does anyone else tend to choose gun based on how they look and not how they operate, or am I the only one?
>>30179332
your post was really shitty
My dad is like that, he only buys guns he thinks are sexy.
I don't share that opinion and hence have a wider selection of guns. My Glock 34 is ugly, but he still shot it during pistol league. Kept the AccuShadow for myself.
Yes
needs to look good
needs to be reliable
needs to be accurate
needs to be powerful
needs to be easy to find ammo for
needs a good trigger
needs a comfortable grip/stock
needs to be well balanced
>>30179332
You can have both.
>>30179332
Not normally, but pic is going to be my first entry into the world of shotguns and aesthetics + a unique action was the primary deciding factor. I'm usually utilitarian. Shotguns are only for sport anyway so I had no problems with treating myself to some art.
>>30181190
Where did you find those grips?
>>30181296
less garbage pic
>>30181315
And here is the reason why.
>>30181335
That looks suspiciously like it's missing a link pin.
>>30179332
It's a half and half for me.
i will not buy a piece of shit even if i really like how it looks, but when comparing two well made firearms that function similarly, i'll usually pick the one that tickles me better.
There's a whole community based around it in /arg/.
>>30181365
Good eye, never noticed it. I see pics where some have them and others that don't.
>>30179332
Your doge is fat.
>>30179332
Why is that dogger so fat? Walk the dogger.
>>30181190
>choosing a cz based on aesthetics
Wew
One of the most beautiful guns I've seen in a while is a pellet gun.
I want a Colt 602 clone solely for it's looks and the interesting historical niche it occupies.
Come to think of it, I only own two of my fifteen guns for exclusively practical reasons.
>>30181335
Full retard achieved
>>30179332
What dog is this?
>>30185327
>imblying
I find it that a lot of the good looking stuff is also good quality. Just seems to be like that most of the time.
All the shit i buy has both those qualities. If it's missing either one, I don't buy it.
>>30181190
>3rd time I've seen you post this in 24 hours
