Big girl thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
Post pics of big girls.
Medium girls also welcome.
Here's some gore.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOO60OoqGCE
>>30259536
HHHHNNNNNGGGGGGGGG
>>30259536
holy shit those are some sexy curves
>>30259542
why the badly faked CGI crash?
>>30259536
>>30259975
Looks like it is pooping tanks.
Also that must be some strong front doors.
>>30259975
Won't SAMs rape this ?
>>30260158
>dropping them into hot zone
real life isn't hollywood, they don't go near SAMs that haven't been killed yet.
She's, uh, well rounded imho
>>30260613
so fucking sexy.
is it wrong to want to stick your dong in a hind?
>>30260158
that's why you don't fly them near SAMs, idiot.
>>30260620
can't blame you
>>30260613
I hope its only the reflect but... is the pilot wearing a tracksuit?
Why the fuck is a C17 more expensive than an F22
>>30260658
>you see dimittri if wearing adidas in battle you will dodge enemy fire because of fear getting tracksuit dirty in crash
>>30260613
>>30260647
THICC
>>30260677
...because it's fucking huge?
>>30260734
The C5 is huger and costs alot less
>>30260743
C17 is a lot newer and more advanced.
>>30260743
A single C-5M is over three hundred million dollars
>>30260755
What kind of advanced things do you put into an airlifter?
>>30260768
air, duh.
>>30260768
Aeronautical instruments, communication equipment, air frame material and design.
>>30259536
Fuck off Japan
>>30260743
>C-5B Cost
>$262M
>C-5M RERP
>$100M
>Total Cost
>$362M per aircraft
>>30260843
Damn cool.
>>30260694
More like sleek.
>>30260861
Jolly giant.
>>30260889
The vodka burner rolling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLxEHIbHUlY
Beautiful aircraft.
![SRO4TAi[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/iznYaMo.jpg "SRO4TAi[1].jpg")
Tank strong Messerschmitt we war yuo
If you're gonna be a bear.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmD5w7z8iDk
be a grizzly.
why can't we vatniks still produce upgraded An-12 like amercunts do with C-130J
this mini-76 will never see the light thanks to curry niggers
>>30260004
Why is it that when ever I see western paratroop drops they are always using the exits on the side of the aircraft and never the exit ramp.
>>30261080
Entanglement sucks.
Why don't we see this configuration more often?
>>30261080
>Russia
>Western
>Never using the exit ramp
Anon, what?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w32kaOYb7lo
>>30261126
I guess because the need for specific aircraft designs that can take off poor airstrips is rather limited?
>>30261186
Doesn't it come with lift advantage in general, which is why it's used for short takeoff?
And even from a commercial airstrip it would be good to minimize the chance of sucking up debris
>>30261186
Fucking beautiful.
>>30261201
Don't know anon, just guessing.
>>30261186
Beriev!
>>30261203
Pls buy ;_;
somthin about her makes me hard
>>30261126
Something something... C-17.
>>30261201
And even from a commercial airstrip it would be good to minimize the chance of sucking up debris
you can't remove the engines without a big crane, that's why pretty much every jet engine hangs below the wing
>>30259678
nobody can get the actual crash video. all the copies out there stop right before impact
Can't believe nobody has posted the 133, the 130's big dick brother. They have one at the Air Force Museum in Dayton, thing looks awesome.
BIG BOMBER
>>30261380
>>30261623
>>30259536
THICC
>>30261448
top fucking kek
gotta give this thick girl some love
Most aesthetic big girl.
>>30262410
The same Y-20 side by side with C-17
>>30262556
Forgot the fucking pic
>>30262572
I like this shot the most
>>30262572
Here we see both aircrafts squared off for the best transport aircraft title
>>30262611
The C-7 is still a class above the Y-20 (66 vs 76 tons).
But still, the Y.20 is a beautiful transporter.
>tfw no wide-hipped F-16
>>30262594
>hot lesbian make out
lewd
>>30262715
>>30262734
Goddamn, big planes are cool
new classic
new russian BE-200. they are starting to build new modern version of it now. this is first one. still in testing.
>>30262894
Yum.
>>30261745
dropping matches on kindling
>>30262915
tukatukatuka...
>>30262915
No love for the Super Guppy?
new modernization of IL-76: IL-76-MD-M
>>30262968
>>30262976
>No An-225
Faggots, the lot of you
>>30263021
THE biggest girl.
test
>>30260743
>>30260755
>>30260677
C-5M mechanic here
ask me questions if you want to know about this big slut
>>30263021
>>30261011
>>30262605
>mfw
>>30263295
Holy hot buttery lincoln logs
An-225 2: electric boogaloo when?
