[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Desert Tech MDR
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 55
Thread images: 15
File: image.jpg (87 KB, 674x450) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
87 KB, 674x450
>Good weight
>.308 convertible
>Reputable manufacturer
>Not shit bullpup trigger

Red pill me on the MDR /k/. Why shouldn't I get one to be my general purpose rifle?
>>
the price.
If it were $500 less, maybe.
>>
It looks even uglier than the Tavor
>>
Because it's vapor.
>>
File: vapor.jpg (108 KB, 1280x750) Image search: [Google]
vapor.jpg
108 KB, 1280x750
Can I buy it yet? No? Well that's why
>>
>>28628894
you can actually start buying from their website and look forward to delivery in Q2 2016
>>
>>28628900

>Q2 2016
>Now

You get to pick one.
>>
>>28628908
>moving goal posts

you can buy one m8
it's not my fault you're too poor to be able to afford one and have the attention span of a drunk toddler and can't wait literally 2 months.
>>
Kel-Tec RDB might be better.

It's more expensive than it should be.

It's ugly.

That's all I got.
>>
>>28628929

See, that's the problem. How do we know Desert Tech won't just mirror Kel-Tec with respect to their production numbers? Even if they start shipping in Q2 2016, who knows when you'll actually get one. OP's question was, and I quote ''why shouldn't I get one.'' Because, you can give Desert Tech your money now, but you still can't physically procure one because they're not released yet.
>>
>>28628947
desert tech just upgraded their production capabilities specifically to meet expected demand for the MDR.
>>
>>28628941
>Kel-Tec RDB might be better.
It isnt, they've openly stated the RDB is meant to be a cheaper, easier to produce and not as nice version of the RFB.

Sauce: Hank Strange video with the RDB and Andrew or Chad from KT

>>28628947
>See, that's the problem. How do we know Desert Tech won't just mirror Kel-Tec with respect to their production numbers?
My RFB's serial is in the 200s, they could always be had on gunbroker.
>>
What's the price on it?

They've arguable created the perfect platform, assuming it ends up reliable and accurate. Better snatch them up quick, I can see demand being pretty high initially. For the past 2-3 years no one has shut up about it, and for the past 2-3 years its been coming out "next year".
>>
File: PVXE5_wKzhw.jpg (456 KB, 1280x853) Image search: [Google]
PVXE5_wKzhw.jpg
456 KB, 1280x853
>>28628868
let post a superior forward ejection gun
>>
>>28629399
What the hunk is that fuck of shit?
>>
>>28628868
The safety looks kind of undersized
>>
>>28628868
aside from the .308 option, I dont understand why I should buy this over the new Tavor
>>
>>28629445
>doesn't shoot brass in your mouth
>not jewish
>>
>>28629449
aside from being a shit-blood lefty, thats not a problem
>>
File: 123.jpg (631 KB, 1280x853) Image search: [Google]
123.jpg
631 KB, 1280x853
>>28629399
>dat height over the bore
>dat gases into eyes
>>
>>28628868

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. If you already have a rifle though and you really want a bullpup, it's probably worth waiting to see how they turn out. Might turn out nice.

As for giving them money now and hoping for a good product later... Go ask /v/ how pre-ordering worked out for them.
>>
File: 1360862215[2].jpg (25 KB, 750x318) Image search: [Google]
1360862215[2].jpg
25 KB, 750x318
Real men aren't lefties and know how to properly deflect casings when they need to.
>>
>>28628977
>Always had on Gunbroker
Yeah, for 8000X MSRP. What a deal.
>>
>>28628883

Its a bullpup penis.

It looks like a fucking penis.
>>
>>28628953
Nigga they probably literally a few hundred of their weird bolt actions a month, that's meaningless

>>28629916
Does your dick have quad rails?
>>
>>28629721

>untested design with no laurels
>made by Mormons
>been vapour for years
>looks like a fucking penis

Maybe itll be good.
I wouldnt buy for a couple years til its been reviewed and tested and shot 30-40k rounds.

Buy a Tavor or AUG if youre itching for a bullpup now.
>>
File: image.jpg (78 KB, 1200x635) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
78 KB, 1200x635
I'd love to get one of these
>>
File: ads_big.jpg (733 KB, 2200x913) Image search: [Google]
ads_big.jpg
733 KB, 2200x913
>>28629615
that is perfect for a micro reddot
>>
>>28628892
>This
I'd be in the market for one when and if they get it to the market, and after a few people run the shit out of theirs to verify reliability, identify problems, and let desert tech fix them in the production line.

