I'm thinking of getting a SCAR
Does anyone have any opinions or reviews of them?
>>29940319
Memest memegun to ever meme in the memory of the kingdom of memes.
Meme.
>>29940319
They are bretty gud
That is the gun people with no training buy.
Worth it for the 17s, I wouldn't bother with the 5.56 version. After having an AR-10, if I were to get another semi auto 308, it'd be a 17S for sure.
>>29940363
Buck angel pls
>>29940319
I love mine
/k/ says the heavy version is solid.
>>29940319
Accurate like a fucking video game, lightweight, and modular. If you can afford one with sufficient ammo to shoot with, buy it.
isn't it just an overpriced AR-18?
>>29940846
>just
JUST
>>29940319
>buy two
>sell one in 2017 for $5k
>>29940319
My ex left a lot of scars, fwiw.
>>29940319
SRT (different name for SWAT in case you're an autist) operator here. My agency purchased SCAR's for our team last year. While I like heavy rifles personally, these are stupid heavy, especially for their size. Also, our firearms fgts fucked with the gas systems and slowed down the rate of full auto so much that they end up jamming more often than not. I gave mine back and use my 10.5" M4 back. Long story short, don't waste your fucking money.
>>29941052
This post is so dumb it hurts.
>>29940686
>bait
>>29941052
what? the heaviest SCAR(Mk20 SSR 10.6lbs) is still pounds lighter than a basic bitch FAL. I can't see how a 7.9lbs(16inch), full size battle rifle is considered"stupid heavy" when everything else in it's class weighs more.
>>29941052
You are not an operator, you are a fucking idiot pig. Please do not sully the name of special forces operators by claiming to be one
>>29940345
What is the Tavor?
>>29941052
Also it would be a trip fag that is shitposting this hard. I dont even post here much, i just lurk. You should follow that example for now on, or just leave. Stupid fucking pigs i swear
>>29941144
What is the nugget?
>>29941101
Let's just assume he's referencing the 5.56mm SCAR 16 that weighs 7.25lbs. That's "stupid heavy" according to him compared to a Colt 6940 at 6.8lbs.
The notion that you need to reduce cyclic rate on a weapon that only fires 600rpm to begin with is laughable. But let's just pretend that was an actual thing...
It would require the "firearm fgts" to either somehow increase the mass of the bolt carrier or replace the gas jet with a smaller port diameter. Both of which are highly improbable. The only other way to choke the SCAR of momentum is to flip the gas regulator to the suppressed setting without attaching anything to the muzzle to compensate.
Therefore, once again assuming this poster isn't bullshitting out his ass, the only logical conclusion one can arrive at is the simple determination that he is a complete and utter moron who doesn't even know how to work his own weapon.
>>29940319
Good gun. Though the design doesn't get updated with the latest rail types and quick disconnects because the customers want what the government gets in its contract.
It's for people who want to play operator operationally.
Just buy it.
Worst case you hate it and someone else gets a good price on a lightly used SCAR.
>>29940319
1. Absolute fantastic gun, maybe the best.
2. "Normal" people will think you're a just some rich non-shooter who buys stuff they can't afford.
I love mine. Shoots MOA all day, reliable as fuck. Eats any ammo, cleans up well, and starting to get an aftermarket now.
>>29940887
The fuck happened here?
Looks like they shot after they had a squib round or something
Get a Scar H-S. Don't get a lame Scar in 556.
>>29945034
>hating on the SCAR-L
>a gun that shoots 80K rounds of full auto before the barrel starts keyholing
>and 100K rounds before its bolt breaks
When will this meme die?
Tbh tattoos can be just as badass and you aren't taking any risks receiving them.
>>29945100
He wasnt shit talking the reliability.
Theres no point to buy a 5.56 scar when you can get an ar and a couple hundreds of rounds for the same price.
They are good guns, just not exactly price efficient.
