favorite prototypes, paper designs or never mass produced
XB-19
>>30201149
>I have the weirdest boner
YA-7F
>Stretched fuselage
>F100 afterburning engine
>>30201292
>>30201303
I wish this made out of testing. It just looks so much better than any other helo out there. And that rotating seat for the weapons officer is faux-future as hell.
>>30201114
what a sexy beast.
unfortunately ALL outdoor exhibits suffer the ravages of exposure to the elements.
The USN could have had a medium range stealth attack aircraft in service by the late 1990's but Cheney cancelled it. As it stands the USN still can't into stealth.
>140mm
>40mm coax
T-80 mk.2 that could have been.
>The tank was based on the T-80's chassis, using a new turret, and was armed with a 152.4 mm rifled gun.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_292
>>30201541
what is it, i want it
>>30201541
What was that thing's proposed ammo load? 2 rounds of 140 and 3 of 40?
T-90 that could have been.
>A particularly notable feature was the rejection of the T-64 hull design. The redesigned layout took up more space, but positively affected ergonomics and protection from the glacis plate. Due to lengthening of the hull's nose section, the driver's position was lower, with his optics attached to the roof of the hull, unlike in the T-64 and its derivatives. This remedied a notorious weak spot of the T-64 design - the section between the turret and the hull.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_187
>>30201561
Swedish Strv 2000
MBT concept in the late 80s/early 90s.
We bought Lopard 2A5S instead.
>>30201565
29 rounds of 140mm ammo, and 148 rounds of 40mm.
It was to based for this world.
>>30201591
>29 rounds of 140mm ammo, and 148 rounds of 40mm
Geez, that seems like a lot for a vehicle of that size. Where do they put it all?
Soviet Armata that could have been. A universal combat platform basis for a family of AFVs developed in the 80s.
>>30201648
I always thought it was pretty cool how both the US and the USSR had basically the same idea at around the same time. I wonder if there's any direct influence between the two projects.
>>30201610
It was to have a separate ammunition storage with blowout panels in the rear of the tank.
>>30201671
Oh, really? That's cool.
Thanks for sharing that. If you have any other information/pics of this thing, I'd love for you to post them!
I don't have much to offer in return, but here's something you might like.
>>30201668
Don't think so, I believe they are pretty different.
>>30201648
>>30201668
FMV of Sweden also projected this in the late 80s with the studies for the Strv 2000. It however never got of the drawing board.
>>30201695
I'm sure the technical details are different, but the general layout is the same. That's the interesting bit to me.
It's also pretty cool how the Armata is essentially the production version of these concepts.
>>30201697
How did they intend for the guns to be fed/reloaded?
>>30201681
There is quite a bit, check out this link.
http://www.ointres.se/strv_2000.htm
Its in Swedish but there is a lot of pics.
Noice webm btw, is that a T-72B?
>>30201292
Oh my darling Cheyenne, what ass you would have destroyed...
>>30201727
Im not sure, but I assume the gun had to be rotated so that it will be parallel to the chassies. 140mm ammunition would probably be fed from the hatch behind the turret ring. It seems impractical and might be a reason this never even made it to prototype stage.
Here is another intresting thing spawned from FMV in the early 70s
>>30201729
>http://www.ointres.se/strv_2000.htm
Thanks!
>Noice webm btw, is that a T-72B?
I'm not sure, perhaps someone else knows.
>>30201767
>Here is another intresting thing spawned from FMV in the early 70s
That safety bar over the driver's head is pretty amusing.
>>30201697
Soviets made this one, but is was essentially what the file name says - artillery on light chassis.
>>30201729
>Noice webm btw, is that a T-72B?
Most likely T-72M.
>>30201114
Pershing turret Sherman
look it up would have been awesome
>>30201866
>what kind of crew ergonomics you want, senpai?
>just
>>30201797
Indeed, we put them on pretty much all our light vehicled in the army to, as we soon understood that it was much easier than actually getting conscripts to drive safely.
>>30201807
>152mm direct fire.
Would fuck up your day. Large caliber assault guns are rare and impractical today but they are still cool as shit.
>>30201830
Oh, thanks!
Any idea what ATGM it is?
