>>30295183
>Or is the tax stamp a dealbreaker?
>tax stamp
you don't get how this works do you?

>>30295198
It's a destructive device.

I'd buy one. Hell, I was looking for a 40mm DD for a while but they're either shit tier or cost thousands and thousands.

I'm an autist though, they wouldn't sell much.

37mm China lake when?

>>30295183
>>30295224
You don't realize that HE 40mm rounds are now hitting several thousands of dollars a round, plus the tax stamp and wait time.

For every
Single
Round.

Not worth it in any way

>>30295832
I do realize that, actually. HE isn't the only thing you can launch out of a 40mm.

>>30295832
Are you allowed to reload a DD tax-stamped HE shell on the same stamp?

I mean the brass case is kind of analogous to the receiver so wondering if they would let you put a new primer+powder+projie in it.

How about 40mm shotshells?

>>30295868
No, the casing that holds the explosive is the serial numbered part.

>>30295880
bastards

>>30295183
37mm for flares maybe, other than that nobody will buy that thanks to the paperwork. Still even if you'd manage to produce replicas it's nothing more than a toy range or dindu lighter.

I just wanna blast chalk.

>>30295183

Doesn't russia also have an equivalent sorta pump-action grenade launcher that they still use a shitton?

>>30296654
Gm 94, slightly bigger nades