If you're the kind of person that has the expendable income to spend a bunch of money on marginally better parts, then go for it. However if you aren't exactly rich, just save yourself the trouble and get a decent AR.
Also don't get the 5.56 version, just wasted potential for long range shooting if you do.
>>29945140
>Theres no point
There is when you don't want to replace the barrel and bolt several times over to achieve the same durability.
>>29940319
fun little rifle
light kick
lightweight
easy as sin to clean
ain't a picky bitch about ammo.
>>29945171
No one here has shot 80k rounds you sperg.
>>29945377
No one here has flown an F-22 or F-35 either, yet we debate the merits of those systems all day. Sounds like you just want to discount a datapoint you can't argue against.
Love mine
3k for a gun chambered in shit weak ass 5.56 is dumb.
I'm going to draw worldwide ire by purchasing a 16.
>>29945112
Clearly you've never seen how bad the infections for those can get.
>>29945377
Assuming you replace the bolt and barrel every 15,000 rounds for your AR, what is the average cost? $400?
Assuming a run of the mill AR15 costs $800 and a SCAR 16 is $2400, you'd need to shoot 75000 rounds for the SCAR to be the better value. That's roughly 300 rounds per month over 20 years.
>>29946473
Buy both
>>29948204
>lever mounts same side as charging handle
Please flip them bitches or replace with LT622's.
>>29948276
Not mine. But I'd go GDI r-com if rolled acogs on mine.
At the range I am judgemental.
But I never ever judge based on gear.
People get judged by their targets and whether or not they muzzle sweep people.
If they can shoot a good as me with a hi-point, then they aren't just my equal, they're probably my superior.
>>29948386
>not stockpiling dillo dust
>not having more bottle openers than bullets
>not being a citizen of the Republic of Texas
>not sucking Mark's dick
>not being part of the Larueminati
I'm all Larue all the time.
>>29948558
I lived in Texas for five years.
Leaving was the best thing I ever did.
>>29940319
daily reminder your SCAR sucks dick.
>>29948956
How many contracts did you loose this month?
>>29948956
only peasants don't own both
>>29948984
buh buh but we didn't send our best rifles! we're still cool right?
>>29949045
SCAR isn't really submoa. Not meant to be.
CSASS was won by top entry really
>>29949517
>SCAR isn't really submoa
u wot m8?
>>29940930
im here for you
>>29949662
Its not really sub moa
The mk20 you posted is totally submoa
>>29949847
That's not a Mk20 broheim. And even if it were, they're both SCARs.
>>29940345
Is that a famas
>>29949912
CSR-20/Mk20 whatever
It has the beefier, more accurate barrel
and extra barrel screws
some other stuff, not quite a SCAR.
>>29949965
>not quite a SCAR
You are wrong and probably dropped on your head as a child.
>>29949987
So your saying you can take the barrel from a CSR20 and put in in a SCAR 17s receiver?
>>29950058
I bet you're the same tard who thinks an AR10 isn't part of the AR family because it uses a different barrel than an AR15
>>29941052
>these are stupid heavy,
>7.9 pounds for the normal length Scar 17
>stupidly heavy
Nigga...
>>29950058
No, what I'm saying is you've proven yourself to be utterly incapable of even the simplest of logical abilities to include basic reading comprehension at a first grade level.
>in before the SCAR PDW isn't a SCAR because it doesn't readily accept a standard Mk16/16S barrel
>in before the FN HAMR isn't a SCAR
>in before the FN FNAC isn't a SCAR
>>29950098
Sure, the CSR20 is a SCAR derivative.
Much like the AR15 comes from an old school AR10, and modern AR10s come from AR15s.
I just take the difference between them to mean its a different rifle. Your looking at broad strokes. And being salty as fuck about it.
>not a SCAR
>totally not a SCAR
>>29950140
I remember this tryhard brand of *YOU MUST USE THE TERMS SPECIFICALLY AS I HAVE INTERPRETED THEM OR ELSE YOUR WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!"
