Ticks vs Ants which would win if they where both weaponized?
>>29569476
Ants. Easily.
Go away antman.
Ticks because they carry diseases. Ants are just painful/annoying, not dangerous.
>>29569476
I had a cum sock I was using for a few months that got all crusty and hard, then ants started eating it.
Does this mean I'm their leader?
>>29569560
The combined weight of ants on earth is roughly equal to the combined weight of humans on earth. Let that sink in for a moment. They'd just roll over you like a wave.
>>29569621
My weight in ants would still drown in ankle high water
Ticks as a bioweapon vector, ants for actual combat. African Driver ants are fucking terrifying, man.
>>29569476
>Implying Lyme's disease isn't a bio-weapon that was accidentally/intentionally leaked into the native tick population. You west coast/ rocky mountain fags are lucky you don't have to worry about this shit.
>>29569476
fact: there are more ants both in number, and overall biomass on this earth, than there are humans.
>>29569626
Are you sure? They might join together like in a japanese robot movie and become a floating ant raft.
Equally relevant,
Mountain dew or coke, who would win if they were both aeroplanes?
>>29570017
I want to stick my hand in it
>>29570017
I must stick my dick in it.
>>29570830
It would be extremely painful
Ants would beat Ticks if they were fighting each other, but Ticks would be more effective as a weapon against humans.
Unless you had a shitload of ants, but that would be a logistics nightmare.
>>29569476
we would scientifically fuse the tick and ants to make an anttick, and then cypernetically enhance them to create the ultimate weapon.
>>29569476
which one can you currently smash into oblivion between your fingers?
it's not ticks.
now make a tick the size of a basketball and have it genetically engineered to biochemically explode and splash diseased acid all over things
you now have an indestructible antipersonnel mine that can jump a skyscraper
>>29571055
Square cube law you fucking dipshit
>>29569476
Ants lad.
>>29570944
For you
>>29571635
>square cube law
Of course cubes are square. We don't have triangle cubes.
>>29572822
>He's a big guy
>>29569626
Ants are hydrophobic
>>29572915
What if I put them in a vat of oil? Do they still float?
