Consider this,
a select-fire .22 WM rifle with quad stack magazines / large drums, against unarmored targets, and a very high ROF. Urban combat speciality.
>Why?
Less recoil, higher ROF, more capacity, better suppressive fire.
Would you use such a weapon?
>>30041157
>22 WMR
0/10 kid
>>30041177
but why?
>>30041157
Well besides the quad stacked part, isn't what you described the p90?
>>30041196
Well pretty much.
No, I don't drink that kool-aid.
>>30041157
>Less recoil, higher ROF, more capacity, better suppressive fire.
Uhh...
https://youtu.be/SFivB9JJYvk?t=3
>>30041206
Impressive, very nice. Can he do it twice or thrice as fast?
>>30041157
What guarantees unarmored targets?
What about barrier penetration?
>>30041234
IDK I'm just thinking of a modern-age weapon made to kill poor people like the katana.
>>30041227
Yes...
He's got a good trigger and practices.
>>30041245
The poor people in America shoot back.
>>30041254
What about Africans or south Asians? Surely warlords could get cheaper weapons than the AK.
I'd stick with .22lr mainly for how quiet it is compared to .22wmr in urban environments. But rimfire is very dirty so
>>30041261
Not really. This weapon would have to be made, bought in quantity and then stocked for.
You average warlord ain't buying his AK's from CTD or Bud's for 650 bucks, he's buying it from amother group or some other criminal organization by the dozen, hundred or thousand for extremely cheap and the ammunition for these weapons is common and it's not hard to stock for.
If you're killing poor, unarmed peasants in such quantity that you need special equipment to keep costs down then you're probably gonna get deposed or air-struck.
