Let's say for example a Burke is out on patrol by itself and all of a sudden the entire crew decide to mutiny and go off course. What would the USN do to get the ship back? Can anything even destroy a fully loaded Arleigh Burke?
Also, I've heard desertion is punished by death in the navy, how would that factor in?
>>29797924
A single torpedo from a Los Angeles would be enough to execute every deserter aboard.
The ship would be a total loss though. But we can build more.
Depends on how far they'll go
If the crew is good they'll hide the mutiny before anybody outside would realize and ask nations to shelter them
If they suck pretty sure they'll try to board her to retake the ship if not just blow her up
>>29797930
Arleigh Burkes have LAMPS helicopters and torpedo decoys
>>29797924
i cant think of any situation that would cause a full mutiny like that. but >>29797930
is right, as a tin can sailor, torpedoes are fucking terrifying
>>29797930
Come now, even if it broke the Burke's keel it would probably stay afloat long enough for most of the crew to abandon ship and get picked up for court martial
>>29797955
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wwn7l3cZzZM
nah
>>29797924
>Can anything even destroy a fully loaded Arleigh Burke?
>>29797953
isn't like, everything terrifying to you guys, even your own 5 inch guns?
everything i've heard is that most all USN modern surface ships are basically paper mache.
>>29797955
supercaviation is a hell of a drug, anon.
>>29797924
>Is the US Navy prepared for mutiny
Yes.
Why did you think they had such a large number of military police on board? The ethnic card is also played to safeguard against mutiny.
Fighter jets have remote control overrides in them which is why when we go to war Iran will take control of them and fly them to bomb a neutral country.
>>29799366
>>29797924
Depends what the Marines on board choose to do.
>>29799139
>Ethnic card
Explain
>>29799544
Sure. I got this explanation from a retired policeman with experience in this.
While all groups WORK together in the land of the ethnic melting pot it all comes to an end in the quarters. The the living quarters onboard the larger ships the enlisted men are segregated by ethnicity and the military police there are of the same ethnicity. Mixing does not work unless the plan is to kill off people. Tension is always high and if the officers are overthrown in a mutiny their effect as glue will end and the mutiny turns to inter ethnic battles. And from that you cannot work an effective mutiny and get anywhere.
>>29800223
what a load of shit
>>29800223
Unless if the Burke travels to China. America will not risk economic suicide for a boat
>>29800246
>>29800551
Have you ever served your country in uniform?
This one should be fairly well known and is the tip of the ice berg: http://www.amren.com/features/2015/03/race-riot-at-sea/
>>29797966
>significant portion of the ship goes airborne
Jesus.
>>29800674
>1972
First off the Lamps Helo is only effective if airborne and actively looking, most times it is not, second there are no marines on board DDG's and only one or two MA's. The ships response force is composed of sailors of all rates not dedicated MA's. Third torpedo decoys are really a placebo... They are really not effective, especially if you are not expecting and a ship can only stay at GQ for a limited time before fatigue sets it.
>>29800223
>While all groups WORK together in the land of the ethnic melting pot
~__~
Melting pot is of EUROPEAN ETHNICITIES only
But yes I'm sure the military is well aware that blacks are ticking timebombs and the other non-whites have foreign loyalties
>>29800674
I don't think things today are anything as bad as it was under kikes like Zumwalt and the progressive madness of the day
>>29800674
I did get a speech the other day about some punkasses how hard it was to be black when we all have to wear the same things, get the same quals, get paid the same and on the same days and work in the same spaces.
>>29801066
Well ofc its hard
they have 20 less IQ than whites
>>29800835
>>1972
Yeah, so just let us forget about it, right? Right?
>>29801023
>other non-whites have foreign loyalties
Still missing the point. It is not about *foreign* loyalties but loyalties to the group.
>I don't think things today are anything as bad
We can hope for it. The Navy is NOT going to take that chance. One US ship loaded with military technology going to Russian or Chinese port after mutiny will not be a happy day at the Pentagon.
>>29801542
>Yeah, so just let us forget about it, right? Right?
So we learned from it and adapted. Congressional inquiry much?
>>29801542
The point is, if the blacks started a riot aboard a carrier today, the Captain is not going to pussy foot around them like they did in WW2 or the 60's, because progressives don't run things anymore
>typical american thread.