>>30201861
good choice of ship
Picture the scene:
We're standing in the divided city of Berlin, the year is 1989
The cold war is coming to its conclusion and we are about to witness a part of that. It's a moment that will go down in history and live forever in the hearts of those who witnessed it.
Famous phrases like "Ich bin ein Berliner" and "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" echo through your mind.
As the first symbolic strike lands, everyone is expecting a piece of wall to be chipped off, however on closer inspection all that's happened is my knackers have been detached and destroyed by a heavy hammer blow.
In fact I had buried myself inside the Berlin Wall decades before and flopped my hairy ballsack out at just the right moment to have them smashed into a fine paste.
>>30201904
>Indeed, we put them on pretty much all our light vehicled in the army to, as we soon understood that it was much easier than actually getting conscripts to drive safely.
Is this actually true or are you pulling my leg?
I wish the T-14 took more after the Object 490.
Also, does anyone else really enjoy the Object designation used by the Soviets/Russians? There's not as much translated information about many Soviet experimental tanks and prototypes, so the Object designation adds such a significant flare of mysteriousness that I can't help but enjoy it.
>>30201936
This is true. Or well, to say that "most" of them had it might to over exaggerate a bit, but the logic behind installing rollcages due to conscript retardation is true.
>76mm at 120 RPM
>>30201992
Just seems like the placement is there more to guarantee the safety of the vehicle than it is the safety of the occupants.
>directly over the driver's head by just a few inches
Hope nobody taller than the guy in the picture ever has to drive it, or that they never hit any small bumps at any kind of speed.
>>30201965
I like the Object designation, especially since so many of their vehicles look like they were designed by redneck aliens.
>>30202145
such a happy plane
>>30202057
If they only cared about the vehicle then they might aswell but the rollcage much further down cant they?
It all started with someone saying that the armys vehicles was unsafe to drive. The army tried to learn people not to drive like retards but failed and instead said fuck it and just installed rollcages on everything to keep less people from dying.
>>30201706
The general layout is different, but the concept itself was somewhat up in the air at that time. Soviets have been experimenting around the idea of an unmanned turret since mid-70s or so, but these were all different designs. Object 299 was Soviet Armata in the sense that it was an attempt to not only introduce an unmanned turret, but also to create a universal platform. However the exact Armata predecessor from which it was directly derived is Object 195 developed since late 80s.
The lack of a KV-6 disgusts me.
>>30202232
always a cool idea, but it wasn't a "real" Prototype
>>30201904
Before that there was another similar project called Vika, a 152 mm D-20 gun on light chassis. But it just wasn't enough and so the idea to use 2A36, the most powerful 152 mm gun they had, has resulted in what you can see on that pic above.
>>30201904
>Any idea what ATGM it is?
BGM-71. IIRC they later confessed they stuffed the tank with explosives. Not that otherwise the result would be much different anyway, T-72M had no protection from top attacks whatsoever.
>well we can't seem to fit the entire recoil system inside the turret
>throw that shit on the roof!
>>30202461
>IIRC they later confessed they stuffed the tank with explosives.
Tanks *are* stuffed with explosives. It's called ammunition.
On top of that, the fact that the thing penetrated the armor is the important bit, not what happened next. You can't shoot two giant shaped charges through the top of a tank and have nothing happen to it. You're going to hit something or someone important regardless of how much boom is packed inside.
But go ahead and slavaboo it up, I guess.
>>30201965
That's Object 490A though. Object 490 is pic related, they wanted to cut the crew to just two people. And yes, I do enjoy this designation style.
>There's not as much translated information about many Soviet experimental tanks and prototypes
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B8_%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
Use the google translator, Luke.
>>30202473
>>30202494
the MBT70 is the tank I love to hate. the best worst tank ever.
>>30202523
>Reading comprehension
Relax.
>>30202565
Yep, you got BTFO.
>>30202586
There is no reason to be upset. Next time try reading posts you are replying to.
>>30202647
Perhaps you could try explaining to me what part of your shitty post I misread, rather than attempting to derail the thread with your whiny nonsense?
You got BTFO, deal with it. It's just the internet, you're not going to get your chicken tendies taken away or whatever you're currently panicking about.
