[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
How the fuck is there not a thread on this? http://www.bbc
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 27
How the fuck is there not a thread on this?

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35211294
>>
>>28396150
he cant do shit about it

god i cant wait til he's out of office
>>
>>28396150
It's happening.
>>
There have been many threads over the past week about it. There aren't any more threads because everything is SPECULATION and we have no idea what he'll actually implement
>>
They get deleted
>>
>>28396331
Is our mod still a faggot? I thought that one fucked off already?
>>
>>28396150
Because there's been like 20 of them.
>>
>>28396150
Lurk more
>>
>>28396150
>Can't win support from Congress
>Can't win support from actual elected representatives
>Actual elected representatives, put in office by the actual voting of citizens to represent them.
>Actual elected officials, actually representing their constituents
>frustrating for Obama
go figure.
>>
>>28396150
>claiming Texas OC law is just "openly displaying the fact that they're armed"
>in a negative light
Fuck, it's like there aren't 44 other states allowing this.
>>
File: 1447616548121.jpg (80 KB, 599x557) Image search: [Google]
1447616548121.jpg
80 KB, 599x557
Because one of the moderators was enough of a homosexual over people laughing at chimpouts that they made a shitty sticky ruling that we can't talk about "politics" on /k/

Now all the other faggot mods ban gun control discussion on sight.

Expect this one to 404 prematurely as soon as one of these nu-male c.uckold fudgepackers sees it.
>>
>>28396350

We can talk about any gun, prepping, multitools, /k/ related anime, have 8 shitty tripfag subreddit general threads, /k/ pets, fucking canada/cali subreddit generals, girls with guns, but absolutely no discussion about laws that affect gun ownership
>>
File: 604011[1].png (2 MB, 1196x630) Image search: [Google]
604011[1].png
2 MB, 1196x630
>"We know that we can't stop every act of violence," the president said. "But what if we tried to stop even one? What if Congress did something - anything - to protect our kids from gun violence?"
because never has there been an instance where a gun has saved a kid's life.
>>
Because we all remember the last time he issued a batch of executive orders

>a whole lot of nothing

They were just recommendations and advisories. He can't actually change the law.
>>
>>28396150
There have been a fuckton of these threads today and they have all been pruned/moved to where they belong. I.E. not fucking on /k/.

>>>/pol/ and >>>/news/ are that way
>>
>>28396595
Is that the kid that was babysitting his sister or the one that chased the niggers down the street shooting at the getaway car?

Or was that the same kid?
>>
>>28396595
>instance where a gun has saved a kid's life.
It may have saved his life, but it did expose him to gun violence, and that's not ok.
>>
>>28396350
We have new, better ones that keep rectal cancer like you contained to /pol/.
>>
>>28396595
>some kid used squishybrick to remove menthols

Colour me surprised
>>
>>28396605
Your modding is a joke, Mr. Janitor.
>>
>>28396605
>not fucking on /k/.
This is literally gun-related. In what fucking universe do you live in that this subject isn't appropriate for a predominantly gun-oriented board?
>>
>>28396628
If I was the janitor, this piece of shit thread would already be gone.
>>
>>28396605
While I'm sure it doesn't affect you, it does affect people who actually own guns, which is /k/ related.
>>
>>28396615
Death only takes a second, trauma from gun violence lasts a lifetime

when will we think of the children?
>>
>>28396622
Have you been to /pol/? If you ever venture over there, you'll quickly find out why you cannot discuss politics there.
>>
>>28396638
Oh, so you think if you suck up enough you'll get a position. That's even worse. Shoo shoo, roach.
>>
>>28396605

Fuck of nu male

If the fed tried to ban protein powder or gyms, would you tell /fit/ that it has to go to /pol/?

What about if all cat ownership was banned. Would you tell /an/ to go to /pol/?

What about computers being seized on /g/?

Would /v/ threads about the fed banning Xboxes go only on /pol/ too?

Now go back to your cuck shed
>>
>>28396605
These people are the problem

I don't want to talk to the shithole that is /pol/ about gun control I want to talk to gun owners.

