[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
There is LITERAL - FUCKING - LEE no reason for future small arms
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 3
File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (167 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault (1).jpg
167 KB, 1920x1080
There is LITERAL - FUCKING - LEE no reason for future small arms to not be mainly integrated with a HUD for aiming and MAYBE iron sights as integrated backup.

It's safer, quicker, and would require less training and active accuracy.
>>
>>29286879

There is literally No-Fucking-Way the future of internal combustion vehicles will be fossil fuels based.

> Duh.
>>
>>29286879
>Increase in cost
>Increase in potential failure points
>Need to familiarize soldiers with software
>TFW hajiis shooting at you but gunsights.exe is not responding
>>
>>29286914
What makes you think that failure points will increase? Electronics dont have as many moving parts and iron sights have plenty of limitations the HUD would fix.

>>Need to familiarize soldiers with software

What the fuck are you talking about? In order to give it to grunts it'd be extremely simple to use like iPhones are. It's called human factor development

>>TFW hajiis shooting at you but gunsights.exe is not responding

We wont be fighting them forever
>>
>relying on batteries in battle
>relying on grunts to properly maintain them
>relying on grunts not to break shit all the time
>relying on units to fix broken shit with any conceivable form of expedience
>relying on the military to not pay quintuple top dollar for China tier half baked untested totally-not-a-congressman-helping-a-butt-buddy-line-his-pockets equipment
>>
>>29286940
Red dot sights rely on batteries or half-life of materials to function too.

>>relying on grunts to properly maintain them

They are electronics, not mechanical parts
>>
>>29286940

Autistic-level shitpost.
>>
>>29286879
>using the word "literally" as hyperbole
What kind of faggots is our education producing?
>>
>>29286952
Yeah, it's a AA powering a fucking LED, or a substance that literally makes its own light for years automatically.
>they are electronics
Even worse, at least even a tard can look at a set of levers and gears and have an idea how it works.

>>29286961
Nice samefag
>>
>>29286976
Actually, litterally litterally means figuratively now.

Look it up
>>
>>29286990
>a set of levers and gears and have an idea how it works

Wrong. Electronics are more intuitive than mechanical things

You put most people in a train control or airplane and they'll have no clue wtf is happening
>>
>>29286879
Isnt iron sights already a heads up display?
>>
File: Sweet, Delicious Democracy!.jpg (31 KB, 480x480) Image search: [Google]
Sweet, Delicious Democracy!.jpg
31 KB, 480x480
>>29286879
I imagine you're the kind of idiot who thinks that we will start fielding drone soldiers too. Let's go down a list of why it won't EVER happen.

>expensive.
You'd have to buy hundred of thousands of these units. At the cheapest they'd essentially be rifle mounted cameras with an aiming reticle. At best they'd be smart computers mounted to a soldier's uniform. Very expensive either way.

>easier to fail, no backup.
If the external aiming system/accuracy hud gets broken then you're firing blind. Irons aren't very capable past close-medium range for the average soldier.

>batteries.
They'd require large battery packs to be carried by soldiers. Forget to charge it and you're fucked. Runs out in the field and you're screwed. Red dots require very small batteries that last a LONG time and are far more cost effective. ACOG's and some other sites don't even need batteries to operate.

>Training.
Let's say you give an idiot this system. He doesn't shoulder his rifle and his shots are fucked. He can't hold the rifle well, fired full retard, and after 3 mags all he did was kill a local goat-light. Training someone to properly fire their rifle is much better, and has less chance of failure.

>MUHREENS.
They'll break it. They just will. or they won't get one for 20 years. Meaning they'll be using sharpies and raybans to compensate. (introducing ray ban aviator eliminators! starting price 3K$)

>Safety.
Fuck no it isn't safer. Who would you trust more with a gun? Boot with NO training and your system, or boot with great training and an Acog?

>stupid.
You're the kind of person who I imagine thinks that buying armored exoskeletons for an entire military is cost effective, and better than using what we have or developing better stuff.

You want a better dumb idea? Pavlov the entire Marine Corps to where upon hearing "Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition" they kill anything that isn't a red blooded patriot withing a 50 mile radius.
>>
File: c825af2f9233_sf_1.jpg (15 KB, 322x240) Image search: [Google]
c825af2f9233_sf_1.jpg
15 KB, 322x240
>>29286879
>tfw the coordinates are off, your HUD won't lock on, but you are ordered to fire
>>
>>29287127
This guy gets it
>>
>>29286879
We actually have HUDs in the military.


They fucking suck, which is why we use sights.

That and you can't shoot as consistently as quickly without a cheekweld, so what's the point?
>>
>>29286940
>this


Leave 3 solid steel balls in a locked, padded, windowless room with an Infantryman for a week.


By the end he'll have fucked one, lost one, and broke the last.
>>
>>29286879
expensive and unreliable
>>
Halo is a video game, and not an accurate reflection of potential military technology and strategy.
>>>/v/
Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 3

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.