[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
All american planes are pretty much stolen from 75 year old German
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 3
File: 1451861912288.jpg (266 KB, 1024x711) Image search: [Google]
1451861912288.jpg
266 KB, 1024x711
All american planes are pretty much stolen from 75 year old German technology. The Americans pinched almost everything they know about planes and rockets from the Nazis, and the Russians just copied their copies. Kinda pathetic, really.

>Durrr all tech evolved from the last

Wright Brothers contributed, they werent pillaged for their designs and human capital like germany
>>
File: 1440445710427.gif (135 KB, 500x300) Image search: [Google]
1440445710427.gif
135 KB, 500x300
>>29711294
nice thread m8
>>
>>29711294
Eat a dick nigger. Take your shitposting troll thread somewhere else.
>>
>>29711294
bullshit, for starters the germans werent further advanced in actual aircraft than the british at the end of the war, rockets perhaps but jets and prop engines were no significantly advanced over the british.

and while some german research was used in the american aviation industry, and subsequently improved upon by the americans and the british, many aspects of post war design rely on avionics and electronics, fields the germans lagged behind in in WW2, Area rule was something the americans figured out for themselves, and fly by wire and intentionally relaxed stability are ideas that the germans of 1945 simply couldnt have conceived.

all tech evolves from what went before it, and the germans didnt contribute anything that the allies werent well on their way to understanding on their own
>>
>>29711587
the germans were the ones fielding radar mounted aircraft left and right
>>
>>29711294
>eurotrash
>on /k/
>>
>>29711587
>fly-by-wire
>ww2

grasping
>>
File: n8umjWj.png (3 KB, 698x1284) Image search: [Google]
n8umjWj.png
3 KB, 698x1284
>>29711587
British jet engines were actually far superior. The main reason Gloster Meteors were not allowed over occupied territory was because of how far ahead of other nations we were at building engines, the airframe itself was a fairly conservative one.

Also OP, you're a retard.
>>
>>29711618

After the British invented radar, they began putting it on planes in the mid 30's, later to deploy it fully in 1939. The Germans didn't have their first airborne radar until the end of 1942.
>>
>>29711654
British had the best weapons. Best tanks too, not to mention the sexiest designs that look good even by today's standards.

They are truly not given enough credit
>>
>>29711294
Goddard had more to do with rocketry than Von Braun ever hoped for, he even said as much
>>
>>29711752
>British had the best weapons.
The Garand, B-17, P-51, and B-29 were all objectively superior to the Lee-Autismfield, Spitfire, and Brit bombers. Then of course there's Fat Man and Little Boy.
>>
>>29711770
>Goddard
>implying euros would ever acknowledge his existence
>>
>>29711798
Whoah whoah whoah.

First off, the P-51 kicked ass, but it was with British help. Secondly, the P-51 and Spitfire are completely different aircraft designs.
The Spitfire was a dogfighter and high maneuver frame, while the P-51 was a high altitude boom and zoomer. Both designs had flaws and advantages over the other, neither is even close to objectively superior beyond the fact the P-51 turned sharper at high speeds and the Spitfire turned faster at low speeds.
>>
>>29711618
Couldn't even into magnetron, those long night flights were sustained with cold hot pockets.
>>
>>29711798

>b17
>superior to the lancaster

it had a tiny bombload and precision bombing was largely a meme

its survivability didn't make up for being less effective as a bomb truck
>>
>>29711618
the germans were the ones facing major airborne raids nightly, the allies had radar equipped nightfighters earlier than the germans had had better radar throughout, they had less multiplication of different sets and less variations of plane largely because R&D and manufacturing werent such a retarded clusterfuck, and much of the german proliferation of radars was driven by the RAFs rapidly growing ability to counter earlier radars.

>>29711798
>The Garand, B-17, P-51, and B-29 were all objectively superior to the Lee-Autismfield, Spitfire, and Brit bombers. Then of course there's Fat Man and Little Boy.

Garand and B29 ok, although at the same time as the B29 is starting bombing the british are designing jet bombers and more or less skipping high altiude prop bombers.

the lancaster on the other hand could bomb as far and accurately by night as the B17 by day and carried a far heavier and more effective bombload doing it, they were also the bomber of choice for hitting high value point targets like the V3, sub pens and vital bridges or tunnels.

similarly the spitfire is a interceptor, the mustang is a long range escort, the spit was fully capable of besting the mustang within its range, the mustang could fly further, and the hawker tempest could kill both and was arguably the best prop fighter of the war in terms of performance.

the atomic bombs were developed with significant british involvement, specifically most of the early research being british
Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 3

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.