Why having women in army is a good thing?
It's not.
>>29812336
Finally! Thank you!
Why would you want women in the army when there are millions of able bodied men to choose from
>>29812328
You know, I really dislike women who wear that much make up and feel the need to hide behind facebook tier photo filters. And sure enough they turn around and tell you not to just them on their appearance after they've worked so hard to promote that very thing.
Oh well. At least I have sex occasionally and have good friends; male and female, to keep me from losing my mind and shit posting on 4chan.
>>29812328
for snipers and light equipment maneuvers
>>29812328
Do we seriously need to have five of these retarded threads every day? We get it. You faggots don't want women in the military. We don't need to keep having this conversation.
>>29812328
I got pussy in Korea.
>>29812328
women are more flexible and some goy at the gym told me that that boxers and wrestlers need good flexibility. also as everyone knows from their wife or girlfriend they are much smarter than men. they are also better at emotional conflict resolution so you wont even need to fight as much and pow's will be much friendlier. they also have smaller bodies and everyone knows it only takes like 10lb's of pressure to to pull a trigger why waste time feeding oversized men when a woman can pull a trigger as easy as men. women are also far better at shooting than men because as my doctor said the Russian used to use them as snipers their small hands make them more accurate and better at hiding.
They're great for morale if they're halfway decent looking.
>>29812376
this
>>29812328
Women in the army is not a good idea. its not only not necessary considering the number of men available but women generally lack the physical capabilities of men. this would generally decrease the efficiency of the force in general. Also women are more valuable in reproductive terms than men. one man could impregnate one-hundred women, this cannot be said for one woman and one-hundred men.
>>29812398
Kek
This is really a stealth way to create pleasure units in the military. Those dicks aren't going to suck themselves. We should award bronze stars for fellatio.
>>29812429
More importantly think of the savings on medical when you only have to treat normal American STDs, as opposed to some third world tier shit that PFC Benis picked up.
Female girls in the army give great head. Also enjoyable playing with tax funded breast implants.
>>29812328
For non-combat stuff, sure (medics, FOB physician, general pog stuff, etc). Hell I don't mind having women as pilots.
For front-line duty, no.Just no.
>>29812328
Because it's 2016.
>>29812369
>for snipers
explain?
>>29812367
Sure you do nigger
>>29812525
WW2 soviet sniper chicks
>>29812598
Only because they were running out of men at the time.
>>29812328
Back to >>>/pol/
>>29812598
Snipers today do a totally different job than snipers in WW2.
Especially Soviet Snipers who were pretty much seen as expendable force multipliers.
>>29812328
>Q: Who is losing the debate regarding women in combat?
>A: The faggots who make threads about it every day.
>>29812599
Whatever the reason was, those women proved themselves as capable shipers. Let's not take that from them just because todays femenazis try to lower infantrymen standard to satisfy their whim.
>>29812620
We can argue the same about soviet (and to an extent, russian) snipers whose job is similar to DM in western military and doesn't operate independently from the infantry unit it attaches to
>>29812328
No reason why we should prevent qualified doctors and nurses from joining the military
>>29812367
Normie get out REEEEEEEEE
>>29812620
>Snipers today do a totally different job than snipers in WW2.
The sniper paradigm can still change. Give women a uniform, a scoped Savage Axis, and an FM 23-10, and creat a bunch of cheap expendable snipers, whose role isn't recon, just harassment.
>>29812714
notice how you are the only one who has mentioned anything about recon? this is bad thread anon, move along.
>>29812451
Ebin
>>29812328
pussy during deployments
>>29812990
>notice how you are the only one who has mentioned anything about recon? this is bad thread anon, move along.
I feel the cancer now.
Moving along.
>>29812328
I can't think of a reason
>>29812328
> army
Why would you EVER join the army?
L E L
>>29812328
The male soldiers need something to rape, and we can't have them raping each other, now can we?
>>29815303
they do anyway
>>29812328
It isn't. And because of it the US Army will loose the next war.
>>29812328
because than soldiers don't have to rape local women making wining hearts and minds easier
>>29812359
Because what point is there in wasting an able bodied man doing clerical work stateside?
>>29815638
The locals already do it, who would you want to provide them with more women?
Its not
>>29812328
It's not.
>>29812598
FYI they where worst than the men and only used because men where dead and they where blown up because of propaganda.