Fuck pruning gun control threads, prune the tripfag circlejerk weaboo videogame threads to /trash/ and let the people that want to talk about guns discuss the future of their rights/property on a board relating to such.
>>
>>28396629
You are so fucking new. At no point has it ever been in good taste to pollute /k/ with political ideology threads. There is nothing weapons about these threads other than the mere mention of the word "gun".
>>
>>28396663
Get fucked nigger, I wouldn't deal with that shit for pay or for free.

>>28396664
Die in a fire cancer.
>>
>>28396664
>Origami is now a hate crime
>/po/ has a shitfit
>mods prune the threads and tell them to go to /pol/
>faggots like the wannabe hotpocket bootlickers sit by and tell us mods know best
>>
>>28396669
>>28396680
>when you're so noguns people can tell just by how autistic you sound on a chan post
Shoo shoo, roach.
>>
>>28396595
but far more kids have died from gun-related violence
>>
michelle took unilateral action on MY DICK
>>
>>28396629
Back before your time, threads about politics (which is what this is) were not well-received here. /pol/ eventually seeped over to /k/ and it was made worse when they decided to semi blow up /pol/ temporarily a while back.
>>
>>28396694
Pretty funny being that you are without a doubt a nogunz.
>>
>>28396680

Why are you even on /k/?

You obviously don't own guns and there's no interracial porn posted on this board
>>
File: 1447703130517.jpg (358 KB, 875x634) Image search: [Google]
1447703130517.jpg
358 KB, 875x634
>>28396669
>to pollute /k/ with political ideology threads

>political ideology threads
>not wanting the hobby/right the board is based around to be banned

>I want the thing we are all here to talk and share pictures about to continue!
>"no you have to go to the nazi /b/ board to talk about that!"


You should probably kill yourself tbqh family.
>>
>>28396705
>[citation needed]
>>
>>28396727
Samefag harder, bro. You came from /pol/. See to it that you return to your exclusion zone.
>>
>>28396561
>Expect this one to 404 prematurely as soon as one of these nu-male c.uckold fudgepackers sees it.
Watch out, last time I called a mod a faggot I got like a week long ban
>>
File: blep.png (15 KB, 259x302) Image search: [Google]
blep.png
15 KB, 259x302
>>28396722
SHOO SHOO
H
O
O

S
H
O
O
>>
>>28396729
Nobody that didn't migrate here from /pol/ shares pictures about their political preferences here. You must be lost.
>>
>>28396666
Holy quads speaks the truth.

I don't want ignorant anti-gun Euros who don't have a fucking spine to shit up a thread about something that they know nothing about at all.
>>
File: cherrypickedshit.png (422 KB, 1196x3376) Image search: [Google]
cherrypickedshit.png
422 KB, 1196x3376
surprisingly you're just as dead if oonga boonga beats you to death with a rock or if Jose stabs you as you are if you get shot to death.
>>
>>28396705
>kids
>>
>>28396711

We used to have political discussions all the time on this board, long before /pol/and /new/ were ever made

It wasn't until this site merged with reddit that it started triggering you nu males
>>
>>28396738
Why bother with a trip when you don't even value /k/ enough to keep it focused on weapons?
>>
File: [000013].jpg (3 MB, 3911x2600) Image search: [Google]
[000013].jpg
3 MB, 3911x2600
>>28396735
It's ok ill just change my IP and call them a faggot again XD

I'm fuggin invincible
>>
>>28396622
You know what makes you a piece of shit and garbage on /k/?

This is /news/ related, not /pol/. Faggot.
>>
File: 605.gif (3 MB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
605.gif
3 MB, 480x360
>>28396758
>value /k/
Best shit I've heard all week.
>>
>>28396756
Proof that you're new as fuck being that what you said is wholly false. Political discussion used to be rare here unless it was talking about geopolitics relating to a war.
>>
>>28396669
>>28396711
I've been here since 2007, and I can assure you that gun politics threads were very much accepted until relatively recently.
>>
>>28396732

>multiple people calling you retarded
>check your privi.. Err.. Go back to /pol/
>>
>>28396771
And yet you still want to be able to be uniquely identified by people here...
>>
>>28396743
>migrate here from /pol/
Actually I was forced out of my home board by faggot moderators and their shitlicking janitors and /pol/ is the only place that has gun control threads

So if anything faggots like you made me go to /pol/ and pick up pictures of my "political ideology"

>nobody shares pictures of their political preferences here

How fucking new are you kid? we used to have plenty of threads making fun of antigunners and democraps before joot took over and gave BLM members mod positions.