>>29797924
Yeah, they would sink it.
Survivors that were part of the mutiny would be executed.
>>29802080
>Survivors that were part of the mutiny would be executed.
How do you even prove that
>>29802046
>waaah I don't have a navy!
>>29801962
>So we learned from it and adapted
That was my point from the very beginning.
>>29801992
>pussy foot around them like they did in WW2 or the 60's
Check the dates again, please. Still, I guess it would be part of the contingency plans to open fire on the rioters.
>>29802130
>How do you even prove that
You don't. You don't have to.
>>29801992
>progressives don't run things anymore
>>29803053
They don't, it's marxists that run things now
Obama sure as shit is not a progressive.
>>29797949
You'll need more than two choppers to pin down a Virginia-class, anon!
>>29797966
Not sure comparing an old (and relatively small) Leander with a Burke is an entirely fair comparison.
>>29803114
>it's marxists that run things now
And that's why every USN ship has a political officer.
>>29800674
Oh, it's this faggot again.
>>29797924
It's considered a rogue asset and would be destroyed. This of course wouldn't be done until after everyone on board who wished to leave was given the chance, and a naval siege was at least attempted to starve them out (of fuel too). Naval vessels have to dock and resupply sometime. Basically it wouldn't last long if it was an isolated incident, if they were supported by some faction though it could be viable.
If it were something like an aircraft carrier a nuclear weapon might be used. This is the primary reason we keep nukes around, they make quick work of any naval vessel which are devastating weapons. No one would be foolish enough to risk them on a civilian population, the reason we want to keep them out of our certain nations hands is because it nullifies our naval power should we choose to use it against them.
>>29800674
>http://www.amren.com/features/2015/03/race-riot-at-sea/
Jesus Christ, they should've just tossed all those fucks overboard.
>>29799366
>we decide to attack Iran
>they hack our jets and bomb Israel
>Israelis: "oh my yahweh the goyim have finally woken up and are retaliating!"
>they exercise the Samson Option
>all of Europe and the US destroyed
>Iran wins
Brilliant
>>29797924
>Can anything even destroy a fully loaded Arleigh Burke?
other fully loaded burkes you fucking retard?
>>29804628
Those were liberal times m8
The whole black lives matters shit is the modern day black civil rights movement, look at what it accomplishes vs what happened back in the 50s/60s/70s
The "Greatest Generation" fought a world war against everything right wing, then spent the rest of their lives imposing their left wing agenda on the country... now we get to reap the rewards of a 50% white America
>>29804845
They're not going to nuclear apocalypse us, just nuke the capitols/densely populated areas to spite us for not defending them. This is a CONFIRMED strategy of theirs...
You don't know what the Israelis have undeclared. These people are one of the dominant empires on the planet right now, you think they feel like they have to answer to us? They practically control us through subversion and infiltration.
>>29805087
>They practically control us through subversion and infiltration.
>>29805087
>just nuke the capitols/densely populated areas to spite us for not defending them.
How are they going to do that? What weapons do they have that have the range to do that?
>This is a CONFIRMED strategy of theirs...
By who?
>>29805373
>doesn't bother researching at all
>puts the burden of proof on others
Your tone makes it seem like you have a prior bias, you aren't going to take it from me. do some basic research yourself or remain wilfully ignorant.
>>29806227
>Your tone makes it seem like you have a prior bias, you aren't going to take it from me. do some basic research yourself or remain wilfully ignorant.
I do have a bias.
It's towards the facts.
You have none.
>>29805087
>>29805373
>>29806227
>>29806630
>/pol/ newfriend picks a fight with OPPen
>>29800674
Back to /pol/ with your white nationalist links.
>>29797924
>US loses control of a ship with munitions
subs would sink it in a heartbeat.
>Pull into singapore for liberty
>Everyone gets off the boat
>I undo the ropes and sail away to india
>Crash teh boat onto Pajites boat scrap yard
>Walk way with 1k rupies
>Live like a king the rest of my life in shit street india
>>29806227
oh please keep arguing with oppenheimer with nukes, please.
>>29806898
>Walk way with 1k rupies
>Live like a king the rest of my life
kek.
>>29800674
>beat a man nearly to death over a sandwich
typical nigger bullshit.