I love your anger though man.
I seriously hope you die a few months earlier because of the stress ive caused you.
>definitely NOT a SCAR guise!
>>29949987
>>29950098
>>29950140
>>29950150
>>29950165
>>29950181
A little mad there son?
>>29950171
>I was only pretending to be retarded
So is that how you admit to being wrong while trying to save face and appear like it was intentional all along?
Why doesn't the U.S Military replace the M-16 with the SCAR family?
>>29950230
Okay... then which is an overall better gun?
M-16 vs SCAR.
>>29950198
Not at all
I consider the FN HAMR to be just that a rifle made by FN of a model called HAMR.
The grenade launcher they put out is called a SCAR too.
Im also not so autistic to give a fuck if someone uses terms differently once I see that they use it differently.
http://www.fnamerica.com/products/carbines/scar-series/
>>29950241
No.
SCAR > M16 on a 1-v-1 kind of basis but logistically it's the M16 and that's why we still have the fucking muskets...
>>29950252
>The grenade launcher they put out is called a SCAR too.
Because it was part of the SCAR program... and wait for it... "SCAR family of weapons"
>Im also not so autistic to give a fuck if someone uses terms differently once I see that they use it differently.
No, you're just autistic enough to insist that the Mk20 isn't a SCAR when everybody to include the manufacturer have declared that it is.
And what's with this "they use it differently" bullshit? Their product nomenclature is fairly straightforward and consistent. Though I shouldn't be surprised a mental invalid like you is having trouble understanding it.
>>29950276
I dont insist
I just use the term differently.
Just because the Manufacturer calls something part of the same group doesnt mean much outside of marketing terms.
Yes the Mk20 and the SCAR 17 are very similar, yes. But I like my terms to have more precision than you do.
>>29950335
>literally
>autism
>the post
Jesus christ dude. I kind of feel bad now for insulting someone with a legitimate case of down syndrome, sorry.
it finally fixed the fundamental flaw of the AR design needing a forward assist. still more money for a fun then you should ever spend except on maybe a long range sniper rifle.
>>29950365
Do you just have ad hominem?
Please tell me your more than just that
Anon please.
Pls
>>29950398
I am sorry you are living the life of a poorfag, maybe one day you will escape the life of poverty.
>>29950440
>attempts at calling out logical fallacy after every point he's made has been thoroughly trounced
>cedes every point ending his autistic tirade with "well I'm a special snowflake that get's to make up my own words and definitions"
You have literally no argument left to stand on. So yes, at this point I am just outright calling you a faggot.
>>29950481
>trounced
You have a funny definition
>>29950522
>You have a funny definition
I have a feeling you fail to grasp the irony of that post.
>>29950539
I have a feeling you have a problem making any connections of value with any other people.
>>29950704
>muh ad hominems
>>29950727
That's all you have let this be.
You have yet to refute anything, the core of your argument is that I'm using the SCAR term to refer to the 16 and 17, and bundling the grenade launcher and mk20/csr20 in with it. That somehow I'm wrong to refer to calling them all together as the SCAR family.
>>29950828
>somehow I'm wrong to refer to calling them all together as the SCAR family.
Hmm, that doesn't sound at all what like what was posted here:
>>29949965
>CSR-20/Mk20 whatever
>not quite a SCAR.
But I give you credit for restating your opponents position and claiming it as your own from the onset, excellent debate logic/gr8 b8 m8.
>>29948956
SR-25 seems overpriced for what it is
I'd take a scar any day
>>29940319
I hear awesome things about it.... I can't afford one to find out.
>>29940319
The gass piston can be a minor bit of a pain to remove for cleaning and they are extraordinarily loud on account of the muzzle break. Other than everyone and their mother wanting to finger fuck it when you break it out that's really the only negative things I can think of.
>>29950474
I would rather build 5 AK's or AR's for that price. The SCAR doesnt have enough bang for the buck. Everyone paying $2k on a 5.56 plastic gun is getting scammed.
