https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYvwvckK3U4
I know it is an advert for a game but it has some parts that give detail to the vehicle. especially the part where they say Afghanit and not Afghanistan (towelfags BTFO).
Also what is the difference between AESA and APAR (Active Phased Array Radar)?
Also really ugly turret.
>>30037947
>especially the part where they say Afghanit and not Afghanistan
It's a mineral, silly.
>>30037947
>Also what is the difference between AESA and APAR (Active Phased Array Radar)?
None.
Its just a different acronym for the same thing.
>>30037947
>Also what is the difference between AESA and APAR (Active Phased Array Radar)?
>An active electronically scanned array (AESA), also known as active phased array radar (APAR)
Banned in google?
>Also really ugly turret.
Relocate to phallus. Also, that feel when no Gaechka gf.
Literally Sheet Metal
Also what does this hole do?
anyone else find the turret really sexy?
>>30040030
Nope
You must be one of those chubby chasers.
>>30038212
The sheet metal covers the real armor underneath. It is there for LO purposes.
The hole is were rounds are loaded in.
>>30040037
Quit being autistic. The T-14's turret is minuscule compared to any other modern tank.
>>30040103
>The sheet metal covers the real armor underneath. It is there for LO purposes.
Lel
>>30040149
You have to be retarted to think that a modern tank will not have an armored turret. But this is /k/ after all...
>>30038120
Await a second SPY1 had over 20 GUN diodes per array and electronic steering of the receivers you guys need to learn how these things work before you spit out acronyms.
>>30040103
It's not small
>>30040189
>retarted
>>30037947
Is that cunt cosplaying as Gadget or am I imagining things?
>>30040189
>You have to be retarted to think that a modern tank will not have an armored turret.
Welcome to the Armata.
>>30040597
>>30040562
It is.
>>30040641
>Confusing ballistic casing for actual armour
Welcome to /k.
>>30040770
I don't even know what do you mean.
>>30040867
It's clearly visible that you don't.
>>30040597
I KNEW IT
fucking russians
>>30040867
Not him. But what you see on the photo is an early prototype of what later become Armata`s turret. You can see a fucking armored box. All you see on the parade is outer tin cover.
Welcome to real world.
>>30040918
>you can see a fucking armored box
>he thinks this counts as armor today
What is this 1941 again?
>>30040918
>Object 477
>an early prototype of what later become Armata`s turret
Stop posting.
>>30040770
>so thin it can't even protect against shell splinters from 81mm
>have your entire protection and FCS rely upon something that you don't bother to protect against something with less penetrative power than a 7.62 FMJ
Armata
>>30041059
>He keeps confusing ballistic casing for actual armour
/k.
>>30040978
>Object 477
"Molot" actualy inspired Armata`s constructors a lot.
>>30040978
Object 477--> Object 195 --> T-14
That`s how evolution works.
>>30041068
>covering your sensitive electronics in 'ballistic casing' and calling it a day
>have to write on your tank IT'S BALLISTIC CASING NOT ARMOR, DON'T SHOOT HERE!
vatniks
vatniks never change
>>30041211
?
Is there a reason you need to shitpost like this in every T-14 thread?
>>30041288
>slavs shitpost nonstop
>get btfo
>w-w-w-why are you shitposting???
Every single time.
>>30041288
>Turret has no armor
>TURRET HAS ARMOR
>It's tin armor to armor the electronics not the turret
>so the turret has no armor
>well you see it has no armor since it's ballistic casing
>wow vatnik
>w-w-why you sh-shitpost
>>30041348
>Kontakt-5 is sooooooooo undeadable.
>Nato cowards in fear
>Nato gets hands on
>It's actually weaker than what we thought
>Enter machalit armor
>It's soooooo undeadable too
>In after rinsing and repeating.
Enough of these armor memes already.
>>30041499
Personally my favorite is how they now just put the ERA bricks under a thin removable plate in order to make it look like the vehicle has real passive armor.
>>30040770
>It is
No it's not.
Every eastern turret is smaller than western ones. For the last half a century they have generally used the cast frying pan styled turrets. And guess what? The T14 isn't any smaller than them, and we have showed ample ability kill these things at extreme range. Your size argument is invalid.
>>30041530
My favorite is instead of investing in armor that does its job, they spend money on damage control features like ERA and APS at all. Also little unknown fact era gets used up or falls off, APS isn't the stop gap solution to ultimate survivability. Tanks like the Leo, chally, and Abrams will just shrug hits while Easter tanks run a greater risk of being killed.
>>30040189
The T-14 has a very lightly armored turret underneath that shell.
>>30037947
Can someone tell me why having a smaller turret is advantageous? I'm not questioning unmanned turret but why the smaller better?
>>30041557
Americans would be halted at the first river in russia that they couldn't cross
Theres a reason that Russia builds lighter tanks
>>30042050
>Theres a reason that Russia builds lighter tanks
It had a lot to do with poorly thought out infrastructure, in particular the gauge of railroads and the fact that Soviet bridges had Soviet Civilian Quality (patent pending).
>>30041137
No, it did not.
>>30041186
No, that's not how it works. Just because there are different experimental models with the general idea of unmanned turret in mind doesn't mean one was derived from another. Object 195 is related to T-14, but Object 477 has absolutely nothing to do with either.
>>30041211
>and calling it a day
>He keeps confusing ballistic casing for actual armour
>Meanwhile, tanks with manned turrets don't even have such a casing ant simply strap all the sensitive electronics on the top of the turret
/k, /k never change.
>>30041348
Turret has both armour and ballistic casing, dumbass.
>>30041499
>It's actually weaker than what we thought
Meanwhile in real life Kontakt-5 was virtually impenetrable until Americans introduced M829A2 in 1993, two years after the end of the Cold War.
