Find a flaw....
>Protip: you can't
>>30256195
Paying HK prices when you can pay a lot less for a M&P or a Glock and still get the same thing.
M&P and Glock are not even in the same ballpark
It's not a chiappa rhino
>>30256262
Was interested in one, but can't get over the line of the extension, and 2" .357 is near 9mm power levels.
>>30256195
>.40
done
>>30256224
>getting the same thing from striker fired pistols as a hammer fired
Not even once broham
>>30256195
>ergos are meh
>safety can be bumped by the thumb during firing
>ridiculously high bore axis
>proprietary rail
>.40 S&W for why
Other than those, it's breddy gud.
>>30256333
>>ergos are meh
do you have lady hands?
>>safety can be bumped by the thumb during firing
reasonable, however a bit of a blanket statement of any framemounted safety.
>>ridiculously high bore axis
This isnt a sig buddy.....
>>proprietary rail
legit
>>.40 S&W for why
STOPPIN POWAHHHH thats why. The LOLonly40 meme doesnt exist for a reason.
>>>/MACtorturetest/
>>30256333
What's wrong with .40 S&W?
>>30256195
>.40
>Hogue grip
>Manual safety
>Price
>>30256396
It's not granddaddy's war horse 45 and it is not the 9mm PROVEN!!!! Even though there are tons of LEO and Feds packing .40 S&W
>>30256371
>do you have lady hands?
Slightly, but I prefer my VP9 (best) and G19 over the USPT
>reasonable, however a bit of a blanket statement of any framemounted safety.
That's fair.
>This isnt a sig buddy.....
And? It's high as shit. Luckily, the recoil spring assembly and forward weight keep the muzzle flip low.
>STOPPIN POWAHHHH thats why. The LOLonly40 meme doesnt exist for a reason.
40 is for making major at USPSA, nothing more.
>>30256195
It's not in 10mm Auto like the USP was originally meant to be when HK was making it mostly for FBI use alongside the MP5/10.
>>30256333
>>30256371
Ergos are phenomenal (you have never held one)
That is not always a safety, can be bought and can be modified in many variations to include decocker only.
Bore axis is subjective and a garbage argument.
The USP .45 is bretty gud, so is the 9mm. Why the USP .40 rocks is because there had never been and to my knowledge has never been another pistol developed from the ground up for the .40 caliber cartridge. Note, there are no USP "glocknade" stories. No major malfunctions, or bad batches. The USP series was developed for the .40 caliber cartridge. Read up on the stress tests to include multiple rounds being fire through a plugged barrel.
If you want a pistol that meets any of these criteria- It has to be a USP .40
>Iconic HK product with strong military influence
>Pistol made for the .40 caliber cartridge, not pistol modified for the .40 caliber cartridge.
>Polymer pistol with Browning style (very hi-poweresque) type mechanics and even ergonomics.
>Field tested to be reliable.
>Modifiable and interchangeable (while HK parts are expensive and hard to obtain compared to other brands, a Base USP can be modified in so many ways from sights to barrels, triggers to decocker/safety, to magazine wells and overall function (DA/SA)
>>30256385
When did he test a USP? Only thing I remember is the VP9.
>>30256309
Pretty much this OP is an autist
>>30258868
>include multiple rounds being fire through a plugged barrel
>>30258868
wow are you actually retarded or just pretending?