>>30263436
>>30260053
airbrakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7q3j69-SHM&list=FLZNcMNiljN4MDH7hDfMe7Ew&index=69
>>30264080
what an odd placement.
aren't those usually on the wings or top?
I've always been a fan of the KC-10. I've dealt with a few in my career and every time I see one these days I am still surprised at how big it actually is.
>inb4 that's what she said
>F-16 getting a piece of dat ass
>>30261011
Damn I love that thing. I wonder how much just the landing gears/wheels/tires weigh. I wonder what the fuel burn rate was during that run-up?
>>30261443
>/
>>30262767
Muh baby... Any idea which air station this is? Doesn't look like Elizabeth City or Clearwater... Anyone have any idea?
>>30259536
>>30266560
http://www.uscg.mil/history/aviation/galleries/USCGAviationHistoricPhotoGallery1946.asp
>No official caption/date/photo number; photographer not listed.
>The Coast Guard experimented with placing an E2C Hawkeye's radome on a C-130 airframe and the modified aircraft was designated EC-130V. The experiment was an effort to create a reconnaissance and command-and-control aircraft primarily in response to the service's renewed emphasis on interdicting smuggling through the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico. Budget pressures led to an end of the 11-month experiment and this airframe was transferred to the Air Force.
>>30266560
America
Fuck yeah
>>30261062
>this mini-76 will never see the light thanks to curry niggers
Wat
>>30262611
That would be the C-5. Followed by C-17
>>30261380
XC-99
>>30261380
I don't know anything about airplane design but from what I've learned on /k/ over the years, but wouldn't the wings being that far back really fuck with the center of gravity when it's loaded up?
>>30268189
just don't load it too far at the front
>>30268003
big ass fucker
>>30268579
>>30268594
>>30268606
FAAAAAT BOTTOMED GIIIIIRRRRRLS YOU MAAAAKE THE ROCKIN WORLD GO ROUNNNND
>>30263211
What's the biggest load you've squeezed inside her?
>>30268772
Those bucket-crane trucks for fixing light poles and shit. It was for hurricane relief on the east coast. Second behind that would be artillery or land bridges. BIG OL BITCHES
>>30264793
Seems like it would be really easy to replace it with a 777-based tanker, but I'm surprised how far off those plans are.
C...can I play?
>>30271412
Sure.
No love for big girls?
vatniks made some crazy big helicopers aswell
surprised someone else hasn't already added this..
>>30275044
>BLADES FOR THE BLADE GOD
>hot Russian girl getting filled with hot Canadian loads
>Kabul 2006
>>30260620
Definitely not.
>>30266482
>>30266511
I know that museum, Atwater, California. Quite a decent selection of planes for such an unknown place.
>no AN-22
pigs, all of you.
>>30280029
she's a big lady.
>>30260740
pretty obscure taste you have there.
>>30261062
Vatniks never produced An-12 to begin with. Antonov bureau is Ukrainian, based in Kiev.
2fast2furious, tactical airlifter style.
no love for the derpiest bomber of them all?
>>30262615
When the very first prototype was being weapon tested in flight, they blew away the flaps when the cannon fired.
>>30262664
The sound Tu-95 (and it's civilian twin Tu-114) used to make was something to experience. When that thing flew overhead at cruise altitude, it filled the whole world, you'd be in the basement and still hear it.
>>30262949
The flying forehead.
>>30263546
I saw this pair flying a few hundred meters above my head, shortly after takeoff. To this day, I remember how unbelievably quiet it was.
>>30280139
It may be a bomber, but it's remembered as a tanker: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Black_Buck - fourteen Victors were engaged to fuel just one Vulcan.
>>30262882
heard you like to airlift so we put airlift in your airlift...
mfw walked through one of these bitches at an air show when i was a kid
mfw it was before digital cameras and i don't have any neat pics
mfw no face
BIGGEST GIRL COMING THROUGH
>>30280343
That's a lot of effort for one bombing run
>>30259975
Wouldn't the tank driver panic?
>>30280139
I'm mostly into lolis myself but...
who IS she?!
>>30261126
Because we use the C-130 for that role.
>>30261126
Center of thrust is above center of mass, leading to a constant tipping-forward behaviour that must be corrected with the elevators.
Go play some simpleplanes or from the depths to see how it works out
c-5 is my plaifu
>>30280121
And yet Antonov was born near Moscow.
Claiming something to be Ukrainian, just because it was relocated to Kiev during soviet times - isn't actually that true.
It would be much more correct to simply call it what it is - a soviet plane.
>>30280126
muh dick
>>30280343
Was that really necessary?
>>30282636
According to those participating, yes. Read the link.
It worked.
>>30261285
Man those big old turbofans. Fucking siiiick.
>>30280139
Fucking don't talk about my planefu like that.
