Are they just looking for more money or what?
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/revealed-russian-invasion-could-overrun-nato-60-hours-15112
http://www.weeklystandard.com/defense-official-russia-could-destroy-nato-in-60-hours-or-less/article/2002735
http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1253.html
It'll take more than 60 hours because you have to factor in the Russians need to rape their fellow soldiers.
>>30310536
More money, and trying to deflect attention from the actual invasion going on.
>>30310536
I mean, if the forces have absolutely no back up and Russia decides to JUST their logistics Grozny style, sure.
>>30310625
>large breasted
someone doesn't "get" this meme
>>30310625
>Implying MAGA is for cowtits
>>30310536
>While light infantry forces might slow down Russian forces, heavy armored vehicles like the M1A2 Abrams main battle tank and Bradley fighting vehicle would be the key to defending those countries. But the United States—and other NATO allies such as Germany—have reduced their armored forces in Europe to paltry levels. What forces do remain in theatre would take far too long to arrive.
Tankfags pls go. ATGM kills the tank.
And nothing of value would be lost. Europe might even benefit from Czar Putin's leadership.
>>30314806
>implexing MAGA isn't for all tits
>>30314807
I'm guessing Cavalry decided to match their brothers in sitting in shilling for more funding.
Also love how they gloss over NATO 'allies' constantly cutting and expecting the US to pick up slack.
>>30314807
But that's wrong.