If this snowflake makes it that far, I will buy one.
>Tfw they don't make an AUG in something that isn't 5.56. Not that I dislike 5.56, I would rather have a larger cartridge though, especially if I can't have a giggle switch.
>>
>>28629445
>>28629474
The .223 version is the same price, lighter, and more accurate. There's literally no reason to buy the X95 over this.

At least the market price of the SAR21 has dropped to more reasonable levels, but the X95? No way.
>>
>>28630084
>tfw no AUG in 6.5 Grendel
>>
File: AUG A3 Thales Australia F88AS2.jpg (2 MB, 2400x1601) Image search: [Google]
AUG A3 Thales Australia F88AS2.jpg
2 MB, 2400x1601
>>28630084
>>28630121
this
but a 6.5 Grendel AUG would require a new bolt, a .300 BLK is cooler
>>
>>28630148
.300 BLK is just trendier.
>>
>>28630151
exactly.

6.5 grendel is superior in every meaningful way
>>
>>28629985
This, so much. When are they going to release these?
>>
>>28629985
>>28630177
There's a good chance they'll cost more than the MDR even. KelTec is only going to do limited runs of them as a special edition/collector's item.
https://www.full30.com/video/5a107192f8f5d5faea9b265413804c84
>>
>>28630212
Tactifudds btfo
>>
>>28630161
>>28630151
.300 BLK use the same bolt as 5.56 NATO
and AUG is a quick barrel change gun
all you need is a new barrel
>>
File: 1.jpg (3 MB, 2867x1744) Image search: [Google]
1.jpg
3 MB, 2867x1744
>>
File: 2.jpg (3 MB, 1779x2811) Image search: [Google]
2.jpg
3 MB, 1779x2811
>>28630329
>>
>>28628868
k&m m17s is what I would get for a bullpup, because reasons
>>
File: 3.jpg (3 MB, 1836x2617) Image search: [Google]
3.jpg
3 MB, 1836x2617
>>28630347
>>
File: calicom100.jpg (35 KB, 500x374) Image search: [Google]
calicom100.jpg
35 KB, 500x374
>>28630148
I'd much rather have a 6.5 over .300, But I'd take either over 5.56. Whatever that company in the US that made AUG clones was, MSAR, was supposed to make 6.5 SPC conversion kits and rifles available. But, then they folded, and it was as vapor as Half Life 3. Picture for pictures sake.
>>
File: 4.jpg (3 MB, 1836x2662) Image search: [Google]
4.jpg
3 MB, 1836x2662
>>28630362
>>
File: 5.jpg (3 MB, 1790x2570) Image search: [Google]
5.jpg
3 MB, 1790x2570
>>28630378
You can see how they got the weight down so much - the bolt carrier group is miniscule. They better be pretty confident in their sealed system fouling protection, because there isn't a whole lot of reciprocating mass inertia there if the carrier gets slowed down by something.

The delayed free-float tappet piston is neat as hell though. I don't doubt the 1 MOA claim if their MDR barrel blanks are the same Walther Lothar CHF as their SRS line.
>>
>>28630418
>>28630418
Why is featured price almost double the msrp
>>
>>28631565
I think they mean with the paint scheme and scope and shit. None of which most of us want.

Fuck I wish the M43 wasn't set to be limited run.
>>
>>28631565
The accessories.
>>
>>28631565
accessories
scope 1495
rings 279
>>
>>28629945
>Been in testing for a couple of years
>Straya's pretty atheist m8
>Has been bought by the ADF and is in the process of entering service
>For fucking the enemy
http://www.army.gov.au/Our-work/News-and-media/1-RAR-first-to-receive-enhanced-F88

It's already had tens or hundreds of thousands of rounds fired through it and has been reviewed by 3rd party:
http://rogueadventurer.com/tag/ef88/
>>
File: JMB.jpg (28 KB, 611x400) Image search: [Google]
JMB.jpg
28 KB, 611x400
>>28629945
This post displeases JMB
>>
>>28628868
Ian-sama seems impressed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1nKr7_VozU
>>
>>28628977
>I paid a shitload for my RFB, therefore the RDB is shit and no one should get one.
>>
non battle proven, expensive, still not out, still feels prototype
>>
>>28628868
>Posts 3 subjective points to "support" something he's clearly made his mind up on
>Asks to be red pilled
Thread replies: 55
Thread images: 15

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.