>>29940319
Reviews everywhere on the Internet.
>>29940319
m&p 10 is just as good, as is the windham weaponry ar10
>>29940345
Do you post in >>>/g/ by any chance?
>>29940319
I'd love one, but with all the mods and accessories I'd want to do with it, it would end up costing almost $6000 before even buying extra mags and ammo. like others have said, you could build a very nice AR for half that
>>29952746
Comparable AR 10s are priced in the same range as the SCAR.
And you want $3k in accessories? Please tell me that includes optics or that your just trolling.
>>29953371
of course it includes optics
>>29951976
>The gass piston can be a minor bit of a pain to remove for cleaning
Not when you have this.
>>29942909
OD green SCAR?
>>29940357
What kinda accuracy you get out of that
>>29956346
Most SCARs manage just under moa with good ammo. Using a T1 is going to probably be a little wider than that.
>>29940319
I own one and it is good.
>>29956346
>>29956632
Around MOA but I haven't shot it for groups since I swapped the trigger.
>>29957002
ZQi I get 1.5moa
Match ammo I get just under moa.
I have the super scar trigger, couldnt really speak to accuracy before that. I used an aimpoint m4 before it from unsupported positions, got the trigger and magnified optic at the same time.
Waiting for the Mk20 to come out. Been holding my breath for awhile on that one.
>>29941052
people like you actually exist
>>29948956
what's that? I can't hear you through all this left over money I have
to each their own, but the sr25 is overpriced as fuck
>>29957598
Just 20-25%
still
>>29957560
Liars? Yes
>>29940887
Thank god this only happens to scars, any other rifle would just shrug off a squib.
>>29958781
FN just uses cheap barrels
>>29959078
http://fnforum.net/forums/fn-scar-17s/81373-good-news-scar-mk20-civlian-shipping-2-weeks.html
I want to believe
>>29959078
No they don't.
>>29960614
Nice
>>29940319
It's the first issue of a newer concept, however it's progress has been stalled since the army cancelled it's trials. But since it's FN it still rocks, just has some small kinks that need to be worked out in the next release. Namely the reciprocating charging handle, the bulk, and the lack of a bullpup variant. Reliability wise it's solid, but it's not far enough from the AR to justify the price, no matter how outdated the AR is and it most certainly is.
The MSBS and MDR are picking up where the SCAR and ACR left off.
>>29963739
>bullpup
Failed idea. MSBS is having issues getting it to work in a rifle designed for it. MDR is vaporware.
>muh price
Its priced at a similiar price point (often lower), than comparable .308 ARs.
>>29963797
>bullpup
>failed idea
Why not just say every practical idea is failed, like modular rifles in general? The bullpup is great in concept and very close to being great in performance. We're talking about modernization for the sake of practicality and performance here, wasn't that the point of guns like the SCAR? Not to mention the same awesome, innovative company that makes it... (makes a lot of bullpups)
MSBS already exists just not in the States. MDR already took preorders and ships next quarter.
>>29940319
I own a scar H, I love it, reasonably light, very intricate recoil system. The only thing I don't like is the reciprocating bolt, but that's up to preference.
>>29963829
The MSBS does indeed. The standard rifle configuration passed Poland tests. The Bullpup has not. Bullpup isnt particularly practical. You introduce a whole host of issues, just to save 4 or 5 inches of OAL? No thanks.
Well. In some cases the idea is a short as possible OAL. Im not saying that the bullpup is completely terrible. Just that the trade off is not often worth it.
>>29963916
>the trade off is not often worth it
Yeah it is. Better balance too. Just stop investing in grandpa guns while you're ahead.
>>29940319
I shot a 16, I loved it. Lightweight, great shooter, accurate out of the box, all the best parts of an AR made a little better. It's all the better I think as a 7.62, it's hard to argue for a better battle rifle than the SCAR.
