hundreds of tons
>would probably cost a shit ton to make
>lingering contamination
just drop some land mines
>>30355269
it is a denial weapon. The govt that caused it denies they had anything to do with it
>>30355269
>hundreds of tons of radioactive shit
Besides, that stuff only produces a 1/10 the radiation it once did, so you'll likely not die if you stand next to it for like a second or two.
>>30355299
>Because it kills even robots that get close to it
Don't believe everything you read on the internet, Anon.
>>30355352
OP's photo was right after the accident.
This one was taken later after much of the radiation had dissipated.
>>30355269
>Area denial weapons
>No realistic way to decontaminate area
Yeah let's fill the earth with super radioactive lava flows in WW3 and then when we win we can just go live on mars because the earth is a lethal nuclear toilet.
>>30355322
kek
>>30355352
>what is radioactive half-life
I guess you never studied high-school physics
>>30355373
SHALL
Radiation protection tech here. Time, distance, shielding. It would only be an effective area denial weapon over a small area. The further you are from it, the less dose you take. Put some shielding up(like the corner they hid behind) and you take less dose. Besides that, it's extremely heavy, and has a high likelihood of giving everyone involved with it dose.
Basically, the guys storing/loading/deploying it would have more ill effects than any enemy you tried to use it against.
>>30355368
Then surely you can provide me with a citation detailing exactly when both photos were taken, and what the comparable radiation levels were.
Also, I'd like some proof that the gay facebook-tier clickbait story in the OP's image is true.
You seem pretty confident about this so obviously you should be able to give me what I'm looking for.
>>30355368
>>30355396
The picture is still incorrect though. And I doubt looking at it would instantly kill anyone, I don't think anyone died instantly from radiation anywhere at Chernobyl apart from the blast of the initial explosion.
The half lifes of those materials lasts hundreds to thousands of years, it will still be incredibly radioactive, but this picture is all about impressing 12 year olds and retards on the internet.
>>30355413
>autism the post
>>30355398
NUCLEAR
>>30355435
>asking for evidence is now "autistic"
Looks like I was right, you can't do it.
>>30355413
Not same guy and I can't be bothered to track down picture dates for you, but here is more info
http://imgur.com/gallery/AKSZt
>>30355434
>And I doubt looking at it would instantly kill anyone
In the sense that you'd get an instant lethal dose, yes it technically turns you into a walking dead.
>>30355413
>you seem pretty confident
Do I?
You seem pretty fucking dick-filled.
You want a link to absolutely prove something? You won't find it fuckface.
>>30355444
An imgur link with unsourced claims is not a citation.
>>30355446
Nope 300 seconds to get a lethal dose.
http://imgur.com/gallery/AKSZt
>>30355449
Wow, I'm totally convinced.
Don't you have some dogs to jerk off or something? Why are you filling up my board with autistic garbage like this?
>>30355446
>instant lethal dose
I rephrase that, lethal dose was in 300 seconds at the highest recorded level, apparently.
>>30355434
I doubt it'll be an instantaneous death but you're probably at deaths door by the time you're out of the nuclear complex.
>>30355456
>filling up MY board
classic autism
how does it feel to fill up the spectrum?
>>30355455
>maybe if I keep posting it, it'll magically turn into a real source
You're not impressing anyone with a link that is literally the second result on Google.
>>30355413
>>30355446
http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/the-elephant-foot-of-the-chernobyl-disaster-1986/
Better article
>>30355452
Then do your own research, there are no ends of details about Chernobyl on wikipedia.
>>30355464
>continues to avoid providing a source for his claims
Do you think I'm too stupid to notice what you're doing?
>>30355470
This is an anonymous board.
I was providing anecdotal evidence.
If you don't know what that is then I can't help you.
>>30355468
That link is not a citation because I deem it so.
>>30355468
>Better article
No? There isn't a single source for the claims made in that article either.
Do you not understand what a source is? You're just copy and pasting links from the first page of Google results for "elephant's foot".
Jesus christ, kid.