>>29804677
>They initiate the Samsung Option
>Satellites were hacked so GPS guidance of the missiles were wrong
>Missiles hit Antarctica
>Everybody gets Tsunami'd
>The Jews blame Japan
>>29804942
This is /k/, not /pol/.
>>29806770
I looked at some of the other stuff on that site. HOLY FUCKING SHIT.
>>29797924
First they'd probably try to talk them into surrendering by offering to not have them arrested and executed.
If that failed it would probably depend on what they were doing with the ship.
If they appeared to be making a run for Chink or Slav ports then i'd imagine they'd give them 1 warning that force will be used then sink them if they refuse to stop the ship.
If they appear to be making a run towards the US they would also be sunk because we can't have a rogue Burke opening fire on us.
If they just park it off the coast of Africa or South America or something maybe try to sneak SOF guys on board to retake the ship because that's a lot of money and would be nice to recover if they could. Also hard to imagine everyone in the crew would be willing to die trying to fight off SEALS/SFOD-D or whoever is running through the ship shooting people. If they can't figure out a way to do that then once again it gets sunk.
>>29797924
>Can anything even destroy a fully loaded Arleigh Burke?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing
>>29804451
How about the Burke's predecessor Spruance class getting rekt?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EunDiDKOLk8
>>29808970
>steal a destroyer
>park it in a port
>ignore the speed boat that approaches
yeah...
>>29797924
They only have a enough fuel for a couple weeks. Ships are only able to stay out at sea because they are replenished regularly. Just close off all the ports to them and starve them until they give up.
>>29797930
>The ship would be a total loss though. But we can build more.
>Cost: US$1.843 billion
>>29800223
You mean berthing is divided by department/division, based on the size of the department. And they don't have MAs in the berthing, unless there's suspicion of a crime. Except for females. They have their own spaces.
>>29809036
Why was the boat not fired upon?
Democrats in the White House?
>>29802130
>How do you even prove that
By the fact that they survived, clearly.
>>29797924
You really think a crew full of niggers, spics, and white trash would have the brainpower and desire to do something like that?
>>29809145
The "don't randomly fire on anything approaching us" rule
Would have been really handy when the US shot down a fucking airliner
>>29800674
>A disgruntled white sailor on Ranger, which was supposed to relieve Kitty Hawk, had deliberately thrown a steel rod into a main reduction gear, and the damage required a major overhaul
fucken lel
>>29806630
rekt
>>29806227
>telling Oppenheimer to do "basic research"
How's your first day on the internet going m9?
>>29809118
You think that's something? It's a bro :/ the hat called to the 600 billion dollar budget.
>>29806630
holy shit nigger rekt
>>29810847
*F-14 in disguise
>>29809145
The issue is not even the not firing on the boat, which obviously is a fuckup.
The #1 issue is that yemen was a hostile country, they pulled into a hostile port, what do they expect to happen other than being attacked
>>29806227
>MUH SAMPSON OPTION!
>telling Oppenheimer to do 'basic research'
I love seeing stormkikes get out of their cage and thinking they actually know anything
>>29812928
>SAMPSON
Hmm. With 200 thermonuclear devices they sure could assist in sinking any rogue ship and still delete all major cities in their neighborhood.
>>29810889
Yes, the conflict actually involved a lot of ships, not just the carrier.
>>29797924
>uncle served aboard a variety of ships in the seventh fleet during vietnam
>adjutant to an admiral
>aboard aircraft carriers
>mostly boring life at sea leads to plenty of conversations with all manner of crew
>local unconfirmed hub-bub on the grapevine:
>every aircraft carrier was secretly followed by a nuclear attack submarine
>often visible to sonar according to sonar operators
>never responds to hails according to bridge crew
>higher confirms it is not hostile according to admiral
>never seen above water but sometimes sorta visible as a shadow in the depths when traveling through shallow straits
>rumored to be present due to fear of someone capturing the aircraft carrier and its nuclear materials
>just in case
>believed to be under orders to destroy aircraft carrier in event of mutiny or capture
So: no successful mutiny for any vessel in an aircraft carrier group, anons.
>>29816268
But what if the nuclear sub mutinied? Is there a vast conga line leading back to port?
>>29816311
hidden remote detonators placed around the sub's reactor that can only be activated by the President.
Okay not really.
>>29816311
always.
>>29816311
Obviously. They watched Red October.
