Why is this allowed?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
Why is this allowed?
>>30282261
Why not?
They got cucked pretty fucking hard for it.
>>30282261
You are right, they need to do some work on how the formation looks. Just look at that guy on the left of flag bearer.
>>30282290
That's the flag of Lapland Air Command you prat
>>30282451
Thanks for the clarification.
>>30282261
Because it triggers vatniks and leftards
>abloo bloo bloo
>>30282261
The Swastika is a solar symbol.
>>30282261
Why is this allowed? Look at upper left corner.
>>30282261
needs spurdos shopped in
>>30282261
Because benis
>>30282503
Vatniks already rekt the swatiska
>>30282512
That's not a swastika, it's facing the opposite direction.
>>30283481
>it's facing the opposite direction
>mfw
There are many kinds of swastikas...
>>30282261
Riddle me this /k/
Why did Europe get cucked so hard after WW2? And not just over guns, but on almost every issue. From Finland to Germany to the UK, it seems like everyone lost their collective balls after WW2.
The US didn't experience this, at least not in the same fashion. In fact, given the socialism that was rampant between 1910-1945, one could argue that the end of the war and the resulting Cold War made America more red-blooded than ever.
>>30283481
If you mean the NSDAP swastika, youre wrong. But still, the finnish shall keep their right to use the symbols they always used, even before the nazies came to power in germany
>>30284400
Basically everything you're assuming about postwar Europe is imaginary, that's why.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_use_of_the_swastika_in_the_early_20th_century#Finland
the more you know
>>30284400
Because of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4
Soviet Union was an Allied country, so they didn't lose their power after the WWII and that allowed them to start eroding the European values. Basically what we are seeing now is a succeful brainwashing of nearly all of a continent. The other half was just brute force as seen in Eastern Europe.
WWII was over 70 years ago, People should just get over it already.
>>30282332
They're Air Force, and conscripts at that. It's a miracle they're in a somewhat orderly formation.
because fins dont give shit?
>>30284473
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_von_Rosen
The more you actually know.
>>30282261
Its older than the nazi one
>>30282261
Because it has nothing to do with Germany, it was in use before the third reich even existed
>>30282261
I know right?
Chairforce couldn't march in step to save their lives.
>>30284621
>there are people alive today that were around to talk to Vets from the Civil War.
You can't get over something that is still in first or even second hand memory.
Especially since the consequences of said events are still very much around today.
>>30284400
>but on almost every issue
How broadly are we defining this?
In moving left on social welfare, healthcare, etc, it's very very easy to understand: The nature of total war brought rich and poor closer together, and [at least in Britain] the rich didn't want to repeat the mistake of WW1 where fighting men came home to unemployment, poor housing and healthcare. They wanted a land fit for heroes, and that meant giving ex-soldiers good services that the market wasn't going to provide
The position of the USA in Bretton Woods and 1950s euphoria allowed them to skip over making long-term reforms such as to healthcare, leading to the debates of today.