Reciprocating bolt handle is the only real downside. That is largely subjective though, but by and large it's disliked, mostly because of the placement and is generally considered the only thing you need to replace with an after-market accessory if you replace anything.
Oh, and the price. Lord almighty that thing is overpriced. If it was under $2,000 I could understand, and it'd probably be a lot more prevalent that way. I can all but guarantee you all the Tavor fanboys would be buying SCAR rifles instead if it was price more competitively.
>>29965109
The SCAR 16S is a good rifle, where as the Tavor is overwhelmingly average.
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_6_24/447078_FN_products_handle_stress_VERY_well.html&page=1
Lots of good FNH knowledge from the owner of Battlefield: Las Vegas.
>>29965163
I prefer Battlefield: 4
>>29963961
The length of pull on that bullpup is ridiculous.
>>29963916
im thinking of SBRing my ps-90, can anyone identify this muzzle device?
>>29963961
I prefer feature rich riflles.
Field adjustable LOP
Interchangeable pistol grips (with more than one or two pistol grips)
last round BHO
Not shit triggers.
An actual aftermarket
Barrel lengths from 10" or less to 20" or more. With handguard extensions available to not have a one size fits all rifle.
And you post the MSBS, and Radom cant even get the bullpup models to pass the polish tests. To be fair, the MSBS looks to be the least worst of the bullpups, if Radom can get it to work properly. If they added an adjust LOP feature, id get one as soon as it hit stateside.
>>29963739
>it's progress has been stalled since the army cancelled it's trials
The SCAR trials were never canceled. FN won the final selection and completed Milestone C of the acquisition process. Or in other words, the SCAR FOW (Mk16, Mk17, Mk13, Mk20) were fully adopted by the US Military.
>kinks
>reciprocating charging handle
It can hardly be labeled a "kink" when that feature was specifically requested by the userbase by which the weapon was being developed for.
>bullpup
Oh I see, you're one of those people...
>>29940319
i shot the scar17 with underwhelming results. the internet has hyped it big time, so in fairness, i think i had almost unrealistic expectations beforehand.
its a great gun but (and i cant emphasize this enough) TO ME it isnt worth the $2600+ price tag. especially now when stock is limited and price has gone up.
now, im sure someone soon will tell me about r&d and manufacturing costs etc. im just saying at its price point, im not interested.
for an investment like this, i highly recommend tracking one down and test firing
>>29963739
Why does everyone suck the MDR's cock? It's not even released?
>>29965267
They think a company known for making high end precision bolt action rifles will be able to engineer, manufacturer, and support a low cost semi auto rifles.
>>29965265
R&D/manufaturing costs have nothing to do with it. FN sells 16s to LE Departments for $999.99 routinely. The reason why the 17s sell for so much, is that the high end .308 ARs also sell for over $2500. The market will bear it. If DD offered their .308 for say, $1750 street price, youd see a $1800 17s.
>>29940319
I have a SCAR 16S and I absolutely love it. I would like to get a 17 soon as well at some point.
>>29965308
lmao hey nice rifle dude
>>29965308
>The market will bear it.
Not to mention the fact these guns are sold before they even roll off the production line. FN has virtually no incentive to lower MSRP.
>>29965354
lol, always fun to see other people posting your pics.
>>29965308
I can understand being excited for a new product, but I can't understand the following process:
>Bullpup rifles suck dick, they're horrible!
>OMG THE MDR PLEASE LET ME CUM NOW DESERT TECH
>>29965675
Its the subset of bullpup fanboys that are clamoring over it. Lionizing something unreleased, untest, is easy. It can be all things to all people. Its not everyone. Its that everyone else who isnt on the hype train couldnt care less about it. They know its not a game change, its probably going to be a non starter. Id be delighted if I was wrong though.
bullpup market in the US is very limited. BP guys dont have a lot to get excited over.
the MDR gives them something new and makes a lot of promises. i guess we'll see
>>29940319
I'm going to give you an honest to god 100% meme-free answer:
Just use the money you put towards a SCAR to buy yourself all the parts to make a top-quality AR-15. It's the exact same thing if not a tad better in performance (but I will agree SCARs are aesthetically pleasing).