>Then do your own research
No, faggot. You made a claim, you back it up. What are we, in third grade recess? I'm not going to just automatically believe anything you say, especially when your ONLY tactic is to copy/paste google shit and call me autistic. Fuck's sake, you are a special child.
>>30355462
Watch some of the documentaries on Chernobyl. After the accident a team of scientists made multiple trips inside to track the nuclear material down, they found the elephants foot. They mostly died of cancer but it was years later.
>>30355481
>I was providing anecdotal evidence.
Oh, so you were at Chernobyl?
Give me a fucking break. You are well and truly retarded.
>>30355491
The planet would be a ruin if people weren't willing to provide counter-evidence to evidence-less arguments.
Are you 12, or can you really not find anything out on your own?
Need a hand to hold till your foots in the grave?
>>30355502
>still doesn't understand what anecdotal evidence is
if i was there it would be an eye-witness account, get your terminology correct bruv
>>30355493
The first responders probably had a worse time though, with the radioactive dust and steam in the air killing their skin cells and such.
>>30355491
>>30355466
I'm not a fucking nuclear scientist and I don't have access to the radiation level readings they took or know where to find them. I linked something that challenges the ridiculous claim in OP's pic. I doubt they are far from the truth.
Yes I used google, I'm not going to waste my time tracking down materials to prove something I have a passing interest in to random people on 4chan.
>>30355550
Wow, you must not have autism.
Congratulations, now get out of here!
>>30355529
There were helicopter pilots that flew over the reactor dumping lead into the inferno.
Most of them were dead within a month as I understand it.
>>30355844
>lead
They dropped sandbags.
The "radiation lava" is actually a silicon glass.
>>30355446
>>30355455
Chernobyl's elephants foot isn't instantly deadly , but it is possible for a radiation source so immense that it knocks people unconscious and puts them into a coma
>>30355438
POOP
>>30355434
the picture is incorrect about it being a medusa. With proper blindfolds you could fuck a mythological medusa with no ill effects. This thing kills by proximity - it'd kill a blind man just the same as anyone else.
>>30355916
I should get some u235 and rape some bitches
>>30356396
I sexually identity as a stone golem
>>30355462
Did he died ?
>>30356396
what business would a blind man have trying to fuck it though?
>>30355322
>>30356408
KANGS
>>30356523
Japanese gov kept him alive until he turned into goop
>>30356639
That's from Fukushima? I though it was from Chernobyl.
>>30356690
1999 Tokaimura accident
>>30356523
No, he absorbed 20 sieverts, and his body liquefied he's fine.
>>30356690
Nope this is from an incident way earlier. Can't remember the name but the just of it is that the dude was refining nuclear material by pouring a bucket of junk into a vat of the junk and he get the amount wrong or something and it went critical momentarily or something Idk.
>>30355269
>not understanding how half lives work
>>30356777
Kek. He cooked the lemon.
>>30355462
This is probably one of the worst deaths I've ever heard of. And the guy was called Ouchi to top it off.
The Soviets exposed dissidents to x-rays in the past. They would be arrested arbitrarily, and have an x-ray machine pumping into them from the room next door for a few weeks before release.
The fact that that is no longer done shows how efficient it is.
>>30356527
He's blind, might as well make use of it.
>>30355340
Naw you wouldn't, already workers have taken pictures of it. You can only be near it for a matter of seconds though it's still pretty radioactive.
>>30355860
they did drop lead too
>>30355269
Because it continues to be a weapon after it leaves your hands, and could just as easily be used against you. hotheads would break off little bits using explosives and make dirty bombs with it. Sure they'd die of cancer, allah wills it.
>>30356639
>Japanese gov kept him alive until he turned into goop
They actually even kept him alive a little longer than that.
>>30359160
D E S I G N A T E D
>>30359218
GOYIM
>>30359409
INFRINGED
>>30355413
God, you sure are a lazy entitled fuck.
I'll take, 'A High School understanding of Radioactive material' for $100 Alex.
>>30359438
HARAM
