How common were homosexuality relationshiPs between gis in www?
As in "the thin red line
>>28658828
Stigma was huge. It was a immense taboo and generally if you were thought to be a queer, you became more of an issue then you were worth. "Relationships" were immensely risky and I seriously would seriously doubt any claims of relationships forming between GIs.
>>28658828
>>28658910
Homosexual acts were shockingly common. Some units had up to 71% of soldiers engaging in anal sex. Up to 50% of our grandpas blew a dude.
It was more common for soldiers to have sex with each other than to see the enemy.
War is hell.
>>28658828
Incredibly common. Like more than half of GIs.
>>28659015
>War is hell.
Gay as hell you mean.
>>28658828
Who was gay in the thin red line? I dont remember anyone
among japs 100% among gis liek 0.1% desu family USA USA
I've heard that spit roasts/DP happened all the time in front line units.
>>28659038
historically speaking, likely most of them
>>28659015
We're talking about the American army, not the Russian army
>>28659084
Indeed we are.
"relationships" are easier in the Legion. I'm sorry.
look, at least we have women serving!
>>28658828
>gay relationships in WW era armies
No
>random butt sex in WW era armies
Yes
>>28658828
Between yurocuck armies? 110%
American armies? -12%
Imagine two rugged GI's decked out in full combat gear vigorously throating each others' cocks in a 69.
Then afterwards, washing down semen with a swig of iodine tab water from their aluminum canteens.
>unbuttons woolen trousers
>>28659108
Whats the story behind this pic?
related
(censored for retarded blue board)
This is now a WWII homoerotica thread.
>>28658828
The military is extremely homoerotic. I know a few marines. Gayest dudes I've ever met. Fun guys though, and they aren't the kind of gay that prances around and wears heals or shouts about marriage (unless they are ranting about the White House being lit up like a fag flag), but still... Gayest guys ever. Seeing as we all know about the Greeks taking it up the pooper 1000s of years ago, I think it's pretty safe to say it's always been that way.
Now I'm no woman, and I'm no military man, but it seems to me that the military environment allows men the same sexual freedoms as the regular world allows women. Ability to experiment in rare cases, and most of the time just flirt with or teaser the same sex without so much retaliation.
So not that they're all prancing, dick-sucking fairies, but they certainly lack the boundaries of masculinity that are imposed upon the modern man.
They probably slapped each other's asses all the time and saw each other naked. Did they jerk each other off? Probably more often then the guys back home, but that doesn't mean that every single night in the field was like Brokeback Mountain.
Or maybe they really were just a bunch of fudge-packing queers. I don't fucking know.
>>28659453
Just Finland after dark.
>>28659496
Nothing more gay than a straight Marine.
>>28658828
I'd say the service is no gayer than being on the football team. When its freezing balls in the field its definitely not gay to scoot your sleeping bags together and essentially spoon.
Everyone comfortable with their sexuality and you're pretty damn bro tier with all the shit you go through.
>>28659015
Source or bullshit.
I think I remember my grandpa saying that he had a CO in the army air corps shoot a gay guy for being really fucking gay once. He had alzhimers so maybe he got confused and meant to say the CO shot a black guy for being really fucking black, but I don't doubt either case.
Where is your god now?
>>28659497
>we all know about the Greeks taking it up the pooper 1000s of years ago
What you know, like a lot of leftist deconstructionist horseshit, is wrong.
The relationship between an erastes and an eromenos was more like a patronship. It involved an older guy and a 'beardless youth', meaning someone of consenting age. There were no dating opportunities since the wimminz were segregated, so if you have somebody whose thighs you can grease up and stick your dick between and mimic conventional sex with, that's a fringe bennie. Anal sex was looked upon as unsanitary and disgusting, and so were same sex relationships between guys of the same age.
The horseplay and mock-sexual displays that occurs in all-male groups is obviously something you're too much of a sheltered little metrosexual creature to understand. You might as well posit that half the NFL are queer because they're patting each other on the ass or throwing arms around each others' shoulders.
The percentage of cocksuckers in WW2 -- with a healthy culture where masculinity was prized and everybody went to church on Sunday, if only as a social ritual -- was probably a lot lower than in the general population today.
Nothing follows.
I've heard several stories but I have not witnessed anything. There was a kid in basic training named Simmons that definitely fit the profile. A bunch of MPs got sent home for fucking locals my second tour.
>>28659015
>Some units had up to 71% of soldiers engaging in anal sex
Settle down Mr. Tarantino
>>28659588
"And if there were only some way of contriving that a state or an army should be made up of lovers and their beloved, they would be the very best governors of their own city, abstaining from all dishonour, and emulating one another in honour; and when fighting at each other's side, although a mere handful, they would overcome the world. For what lover would not choose rather to be seen by all mankind than by his beloved, either when abandoning his post or throwing away his arms? He would be ready to die a thousand deaths rather than endure this. Or who would desert his beloved or fail him in the hour of danger?"
—Plato, Symposium. 4th century BCE
Nah, dude. Greek buttsex is real. You should read sources from that time period. Buttsex everywhere.
>>28659665
don't try arguing with this tripfag. This guy has a legit mental instability about this kinda stuff. I'm 90% sure he was touched as a kid, considering how passionate about the subject he gets.
>>28659665
>>28659710
>responding to angry tripfags
>>28659453
Unspesified gear evening head count
>>28659722
I don't want Phil staying in the closet. It's not healthy. He has to face it.
>>28659665
It was normal as females didn't exist back then. Homoerotic sex was as normal as Heterosexual sex as both were one and the same.
>>28659711
I think it's pretty important to be presented with a narrative that doesn't equate masculinity and make relationships with homosexuality
>>28659776
Taking up the Sexually-secure Man's Burden, I see? Well, best of luck to you. It's a noble cause to labor for such a thing even though you will get no reward or recognition.
>>28659497
Honestly, this was a damn good analysis. My hat is off to you man.
>>28659588
>What you know, like a lot of leftist deconstructionist horseshit, is wrong.
Shouldn't you be in /pol/ ?
>>28659754
>remember boot squadmates squabble about what we were supposed to wear at role call
>more than one suggested since it didn't say 'xxx uniform' that we go in underwear and that it was a test
yeah work that tool...
>>28658828
While in the US army there was some pretty gay shit going on in the barracks and the platoon itself but I never saw any kind of homosexual relationships going on.
>>28659588
>church on Sunday
fuck off Phil
>abwabwbaea angryfaggot right on time lol im not even mad!
>>28659970
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LksYTLJpVE
SIX
HOT
LOADS
>>28659789
>It was normal as females didn't exist back then
>worked at "adult bookstore" while in college
>so many gay grandpas
>completely fucked my view of old people
>>28660183
now thats what I'm talking about.
>>28659038
Read the book
>>28659808
phil pls