Speaking of unmanned turrets, here's Object 450, the so-called T-74, developed in the early 70s. It was probably one of the first Soviet steps in this direction.
>>30202682
The last sentence of it, my dear pretentious minor. Take a deep breath and drink a glass of water before you get a heart attack.
>>30202724
Do you behave this way in real life too?
>>30202724
>The last sentence of it
the one where you explicitly agreed with what he said? why are you melting down about something you both agree on?
>>30202729
Trying to be tolerant to pretentious yelling children? Yes.
>>30202742
>"owls are gay AND the sky is blue"
>"owls aren't gay, and the sky is blue"
>"ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY SAY THE SKY IS BLUE"
>"we were talking about owls"
>"FUCK YOU THE SKY ISN'T BLUE I SAID IT WAS BLUE YOU CAN'T SAY IT'S BLUE TOO"
>"owls m8"
>"YOU ARE AUTISTIC"
>>30201892
Is that a Jackson turret on a chafee hull?
![otomatic[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/onvOLkg.jpg "otomatic[1].jpg")
hey guys what's going on in this thread
>>30202806
You're a little late to the party, friend. >>30202031
>>30202742
Yes, that one, which refutes your whole demented stream of consciousness about me getting BTFO by you posting essentially the same argument, only flavoured with underage nerd anger. Peace out.
>>30202827
>Flak for ants
>>30202830
>he's still replying
>>30202849
Still can't just let it go, I see? It's okay, next time simply make sure you've read the post you are going to reply to.
>>30202884
>he's still replying
>even in the complete absence of any meaningful content, and despite responding to an entirely different person, he's still replying
what is it like to be this insecure?
>>30202911
Just let it go and move on, anon. It is okay to be wrong. No need to be upset.
Stealth F-14
It is both right and wrong at the same time.
>>30202928
you haven't even explained why the other anon was "wrong" yet
>>30202461
>IIRC they later confessed they stuffed the tank with explosives
[citation needed]
>>30201546
And here's what to come extent can be called T-80 mk.3 that could have been.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Eagle_%28tank%29
>>30202461
>they later confessed they stuffed the tank with explosives.
Yeah, that's called ammunition.
>>30202981
He was wrong by implying he somehow got me BTFO by essentially agreeing with me.
>>30202997
Do you know what "IIRC" means? I remember reading about it somewhere some time ago. Like I said, not that it matters much.
>>30203034
"Stuffed" as in more than the usual ammunition loadout, dumbass.
>>30203048
In other words, you were BTFO.
Thanks for the clarification.
>>30203068
>more than the usual ammunition loadout
[citation needed]
>>30203072
I think you need to calm down and let it go, anon. Being this upset can not be healthy.
>>30203083
Do you know what "IIRC" means? I remember reading about it somewhere some time ago. Like I said, not that it matters much.
>>30203098
>Like I said, not that it matters much.
Then why have you spent two hours desperately attempting to control the damage from your shitty uncited post?
If you just close the thread, you won't have to continue defending yourself. Yet here you are, having a complete mental breakdown over something this simple.
>>30203085
>>30203098
>the post times are so close together that anon is obviously using the (auto) feature
I've never seen someone this upset about something so trivial.
You said something incorrect, refused to back it up, and now everyone is dumping on you for being an idiot. You should admit your situation. There would be more dignity in it.
>>30201222
>that never were
>picture of command Porsche Tiger that saw combat
>>30203164
Thread also says prototypes.
only one Tiger P was made, the rest were merely chassis that were converted into the Ferdinand, that's not mass produced.
>>30202805
yes, but more specifically the T24 Chaffee prototype hull the one with the stronger engine but on the downside the transition wasn't good
>>30202031
>>30202806
IT LIVES!
>>30201382
thing is super rad but it probably wouldve been a bit useless in todays combat of hiding off afar whilst spying on mudslimes to hellfire
cheyenne was made to zoom around
>>30203122
It's an argument against which my "not that it matters much" notion was aimed, dumbass. In other words, I pointed out that it doesn't matter anyway.
The real question is why can't you let it go and move on. I mean I guess getting self-owned because of your inability to read posts you are replying to must hurt, but still. Peace out, anon. There's no reason to be upset.