>>30041539
It is, dumbass.
>>30041557
And my favourite is how the US is incapable of developing proper ERA or APS and stuck with the sole option of strapping more weight on already overweight barns.
>>30041839
Cool story, bro.
>>30041957
Reducing turret silhouette reduces hit probability.
>>30041186
>Object 477--> Object 195
Those were made independably by different design bureaus who absolutely refused to cooperate with each other even if specifically ordered to do so. And those tanks have different layout.
>>30042681
>Reducing turret silhouette reduces hit probability.
But with all the guided munitions does it really? Wouldn't a Challenger 2 like unmanned turret protect a big portion of the hull from above and also be completely isolated and not cook people?
>>30042681
>>Meanwhile, tanks with manned turrets don't even have such a casing ant simply strap all the sensitive electronics on the top of the turret
>blatantly making shit up
Oh vatniks, you so hilarious
>>30042681
>30mm steel plates for armor visible in multiple photographs
>c-cool story b-b-bro!
>>30042800
And the crew must get out from the crew compartment in which particular way?
>>30042809
Oh burgers, never change.
>>30042866
Cool story, bro.
>>30043206
>And the crew must get out from the crew compartment in which particular way?
This particular way.
>>30042681
Increasing the replies will strengthen my weak or erroneous points.
I have 9 replies in one post, I am expert.
>>30042050
USA crossed the atlantic ocean, BTFO 4th biggest army in the world in a few weeks and got their ass back all in less of a timeframe it takes for Russia gather enough money to send a vatnik on the internet to shitpost
>>30043206
>posting an image showing a sight that is armored on the top, sides and even has a small armored fucking door for the front to show that the electronics are just thrown out there
kekkest of keks
>>30043454
Every sight has doors, imbecile. The difference is that other tanks simply put them on the top of the turret.
>>30043436
>4th biggest army in the world
North Korea has the largest military in the world. They must be very-very stronk, right? Dumbass.
>>30043588
>argue that western sights are just out there without any kind of protection
>post an image that BTFOs yourself
>get called on it
>bb-b-but of course they do nobody said otherwise!
vatniks are the greatest
>>30043698
>Strap sights on the top of the turret
>Get butthurt when someone figures out to put them under ballistic casing
Fatnik incarnate.
Why are vatniks so bad at understanding their own arguments? It's like they don't even think and just read from a pre-prepared list of propaganda points.
>>30043613
It's pretty well established that Iraq had one of the most powerful Armies in the world in the '90s
It's also pretty well established that Nork does not.
Canada has a more powerful military than the Norks do.
>>30043786
Pretty well established by the CNN? Iraq operated nothing but rustbucket export shit from 50s, 60s and occasionally 70s.
>>30043732
Russian infantry carriers aren't even armored enough to protect the infantry inside.
What makes you think "ballistic shielding" can protect anything against anything that isn't a stone thrown by a child
what next? Russian tanks are impenetrable because the kontakt outer shell is made of "ballistic shielding"
Fuck you, your shitty turret made of poorly fitted together sheets of tin metal gets hit by an MG burst and most of the equipment goes offline.
An explosive happens nearby, most electronics are offline
Hit by HE, everything goes down.
And since "MK1 eyeball" is deemed so useless by the russians, the tank will be completely blind and combat ineffective.
In short, russians somehow made poorly protected russian tanks even more poorly protected
>>30043786
If I gave every man in Britain a gun and a uniform, Britain would not be the largest military in the world, we´d still get steamrolled by literally anybody, especially the US.
Iraq being a powerful military in 1990 is just bollocks, especially considering they just got out of a decade long war with Iran.
>>30043815
Yeah and that rustbucket export shit was state of the art russian tech. They practically imported the PAK FA and T14.
And they retired all their modern russian weapons shortly after war due to the shitty russian engines reaching the end of their 1/2 day life expectancy.
>>30043931
Would now be the largest military*
>>30043613
I guess it must be insanely stronk seeing as russia can't even beat an army they called "shitty, corrupted, no-morale and disorganised", the ukranian army.
How's that ukraine invasion going? Still getting rekt?
>>30043967
>T-55, T-72M, SA-2 and SA-9
>state of the art russian tech
>1991
Why are Americans so brainwashed on the matter of the Gulf War?
>>30044209
if you think russia could afford anything else during the worst years of their economy you are wrong.
They were on the brink of collapse they had just expanded literally all their resources on keeping USSR afloat and failing, iraq was stronger than russia at that time.
>>30043732
>sheet metal to lower IR/RF signature
>ballistic shielding
>>30044485
this
What are they supposed to shield against.
It'd have trouble shielding against an airgun pellet
>>30044480
>Implying implications
>What the fuck is T-72B/B1989, T-80U, SA-10, SA-12, SA-15, SA-19, SS-21, SS-23 etc.
Why, fatnik? Why are Americans so brainwashed on the matter on the Gulf War? Answer the question.
>>30044618
Maybe because they went across the atlantic and turned worlds 4th biggest army into 126th biggest army in a matter of weeks, making it one of the, if not the most flawleslly conducted operations in history of mankind
While russia struggles with a weak country nextdoors
>>30044749
>4th biggest army
North Korea has the largest military in the world. They must be very-very stronk, right? Dumbass.
>>30044927
I'm not even going to bother arguing with a nationalist whose righteous and always right homeland has problem winning a war right nextdoors and is deathily mortified of NATO and butthurt about everyone jumping ships instantly once CCCP collapsed.
>>30045216
>wow someone saw through my shitty vatnik cover
>time to send them to pol
>russian morals have been defended!