I actually married a girl called Handley and damn she's as sweet as the Victor.
If I made an airforce it would be filled with Victors and F-104s.
>>30280479
Get your fancy jetski out of here.
>Not posting best big girl
Fast, deadly, drop dead gorgeous.
>>30283058
Variable sweep wings are pure sex
No love for Sarah plain and tall?
>>30260867
>rolling takeoff
>sleek
In your dreams.
>>30266573
Looks like that prototype Nazi jet that was basically a suicide ball.
>>30274008
THIS WHOLE FUCKING THREAD HAS BEEN BIG ASS BITCHES
THERE IS OBVIOUSLY LOVE FOR BBW AIRCRAFT
>>30261126
There are several reasons. Firstly what
>>30282189
said is true, the thrust and the drag are out of line, creating a nose down pitching moment. This means you (generally) need a larger tail surface to compensate, but by moving the centre of mass around you can change that to an extent.
Also it is much easier to maintain engines mounted below the wings, as they are closer to the ground and can be removed more easily if necessary.
And lastly, when designing a wing, you want to keep the flow over the top of the wing as uninterrupted as possible, whereas the flow over the underside of the wing can be interrupted with stuff and it has a much lesser impact. This is why missiles, fuel tanks etc are nearly always mounted below the wings. I imagine that because of this there are aerodynamic reasons why having the engine and its nacelle above the wing is undesirable.
>>30280063
For you. It's also a trap (look at the front landing gear)
>>30281139
That is a Handley-Page Victor. It was one of the three RAF "V-bombers" (the other two being the Vulcan and Valiant).
The V-bombers were strategic (nuclear) bombers meant to bolster the UK's Cold War nuclear deterrence. But like the USAF's post-B-52 projects (like the B-58, XB-70, and B-1A), they were all removed from combat service and cancelled production once ICBM, IRBM, and SLBM technology became feasibly accurate and cheap.
Victors were converted to tanker duty and used in the Falklands campaign while Vulcans did some conventional airstrikes.
>>30282797
>If I made an airforce it would be filled with Victors and F-104s.
Why? F-104s are just point-defense interceptors (not even fighters), a role effectively replaced by long range missiles. They have no tactical value whatsoever.
I can understand Victors with avionics and engine upgrades. Have a fleet of tankers and fleet of bombers I guess.
But if you're going to use a fighter, you should go with BBWs there too, like F-15s (air superiority and Strike Egles), Flanker types (which are almost as long as a 737), Superbugs (which are as big and have a heavier dry weight than an F-15), and F-4s for fast tactical bomb trucks.
>>30288795
>>30288795
she's a big girl too! She'd do well for an air force
>>30288795
She's a biggun, but she's a great air defense interceptor. She's also really smart; she can multitask
>This is big, I swear it is!
We want REAL BIG, not comparatively big.
>>30289246
The Gannet is, in the most accurate and eloquent terms I can possibly use to describe it...
...a big, fat, bitch.
>>30260613
Too bad Russians are phasing them out. Good news is that the South Africans have a modernized version!
>>30262830
That's a sexy plane. Took a moment to learn more about it and watch a few videos. Thanks.
>>30266573
Ah. He's happy.
>>30292083
Hurr...C5 hungry...hurr
I didn't know Michelle Obama could fly
dont die on me thread
>>30295331
>tfw never fall asleep inside a massive flying boat next to a qt in 1950s underwear while being sang a lullaby of radial engines
>>30280121
>Vatniks never produced An-12 to begin with.
That would be TAPO in the Uzbek SSR. Most Antonovs were built there, or in Ulyanovsk and Kazan.
>>30259536
>>30261062
Because you have MS-21 now. Just make cargo modification and forget about curryniggers.
>>30286570
This meme needs to die.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N637M683CqI
>>30286570
>>30296086
What's a rolling takeoff for, and why's it a meme/why does the hind need it ?
>>30296237
Bump . I want to know too
>>30296817
>>30296237
not much into helicopter, but it is said that the hind needs a rolling takeoff when heavily laden, and cant actually take off vertically
Thicc Japanese QT
>>30263453
That airframe is still able to be completed. Last i heard, the hanger to build the an 225 is still in use and currently controlled by ilushin.
>>30259536
mah waifu
>>30299933
see, this guy knows his shit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov4epAJRPMw
>>30295331
"Honey, can you move the Tupolev so I can get the MiG out? I'm gonna be late for work"
>>30300934
>tfw i will never go to work at mach 3
why do i even live for
>>30299933
Triple dubs for Flight of the Phoenix.
>>30282189
Kerbal with Farrem Aerospace and Advanced Engines is a better choice, but Simply Planes works.
>>30295962
A rather more challenging load with one of these.