>>30203145
>You said something incorrect
Do you know what "IIRC" means? I didn't insist on it being some sort of a fact that I state or agree with, dumbass, I insist that it does not matter whether it is true or not.
Anybody
>>30203327
yes
fun game
>>30203319
Cite your posts or fuck off already. People like you are why global warming exists.
>>30202806
>hey guys what's going on in this thread
Oh you know, just scamming the tax payers with something that should work but doesn’t.
>>30203393
U.S. M24 Chaffee with German interleaved road wheels and half-track tracks.
Wow, not one post about Canadians whining about their fucking plane.
>>30203393
I saw one of these in a museum once and it looked so stupid and hacked-together that I thought it was some sort of sandnigger bringback from Iraq.
>>30203373
Cite that it doesn't matter how many explosives were stuffed into the tank because it was penetrated by the top attack anyway which was the whole point of the test? Take your meds, anon.
>>30203407
>>30203420
Your stupid.
>>30203444
that's not the T29 i'm familiar with
>>30203461
>>30203164
>or never mass produced
>>30203484
>>30203499
>>30201330
>>30203513
>>30203563
>>30201510
It's operational.
>>30203593
>>30203712
>>30203427
Wow, this isn't even goalpost-moving. You're just inventing an entirely different argument out of whole cloth.
Cite this you fucking retarded piece of shit:
>>30202461
>IIRC they later confessed they stuffed the tank with explosives
Just fucking cite it. How are you this fucking stupid that you can't handle a simple fucking task like that, and instead you whine and bitch and piss and moan and cry for five fucking hours about it?
The only thing you've done is go "I dont wanna" and "you are mad at me for being a faggot, so I win", which is not how the real world works.
i wish the Tillman Class Maximum Battleships were put down, would've been absurd
also do you think any are going to be in WoWS
i think Tillman I and Tilman III are the most likely candidates. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_battleship
>>30201924
>>30203416
which planes is that?
and i'm guessing that's a good thing
>>30203563
goddamn a mile of fucking tanks at Aberdeen back in the day.
some prick made fun of the fact that i had 20 rolls of film to develop.
yeah kids i'm a old geezer.
i saw the armor mile though.
>>30203893
AVRO ARROW BEST PLANE FUCK BOEING FUCK LOCKMART SHILLS CF-18 IS PIG F-35 IS PIG DISGUSTING
this or any other screw-truck
>>30203928
kek
>>30203762
So I see you still didn't learn to read the posts you are replying to? Just how hurt must you be to omit it not once, but twice and furthermore now obviously deliberately? So let me school you once again then if you insist so much: the post you are referring to directly states that it does not matter whether what I recall reading about the tank being excessively stuffed with explosives is true or not. Still, I strongly recommend you tanking your meds. Your condition raises concerns.
>>30204045
So are you admitting that you don't have a source on what happened during the test and , thus, your claim is doubtful?
>>30202470
M8, those cylinders are to hold the weight of the gun, they don't help recoil.
>>30204148
I repeat my question, do you know what "IIRC" means? I never insisted that it's true, I insist that it doesn't matter how many explosives were stuffed into the tank because it was penetrated by the top attack anyway which was the whole point of the test. Seriously anon, take your meds before it is too late for you.
>>30202528
Actually went and had Google translate the wiki and it wasn't half bad at all.
Same the 490's mainstay characteristics never caught, they're aesthetic as fuck.
>>30201292
>>30201303
>>30201382
daily reminder the AIR FORCE is solely responsible for the Cheyenne being dropped, just so they could cuck Army Aviation's combat role.
>>30202269
>>30203913
damn has it been 25 years today even?
just in time for the Desert Storm victory parade too.
http://www.c-span.org/video/?18328-1/national-victory-celebration-parade
>>30203230
First 5 seconds of this need to be edited with "ABANDON THREAD" on it.
>tfw no 37mm gatling gun
>>30203416
>>30203928
>>30203956
EAT SHIT NIGGERS
>>30204678
no, you eat shitski, mapleov
>>30204207
>Oh shit, he pointed out that I'm fucking retarded!
