what is the world's most dangerous criminal organization?
Russian mob? Yakuza? Cartels? Isis? African american gangs?
>>29338039
The US Government.
>>29338039
>organization
>dindu gangs
Pick one.
AIPAC
>>29338039
CIA, SVR, FSB
Probably the Mexican cartels:
One of the cartels near Mazatlan was literally founded by members of a Mexican SOF team....
... Turns out they decided that v there was more money in drugs.
>>29338146
But true.
>>29338065
/THREAD
not even joking
>>29338065
There isn't even any contest.
>>29338039
NAMBLA
>>29338039
The FED and IMF are prolly the top two.
Bilderberg group is prolly right up there as well.
>>29338512
>>conspirators
>>29338351
^this
Marlon Brando is the fucking Godfather
Captcha was "school buses"
>>29338512
>>29338566
And yes I work for IMF. Ask me anything
Friends of Soros
>>29338229
>Mexican SOF
Probably the equivalent of army reservists starting a gang.
>>29338039
Wabakazishe Gang
or the 13th Street Gang
or the Athenian Mafia
>>29338985
You do realize they have tier one SF, right?
>>29338039
There's probably something in Russia you don't want to fuck with.
>>29338065
>>29338152
>>29338339
>>29338350
Notevenbismuth.jpg
How do you define "dangerous"?
>>29340250
>You do realize they have tier one SF
You do realize "tier one" just means a special mission unit, right? As a label it is completely meaningless beyond describing organization, it does not correlate with quality.
There could be a Mexican Special Mission Unit whose mission is to secure all the fucking taquerias so that terrorists can't steal all the gorditas, and their TOE could a dirty pick up truck, .22 revolver that sometimes falls apart, and some boat oars.
But they're an SMU, and thus "tier one".
>>29340533
Isn't the tier by budget and missions?
>>29338039
Organized crime is largely decentralized. It's a form of business organization. Their "danger" is dependent on the individual boss's temperament, methods, and business ends. They're only dangerous to the degree that they consider you a threat to their money and stability.
>>29340573
>Isn't the tier by budget and missions?
It has to do with how important that asset is to the mission of the command.
For JSOC, for example, ACE/CAG, DEVGRU, ISA etc. are "tier 1", while 75RR and 160SOAR are "tier 2".
It's not a ranking system for how bad ass a SMU is.
Saying a Mexican unit is "tier 1" is meaningless, especially if the mission of the specific Mexican COCOM is to defend taco trucks/stands, and their overall budget is Mexican "tier". For them, the unit I described would be "tier 1", and Miguel's cousin who is "good with cars" is "tier 2" because he supports the Mexican Taco Operations Command.
>>29338512
This.
There are some spooky groups out there and rich folks who give no fucks have historically had plenty of secret societies to enact their crime.
And that doesn't even take into account like the millions of different conspiracy theories about millions of organizations real or rumored, each acting like some secret deep state or rogue nation of a few.
>>29340674
Ah okay. That makes sense. Thanks komrade.
>>29338985
trained by our SF to battle the drug cartels. they decided they can do it better.
>>29340674
except they are constantly hunting cartel leaders and fighting wars on their own homeground and getting training from western SF, I highly doubt they are anywhere near as incompetent as you want to paint them, so unless you're experienced working alongside them, your ability to judge them seems kinda shit
>>29340750
My point was that saying they are "tier 1" is completely meaningless when you're talking capability, because "tier 1" just means they are the most important components of their command.
The GAFE are "tier 1" in the sense that they are the most important component of their command to their mission, just as the hypothetical Taco Defense Special Mission Unit in my example would be "tier 1" within the organization of the Mexico Taco Operations Command.
>>29340796
Here's an even better example, Unit 777 would be "tier 1" within their command.
It makes "tier 1" a meaningless term outside of a very specific context, doesn't it?
>>29338039
CIA
>>29338039
In terms of non-state actors, the answer is most definitely Mexican cartels. They have a reach that extends from the Americas to Africa, Asia and Europe. They have financial resources that put many governments to shame, and are on par with the largest multinational corporations. They can field relatively large private armies in the areas they control, and they control assassins and underworld figures that cross many national and ethnic boundaries.
>>29338065
>>29338039
Cia,Nsa, FBI in that order.
>>29338985
I believe they were trained by both army special forces and spent time in israel with mossad.
>>29338039
depends
nig street gangs are probably most dangerous to their immediate surroundings because they're randomly violent and fuck people up just because they're walking down the same street
slavshit mob and cartels on the other hand would be scary as fuck if you gave them a reason to take interest in you
>>29340507
as in largest threat, they're criminals so which group causes the most shit and can back it
>>29338039
As far as being dropped down into their territory, I'd have to say ISIS.
But the Mexican cartels scare me the most overall. Those fucks are ruthless.
>>29341274
For cartels is like nothing personal kid, just serious bizz and you're on the wrong side.
>>29338039
Kopassus
>>29340796
Except that's wrong:
There is a generally accepted definition of "tier 1", meaning a rigorous selection, extensive training, and mission capabilities in a similar vein to SAS, DEVGRU, GIGN, JTF2, etc.
You're obfuscating the point.
