When are we going to bomb this and what weapons will we use?
Never.
>>29844521
Again, OH WOW A 76MM HOLY SHIT
>>29844336
Why would we bomb that?
>>29844521
Now that I thought about it: artificial island bases are james-bond tier niggery.
>>29844561
I kno rite
>>29844528
They better hope that anything more modern than a Sherman doesn't land there.
>>29844336
Would be better to capture it for ourselves
>>29844521
>fucking 76mm gun
>not a fucking S-300 system
dude.
guess which one is more effective
guess which one they have already fucking put on woody island
>>29844336
>When are we going to bomb this and what weapons will we use?
So, to answer your question fully:
1. A lot sooner than the Chinks might think, if they keep fucking pushing, and
2. AGM-88 HARMs and TALDs/MALDs to help suppress any AA/SAM sites, followed up by JSOWs to nail the SAMs and the tarmacs/parking areas. JSOWS with the BROACH warheads will be hitting the runways, taxiway and taxiway access points soon after.
The third wave will use bunker-busting bombs to target any remaining fortifications.
>>29844839
both?
>>29844851
Bingo. I'd worry about the HQ-9/S-300, not the plinkydink anti-ship guns.
Shit I doubt Woody has any 76mm guns anyway, that's mainly for those bases that are just a concrete blockhouse in the middle of the ocean.
>>29844846
Just drop an american without a parachute nearby. The resulting tsunami wave will completely sweep the island off the map.
>>29844986
kek
>>29844336
We'll dust off the XB-70 and drop cluster bombs on the runway at fuck-you speed.
Why would you bomb it when you can simply blockade it and watch them starve to death
This whole Chinese dickwaving could be over in a minute if USA built ballistic missiles. They're tiny sand dunes with tiny defenses. It's basically shooting fish in a barrel if USA had BM because China's anti ballistic missile tech is non existent.
>>29847492
>This whole Chinese dickwaving could be over in a minute if USA built ballistic missiles.
Had them since the 50s
>>29847510
I mean non nucleared ones. Nuking the Paracel Islands would be overkill. The radiation would prevent any Chinese from coming back like Bikini Atoll.
>>29847528
>I mean non nucleared ones
>nucleared
and no, launching ballistic missiles isn't a good idea.
>>29847492
China had ABM since the 70s.
Nowadays, they are deploying the HQ-19 as their THAAD equivalent.
>>29847528
>non-nuclear ballistic missiles
Why the fuck does everyone outside the US and Russia think this is a good idea?
>>29848196
Because the US and Russia are the only countries that realized launching something that looks like a nuke at another country could make someone think they are launching a nuke.
>>29844561
America did that before.
We are perfidious. And I'm proud to be an American.
>>29844846
>A lot sooner than the Chinks might think, if they keep fucking pushing, and
Jan 17th 2017?
It ain't happening before that.
>>29848152
>China had ABM since the 70s.
The Fanji was a prototype and never fielded. It doesn't count.
There's also no proof that the Chinese field enough HQ19 to withstand a ballistic missile saturation.
Like I said, this whole SCS tension only exists because of American negligence not because of Chinese military technology.
