alright /k/. lets say hypodermically speaking, there was a belt fed 50cal sniper rifle with an Echo Trigger.
would you dump your wallet on the bullets?
>>29441678
>hypodermically
What you're hypothetically describing is an M2.
>>29441713
>spade trigger group
You dummy
>>29441678
>Hypodermically
Holy shit help, I'm dying
>>29441713
yeah but hear me out. instead of an M2 and its conventional reciprocating system, you use the same oold DI thingamabob in an ar-15 ok? you take a super big bolt, buffa tube, all that jazz for 50BMG, BUT, the rounds aren't fed by a magazine. they go through a belt. now you might be wondering "but anon, how would the bolt seal the chamber with a belt strip in the way?". that's where nevebeendunbefo armory comes in. the belt is strapped riiight at the end of the casing, and the bolt is specially tooled to seal with both the casing and the belt tooth with a flange. perfectly sealed, with your echo trigger, you essentially have a god machine.
whaddayathink?
>>29441733
>rapid belt-fed 50cal fire.
Putting an Echo Trigger on something like a Barrett explicitly for spamming 50cal rounds is just a convoluted way to do exactly what an M2 does.
>>29441678
>hypodermically
>>29441761
I think lower-middle class bait has beendunbefo.
>>29441762
how is it convoluted if it's cheaper and more readily available? that's the opposite of convoluted. that's provoluted.
>>29441791
but upper-class reciever though. yeah?
I predict a thread full of memes
M2>whatever the fuck
I, for one, am all up for injecting a belt fed 50cal sniper rifle with an Echo Trigger under my epidermis.
>>29441812
M2s are heavy and old. they're from a time when guns were made with the intent to kill not to boast on the internet.