>>29966764
>OP post pic of .308 and asks for opinions of the rifle
>Anon says get .223
>>29966833
Or you could get a high quality AR-10 and still apply my answer. Literally not that hard to think of.
>>29966842
Lets just take a look at the high end AR10 prices since your budget is that slim.
Daniel Defense - $2750
LaRue Predatar - $2950
LMT .308 - $3200
KAC SR25 - $3500+ (if you can find one in stock)
Scar 17s? $2650
http://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/products2.cfm/ID/171996/98552/fnh-scar-17s-7.62x51mm-%28308-win.%29-fde-%28le%29
>>29953842
Who sells this? Do want
>>29966911
>Daniel Defense
I don't understand the appeal of a an AR in .308. The modularity of the platform is brutally tourniqueted when you move from .223 to .308. Let alone the price on a largely untested platform.
>LaRue
Why would you buy a rifle from Mark LaRue, ever?
>LMT
It's more of a DMR than a battle rifle, so that's not quite a fair comparison.
>KAC SR-25
I don't know enough about these to comment, but the price tag is too high to interest me.
>>29967186
http://shop.shootingsight.com/SCAR-Punch-piston-removal-tool-SCARpunch.htm
>>29967230
So your not a fan of .308
And the SCAR, or any high end .308 AR can easily be used as a DMR. Cheaper rifles wont be as accurate. Comparing to an LMT or other similar rifles that can be used as a BR or DMR is valid.
>>29967230
>Why would you buy a rifle from Mark LaRue, ever?
Dillo dust
beverage entry tools
>>29950271
Maybe if you're a POG or a Marine, but the real military uses the M4
>>29940345
I think you are confused with any AR
>>29969333
Trips of truth
>>29940319
I like mine, for whatever that's worth
>>29970364
Needs an optic
I was looking for a semiautomatic 308 rifle, and I have a suppressor in .308 that I would like to have a threaded barrel for. I thought about a SCAR but I read that their threading sucks, like it's misaligned and its easy to screw up the threads so I passed.
I ended up getting a Bushmaster. I think the SCAR also had their own magazines, whereas the Bushmaster used the more common pattern (not the Armalite type).
pic related, I'm too assed to find the model number but it looks like this.
>>29970573
forgot pic
I've had a scar for a while, but.......
How do I align the barrel properly?
>>29970468
For sure, that's next on the list after vacation costs this year, trying to narrow down my options. Might just slap a strike eagle on it until I can afford a real optic, then move the eagle to my basic bitch AR
>>29970573
Threading is fine. It's a pencil barrel, some flash hiders need a shim.
http://www.parkermountainmachine.com/store/p113/KBA_Custom_SCAR_17_Shoulder_Ring.html
>>29970595
>How do I align the barrel properly?
What?
>>29970693
I'm stupid and just googled it. Some SCARs came out the factory with barrels torqued to the far right and left, making it a bitch to zero. Just figured out I need a T-25 screwhead set to align the barrel properly.
>>29970733
If you're experiencing problems, then remove the barrel and reinstall it. If you're not, don't bother. You'd need a torque wrench set to 62-inch pounds as well to correctly reinstall the barrel.
>>29970813
62 inch pounds is finger tight.
>>29940319
Between my dad and I we have a SCAR 16, SCAR 17, AR-15 and AR-10. I've shot all of them extensively. I vastly prefer the AR platform. There are some cool things about the SCAR (particularly the 17) but none that justify the enormous price differential between them and the ARs.
>>29965182
No it's not, haven't you seen other bullpups? If you want ridiculous just look at the fn-2000 or that croatian one with the adjustable stock (for god knows why because it's already excessively long).