>Ummm, hmmm. What do I do. What do I do! Come on, anon, THINK!
>I know, I'll tell him that he needs to be medicated!
>Looks like I've just won the argument again, all without ever actually having to argue anything. Nice work, me!
Just a reminder that you've been talking about this for seven hours.
The strangest boner I have ever experienced.
>>30203712
>>30204804
You keep omitting the fact that you have once again failed to read the post you have replied to several hours ago. Just accept it, anon. It will help you to let it go and move on. It and the meds you desperately require to take.
>>30203868
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_battleship
"Senator Tillman had grown impatient with the navy's requests for larger battleships every year as well as the navy's habit of building battleships significantly larger than Congress authorized. He accordingly instructed the navy to design "maximum battleships", the largest battleships that they could use."
> Okay you fuckers, just go "Maximum Battleship", I don't care anymore.
>>30204984
kek, pretty much
>>30203868
>24 16" guns
Its a damn shame it was never made
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrYhiNhp-L0
>>30205021
it would've been "Shock and Awe" for shure
>>30202565
>[cowbell intensifies]
>>30205038
>>30205145
it was like Fallout with space age stuff. becoming real but after that no more wacky type shit.
>>30201807
Reminds me of that one picture of a 1911 taped to a roomba.
>>30205038
Saw this in person, It's fucking huge. Also my neighbor worked on this when he was in the Airforce. He said that until the plane got up to cruising altitude it would leak fuel.
>>30205145
>6afterburners
>>30205145
>dat ass
>>30205240
Imagine rebuilding it with todays technology . it would probably actually go to the fucking moon man.
>>30205240
cool, just like the Blackbird
>>30205312
I guess it had something to do with the metal expanding and contracting due to the temperature I could be wrong though.
>>30205360
no, your right. it was made that way so when it flew at such a speed that the heat created would expand the metal, and wouldn't cause damage
>>30204753
Why did you post Soviet F-15 Eagleski?
>>30205399
Cool, I guess I learned something then.
MMEV, a LAV III with a modular turret capable of mounting ADATS, Hellfires, Sidewinders, AMRAAM's, and CRV7 pods according to mission requirements.
>we can design cool toys
>not allowed to play with them
>>30201729
Its either a monkey model (T 72 S) from the Iraq invasion OR its a ex-USSR model.
Its not a T 72 B
Could you imagine if we actually had to invade japan?
>>30202962
Nigger, that's from Xenonauts
![peKBF67[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/zGWkQO7.jpg "peKBF67[1].jpg")
>>30201697
>>30201541
Personally i like this thing more. Had the chance to see it in person last year but couldnt make it.
Anyway 150mm smoothbore autoloader from early 1950s. Turret was never built but the hull was. Was meant to shoot HEAT and HE sabot rounds as its main ammunition
>>30206899
how it would have looked with the turret
>>30201567
Your pic ain't an Object 187.
There were several prototypes with different engine and deck configurations, pic related is one.
Polish BWP-2000, proposed BMP-1 replacement from the 90s.
>>30201114
The Panzer III/IV. A combination of the Panzer III and Panzer IV, it never went into production. I think it looks pretty cool.
>>30207945
>Your pic ain't an Object 187.
Yes it is, more specifically either the 4th or the 5th prototype. You can tell it from the glacis shape, 2A66 gun, welded turret and the absence of exhaust on the left side of the tank.
>>30208062
Actually now that I looked at it more closely, it is specifically the 5th prototype.
>>30201904 its a TOW-2B (BGM-71F)
>>30202461 ofcourse there are are explosives in the tank, it is pretty obvious in the video, it is to simualate the ammo. anyway the point is the TOW-2B set it off. how high the turret went doesn't matter that much
anyone else think Contra-rotating props looks cool
>>30208110
Oh yeah, you're right. Weird muzzle brake gives it away.
Shame they didn't go with the 187 instead of the 188.
>>30208593
Yeah agreed, 187 was such a fucking beast. This glacis gives me a boner.
Might still get this one some day.
Not sure if it's a good idea, but I do love how it looks.
>>30201668
It was a meme back then. Kinda like those dumb heavy tanks in the 1950's using drivetrains from lighter vehicles.
