http://strawpoll.me/6455030
Cuz plate carriers are foe fagets
Bumb
>>28433804
Get the LC-1 since you can actually find its components.
All the collectors are gunning for the 1967 stuff because muh nam.
Bamb
>>28433818
I found some m67 on amazon, believe it or not.
>>28433804
>cuz plate carriers arent for poorfags
Ftfy
Nothin wrong with web gear though. Not everything calls for plates.
>>28433844
It's obviously not abundant since there's only one of 2/3 of them and only a few components. Look at the prices too. That's a lot for just one pouch if you're going to use it.
It's been like that for years now.
>>28433869
The only benefit for plate carriers is if your in shitistan. Unnecessarily heavy for walking around or going on patrols and besides, they dont look good.
>>28433827
M1956 fuck yeah
Canvas is quieter in the bush anyway
>>28433904
>going on patrols
Dunno about you but if literally my entire mission is "hey lemme go find a bunch of armed guys to shoot at" (the definition of a patrol), Id rather have armor.
>>28434138
Enjoy the weight when it gets wet.
>>28434157
>implying a wet LC2 canteen pouch doesnt also weigh a gorillion pounds
And its fairly low denier nylon and synthetic shearling.
>>28433804
>http://strawpoll.me/6455030
Both systems work together anyway. H-Harness is better though.
>>28434174
Weight of wet canvas >>> weight of wet nylon
>>28433904
>Unnecessarily heavy
Pathetic manlet detected.
>>28434138
Done with it amigo
>>28434156
Sorry, i mean SHTF scenarios where you would be walking for miles and maybe encounter a few guys.
>>28434233
lol no.
I also got a shit ton of surplus molle II from my brother when he got out of the marines so should i just do that instead? Only downside is its tan and takes up more space for less magazines
>>28433804
I voted and have no idea what either is.
>>28435245
Jesus christ are you 13? I even provided pictures, anon...