They where never good soldiers, it's why by 45 most of them where back in the factories.
>>29812328
So we can stop having less fucking faggots. I mean just look at the navy. Having women is better then jerkin it.
>>29817042
>Having women is better then jerkin it.
>Translation: I've never served a day
>>29817081
> faggot who wants to continue fucking or jerking it to his personnel.
This is exactly what I mean.
>>29812328
Because of no reason.
Physically speaking, men are generally superior to women in a combat scenario.
>>29815261
Honestly, I'd choose the Marines out of that four.
I just love getting stuck in and dirty. pic related
>>29817515
I hear you on that
>>29815261
The air force seems like it will give you the most options when you leave
You also get lots of pussy
>>29812525
Most women have pretty stable hands compared to men they'd probably be useful.
>>29812387
from a drinky girl. Drinky girls are Flip hookers for civfags.
>>29815323
this is a fact
>>29812328
makes it less boring when theres nothing to shoot
Cause i prefer the warm moist hole i stick my dick in, not be attached to a man or an animal.
>>29812328
We what to kill our enemys not make them sandwichs.
>>29812376
This has been done to death, the horse hasn't been kicked to death, its been kicked across the continental united states.
Its just trolling, there are always guarantee replies, because some people take it seriously. Its like this: they post this thread, and giggle to themselves look at this delicious bait. Gonna watch /K/ troll themselves or something, and if it shows signs of slowing down or being avoided, they throw in a post to try and fuel it. Tho at this point, it may as well be a normally accepted thing since its always talked about and responded to in mostly a serious matter. Infact, the responses can probably be copypasta from a bot to these threads.
If it were not from the constant influx of newfags, threads like this could be completely ignored.
>>29822750
See this, this is what I'm talking about.
>>29812605
>too braindead to debate
>hurr maybe if I link /pol/ they'll think I'm smart
Women have a place in the military. Just not the front line roles.
>>29822784
Why would you take any woman that literally can't be expected to be as good as a shitbag male? Even if its not the infantry they should have the same requirements as men, that's the definition of being equal, isn't it?
Or are women just not equal to men
>>29816669
Firstly, you're ingles sux. Go back to skool
Secondly, where's the fucking proof?
>>29823742
Why wasmt there a big push for more female soldiers in Russia after the war if they were anywhere close to as good as men?
>>29823701
You remind me of this muslim guy that started asking me questions in my uni library about why woman should be allowed to have jobs.
>>29823783
Did you have an answer besides, "b-but muh equality, women are just as capable as men when they are given special treatment for being women"
>>29823801
I quickly realised he was an immigrant going through some kind of culture class and told him to talk about those subjects with his teacher.
Honestly, if you can't see by yourself how a woman is useful for things besides staying at home all day, what hope do I have of showing you the light? Using the other 50% of our race to do things is what makes our countries more successful than the muslim ones. There's a lot of non infantry related roles that a woman can put in and perform adequately. I just see them as another body for another job.
>>29815261
that dude in the upper left is cozy as fuck
>>29812387
My grampa got deaf in Korea
>>29812328
You can fuck them.
That's it.
Everything else a guy will do better.
>>29815261
this should be the main strategy for the AF marketing department
>and the navy could do a similar one, but with a bunch of dudes
>>29823968
>implying women would just sit in offices or warehouses all day when deployed
>implying when war/conflict happens they don't get chosen for convoys or patrols because reasons
Just because you have a job in the military that shouldn't see combat or the suck doesn't you won't see combat.
Both the Army and the Marines have "combat training" after boot camp for non-infantry MOS's for that reason. Women aren't going to be stuck in CONUS when their unit deploys, their happy asses are going with their unit and if it is an actual war, they're going to see shit and will be ineffective when in combat.
Shit son, instead of insulting other anons for not having your opinion, educate yourself on how a units works and deploy. Also, women perform sub par even in non-combat roles like supply clerks and admin. Poor work ethic is ubiquitous among females in the military.
>>29824546
You can fuck men too.. And they cant get pregnant.
>>29812336
First post best post
>>29825874
No one knows how to touch a man like a man, or so they say...
>>29812336
/thread
>>29817515
>>29815261
That looks like it would suck
>>29812328
You double your workforce
>>29812328
Bumo