Experimental pre-WW2 designs, anyone?
>>30203407
>something that should work but doesn’t.
>interleaved road wheels
HAHAHAHA
They shouldn't work and they didn't.
>Y'know, we should make this thing more heavily armored
>Good idea, what do you suggest, making a new, lightweight armor package, maybe adopting ERA?
>Nah.. Just add a full meter of the current armor package onto the front, that's good
>BRILLIANT
>>30202806
"I'm just a poor gun, Italians didn't love me."
(He's just a poor gun straight outta Italy)
"Take me in, some military."
>>30204857
what is this and why does it not exist, granted gaint target
>>30202806
I love this weapon.
It has a "little engine that could" vibe to it, underdog written all over it.
>>30203868
i'd love this is wows
>>30202586
now whose fault is it that you jumped on the first thing that made your blood pressure rise ??
>>30201767
>mfw I thought it was a snapped in half vehicle at first.
>>30208898
It's an LVT with a turret stuck on it.
>>30206060
Could they not find something less trashbag looking to plug the muzzle?
>>30210022
probably too lazy
>>30202328
Brits could've had such a badass military had they had not been cucked by labour
>>30209965
You aren't alone.
I'm sad nobody posted this one.
Horten HO 229
>>30210105
Here's another one
>>30210117
But it was and it flew
British KV-2?
The FV4004 Conway.
>>30211766
nah, that is the 4005 stage II. 4004 has a 120mm
also, the idea of lobbing away 200 pound HE projectiles amuses me massively
more "small tank big gun", this is a sherman with a 122mm gun. D25T i think
>>30208021
No hull MG, sloped side armor, and the rather atrocious PZ-4 turret mean it never really would have been notable.
XB-38
It was a B-17 modified by Lockheed to have inline engines in case the R-1820 somehow became an unfavorable engine choice. It preformed better and seemed promising but the project was cancelled when the only prototype crashed due to an engine fire.
It was also way sexier, which is saying something because the B-17 was already sexy as fuck.
>>30208752
>>30208752
It also had a 140 mm cannon.
>>30212311
PLEASE TELL ME WHAT THE NAME OF THIS FUCKING THING IS.
God damn World in Conflict
>>30212617
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lun-class_ekranoplan
>>30212634
THANK YOU
what could have been
if only..
>>30212617
>>30201114
>>30204194
sorry for the stupid question but if those cylinders get hit does that mean the gun can't be elevated?
>>30208708
Holy shit, I never noticed the people standing on it in that fucking picture. That thing is fucking massive.
>>30202756
Wow
The UK's version of the F-16
>>30203230
It still blows me away how fucking neutered the Commanche's flight capabilities are in Arma 3.
This thing was agile as fuck, the in-game "Blackfoot" handles like an Apache or any other old attack helo.
>>30201510
>Cheney cancelled
Because it was taking forever to build and costs were higher than what was budgeted. The govt even took the manufacturer to court, attempting to say that they fraudulently pumped up the plane's specs.
>>30205938
this is a fucking test airplane not a war machine
>>30214645
>nuclear powered tank
what could possibly go wrong?
>>30208657
Make it a body kit for the m1 abrams, and you got yourself a deal.
>>30210105
>>30210117
because this whole thread is nothing but fucking tanks
>>30214645
That tank has a tumor
>>30201680
The F35 is entering full production nigga.
>>30215180
It's not a Toomah!
>>30215138
>Fucking tanks
Interesting concept, less building the damn things.
>>30215138
majority yes, only thing no
look better
>>30203230
Don't make me cry you fucker
>>30201330
Look at that hull. You can't penetrate that shit.
>>30215299
to match the crew
>>30215299
FWUFFIES! TAKE ME TO PASCHETTI-LAND PWETTY PWEASE!
>>30214229
those russians are crazy man
>>30204857
didn't a g.i joe set come from this?
>>30216396
That's an American T-95/T-28
>>30212987
Yeah the gun would go limp
>>30201992
getting a rollcage fitted on my Land Rover in 2 weeks
MFW confirmed for retard consctipt
>>30204418
here you go nigger
>>30203712
>flamethrower Sheridan
this is the best worst idea ever
>>30205235
kek
