[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
F-35 radar system has bug that requires hard reboot in flight
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 6
File: F-35-JSF-Pentagon-Report.jpg (53 KB, 448x270) Image search: [Google]
F-35-JSF-Pentagon-Report.jpg
53 KB, 448x270
Virtual BSOD for radar software could delay USAF's full deployment of fighter.
>In an episode of CBS' techno-procedural series CSI:Cyber that aired in January, pilots were forced to power off and power back on an airliner's flight computer to regain control from a hacker. As preposterous as that cold-boot of avionics sounds, it's something that test pilots have had to do with the F-35A "Lightning II" Joint Strike Fighter's radar system—not because of a hack but because of a software problem that causes the radar to degrade or stop working entirely.

>IHS Jane's reports that an issue arose in late 2015 with the F-35's AN/APG-81 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar system, built by Northrop Grumman for the Lockheed Martin-led F-35 program. The software planned to be used in the F-35A when the Air Force declares its "initial operational capability" (IOC) with the fighter later this year—revision 3i—has a major flaw. As Air Force F-35 Integration Office Director Major General Jeffrey Harrigian told Jane's, that flaw affects "radar stability—the radar's ability to stay up and running. What would happen is they'd get a signal that says either a radar degrade or a radar fail—something that would force us to restart the radar."
http://arstechnica.co.uk/information-technology/2016/03/f-35-radar-system-has-bug-that-requires-hard-reboot-in-flight/

FAIL
A
I
L
>>
Hey man good job posting this thread again. once wasn't enough

At least 6 more times would be good
>>
File: 1440111749216.png (288 KB, 1236x888) Image search: [Google]
1440111749216.png
288 KB, 1236x888
>>29228338
>>
>>29228338
>>In an episode of CBS' techno-procedural series CSI:Cyber
stopped reading there
>>
File: 1457651951354.jpg (131 KB, 1284x414) Image search: [Google]
1457651951354.jpg
131 KB, 1284x414
>>29228338

>A patch is expected by the end of March.

Wow it is fucking nothing
>>
>>29228353
>once

Please anon, we've had this thread at least half a dozen times now
>>
>>29228399
I was blessed enough in missing them
>>
File: sixth thread.jpg (107 KB, 410x410) Image search: [Google]
sixth thread.jpg
107 KB, 410x410
>>29228353
>>29228359
>>29228399
>>
>>29228353
Pointless threads are rather persistent, anon.
>>
>>29228338
Who would have ever guessed that software development wasn't easy?
>>
>>29228338
The F-15 has a similar bug. So does the Apache.
>>
File: 1455137325644.jpg (58 KB, 770x430) Image search: [Google]
1455137325644.jpg
58 KB, 770x430
It's a bit odd that a bug that first came into light over a year ago (granted it only got this bad with the 3i hardware) and which is likely going to get fixed really soon is made a huge headline out off now. The plane has far worse and way harder to fix issues than this
>>
>>29228338
Mods. I would like to suggest a 6 month moratorium on F-35 threads so that such faggots like the OP move on to the spacebattles forum. Please consider banning on sight. Thank you.
>>
File: lockheeb.jpg (37 KB, 260x476) Image search: [Google]
lockheeb.jpg
37 KB, 260x476
>>29228338

I wonder who will profit from delays...
>>
>>29228338
This is only surprising to people who think the AF only consists of pilots and that planes magically work all the time.

All platforms regularly have electronics issues. That's just the way life works. They all eventually get resolved, and replaced by new emerging issues.
>>
How about this problem?

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/air-space/2016/03/10/f-35-logistics-system-may-not-ready-air-force-ioc-target/81605826/
>>
>>29230124
Lockheed actually stands to lose money; they get bonuses if they meet objective timelines and penalised if they exceed threshold timelines.
Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.