It's average for a bullpup.
>>29970922
Four screws, finger tight is all it needs.
I installed a handguard extension on mind when I got it home from the ffl. So I don't know if I had that issue, but I have heard of it happening to others.
The solution is easy least to fix though.
>>29967230
>SR-25
Buyer's remorse; the rifle. At least if you buy a Colt or other standard rifle it's going to hold most of its value. With the SR-25 it's like buying a car and watching its value drop like a stone because KAC keeps bringing out another version with some letters tacked onto the end.
>>29940319
Well I just got outta delta and joined sadsog and I gotta say it's pretty shit desu
>>29940319
Well I was in delta and I'm in sadsog now I gotta say they are pretty useless.
>>29970922
>>29971523
62 in lbs is a lot more than finger tight.
![p_100014412_1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/uqprZPz.jpg "p_100014412_1[1].jpg")
>>29970813
http://www.brownells.com/gunsmith-tools-supplies/general-gunsmith-tools/wrenches/general-wrenches/precision-torque-limiter-kit-prod66585.aspx
I have my own torque wrenches, but the dedicated 62 inch lb kit from Borka was too slick not to have in my toolbox. The only problem is that the ratchet rusts if not oiled like it was in my toolbox.
>>29946464
Sorry about your lack of disposable income
>>29946473
Nah bruv, join the club. My club
>>29950335
Holy shit you just wrote the most retarded post I've read on k today. That's pretty impressive.
>>29946473
Some people just want to see the world burn.
I bet you drive faster than the speed limit too, you utter madman.
>>29967230
You don't know anything about any of the 4 platforms you commented on, so why don't you just stfu?
>>29940319
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=06036444051570723511
>Hey kid, wanna operate?
Lot of autism from SCAR haters in this thread. I have said it many times ... If I could only have one rifle for the rest of my life, it would definitely be a SCAR 17S with a high-quality variable power, illuminated scope, like the IOR 1-10x. Literally a do-everything rifle.
SCAR or FAL?
At some point in the future I'd like to buy one or the other.
>>29941052
>SRT operator
ahahahahahahahaa
leave, seriously.
>>29940319
I sure like the way they look. I'll buy one when I start pulling down that baller single 0-3 pay hopefully
>>29970922
>Over 5 foot pounds is "finger tight"
Don't touch me or my son's rifle ever again.
>>29940319
>2016
>Paying $2000+ for a rifle that isn't a bullpup.
>>29940579
>9 different shades of brown
okay yeah i'm jelly as shit but the colour matching is horrible
>>29973652
Have you used the IOR 1-10? it's at the top of the list for optics I'm considering for my SCAR, but I haven't found many people using it
>>29974870
It's a feature
>>29976320
No 1-10 is good today. At least not on high end. Too much tunneling.
The March 1-10 is better, and lighter.
I went with a 2.5-10x32 NF with an offset red dot
>>29974870
>Colour
Please go, you can't own this rifle anyhow.
>>29976773
Also explains the jelly
>>29950828This is what your life has become? Shitting your pants over the designation for a gun you don't even own? Jesus fucking Christ kill yourself.
>>29974870
>the colour matching is horrible
Show us your single color camouflage.
>>29980614
>>29952650
you're out of your fucking mind.
>>29959078
lol even my Steyr Aug barrel is made by FN.
You want cheap barrels? Look at your mass market ARs. Now these are CHEAP
>>29965186
Hi desert dog. Lots of bad reviews from that guy, send it to TROS or buy the CMMG barrel and do it yourself.
https://hi-desertdog.com/p90-hdd-fnh-typeflash-hider-muzzle-device.html
http://www.trosusa.com/PS90/ps90sbr.htm
https://www.cmmginc.com/shop/barrel-10-4-ps90-4150cmv-cl-19-5-7x28/
It's belgian, can't go wrong with that
>>29984102
TROS is good to go
