EAM/Skyking Messages
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
So, I saw earlier today a thread where some guy was panicking (slightly) about hearing a double Skyking message, and upon more research, have become curious.
Would the following video (as an example) be accurate in regard to how these messages are formatted and sent?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EULD1HRtIPw&ab_channel=MillionFoul
In other words: Tinfoil HAM bunker thread?
>>30003069
It was a single Skyking.
A double would be:
SKYKING, SKYKING DO NOT ANSWER
SKYKING, SKYKING DO NOT ANSWER
and then the rest of the code. At least that's how I understand it.
Skyking and the rest of the HFGCS is probably outdated / a backup system nowadays anyway. They're not sending go/no go codes over something that can be listened to by some jerkoff with a HAM radio in his garage.
>>30003317
To be fair, I believe the codes are nonsense turned into more nonsense. I think the command acts as a key for decoding what they have on board the aircraft or something like that.
>>30003317
One time cipher codes meant for singular entities. Good luck figuring stuff out that only exist in 2 copies.
>>30003317
>>30003429
Yeah, what he said!
Is there a recording of the most recent broadcast anywhere?
I keep seeing people talk about it, and there are youtube and vocaroos of others, but I haven't heard today's yet.
>>30003545
I imagine someone records them, but I couldn't really find any online.
>>30003622
There are a couple floating on Youtube.
The recent one was slight different from the one's I've heard though. Every other one was "SKYKING, SKYKING DO NOT ANSWER" + a random garble of NATO phonetic letters and numbers, and occasionally an authentication and a signoff from either Oufett, Anderson, or whatever the hell has the callsing "Mainsail".
The meat of the text in this one was "SEAHAWKS 207" + an authentication, and a signoff from the callsign "Ricochet."
What frequencies are these usually on?
>>30003904
I can't find anything on those callsigns, but I felt like I saw them before. I believe that those must be two different ground installations, likely C2 assets making sure the system is working between them.
>>30003935
Not sure if these are accurate, but they look right.
>Primary HFGCS Frequencies 24 Hours: 8992 and 11175
>Back up HFGCS Frequencies Day: 13200 15016
>Back up HFGCS Frequencies Night: 4724 6739
>>30003904
Ricochet might be an airborne command aircraft?
>>30004317
Right on, I have a decent SDR setup, might try to do some recording this weekend.
>>30003069
What does all this mean? I've seen this before...
>>30005750
Sweet, dude, lemme know.
>>30006404
>>30003317
>Some jerkoff with a ham radio receiver
How about any nigger with a browser
websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901
>>30008852
r00d
>>30008852
That's breddy cool mang.