What the fuck are you even doing here? you are on a board about firearms crying that progun people should go away to their containment zone.
>>
>>28396776
This right here. It only started when little crybabies came to /k/ then directed people to /pol/ when it opened because people were hurting their feelings with words.

Talking about how shitty gun laws and how shit the politicians pushing those laws were normal for a long time.
>>
File: Dustcovercomposite.jpg (3 MB, 3072x3440) Image search: [Google]
Dustcovercomposite.jpg
3 MB, 3072x3440
>>28396781
I like autistic anons to have a target when they fly into a shitpost-induced rage. :^

How about killing yourself, neh?
>>
>>28396756
This. /k/ has been invaded by a shitload of noguns who do nothing but shit post and show support for gun control...on FUCKING /k/! What ever dumb fuck admin or moderator decided laws pertaining weapons aren't weapon related should be fucking gassed. But they don't care what the users of 4chan think obviously or we wouldn't even be having this debate. Fuckers are just power hungry and want to control discussion. If they really wanted to clean up the board there wouldn't be literal video game threads, animal threads, movie threads, anime threads and all this other bullshit that is on /k/. This board is infested with noguns
>>
>>28396778
What do I care what nigger fucking newfag cancer like you has to say? /k/ used be be SIGNIFICANTLY more weapons as a % of content than it is today.
>>
>>28396759
why do you have this pictures saved? why is he using boxers as a coaster?
>>
>>28396781
what's easier to see from 50 feet away? a billboard or a stickynote?
>>
>>28396793
No, it started when /pol/ invaded /k/. You have the cause and effect completely and totally backwards.
>>
>>28396774

I thought you were serious, but now it's obvious you're just fucking with me.

2/10 because you actually baited me with your retarded troll for this long
>>
>>28396776
I can assure you that you're full of shit.
>>
>>28396776
Spoken like a true new arrival.
>>
>>28396150
There have been dozens in the last few days. They are getting pruned and/or moved. Now you know.
>>
>>28396811
/pol/ never invaded /k/, /k/ has talked shit about antigunners and gun control forever predating /new/ /news/ and /pol/

then you asshurt faggots showed up and started crying that we needed to take a good quarter of what was discussed on the board and go to one of the containment boards so your feelings would not be hurt.

If you don't want to hear about guncontrol fuck off to opchan or reddit.
>>
>>28396815
>>28396826
You can stop samefagging now.
>>
>>28396623
How about since you spelled color with a u I color you noguns.
>>
File: Dirty Harry Model 29.jpg (304 KB, 2880x1620) Image search: [Google]
Dirty Harry Model 29.jpg
304 KB, 2880x1620
This thread never had a chance.
>>
File: 1449020388484.jpg (27 KB, 508x566) Image search: [Google]
1449020388484.jpg
27 KB, 508x566
>>28396797
im sorry i asked you before what that optic was and i forgot i just got my return form email from eocuck.
>>
>>28396801
There used to be threads just about shitting on politicians, and dumb shit they said about guns. We've had Dianne Feinstein hate threads for years. If current events or politics directly effect the topic, discussion should be allowed.
>>
>>28396846
I can't stop what I never started, kiddo.
>>
>>28396811
>when /pol/ invaded /k/
yeah, you're new. there never used to be a /pol/ years ago broseph. there is no /pol/ invasion of /k/. only little thin-skinned children cried about racism or political/news discussion on /k/ and ruined that aspect of the board.

so you hate what the content is of the OP - why? its firearm related. what about the fucking anime all over the board? or circlejerking and shitty off-topic trap posts and discussion?

>>28396815
no, he's not full of shit because I have been here since then as well. you are just a newfag who thinks he knows better. when before /pol/ even opened it was all crying about the racism on it and project chanology crybabies had gotten it in their head that the creation of /pol/ is the reason for racism on 4chan, which is wholly incorrect. its fucking 4chan. racism is a staple of the fucking site.

but hey, little faggots swarmed to the site for le fresh meme and get their little asses butthurt over what 4chan is and do everything they can to fucking change it to reddit and tumblr
>>
>>28396800

I've been here since 05 bro. We used to routinely talk about politics and guns on /b/ before the hobby boards are created, and then all of that migrated to /k/ and /n/

You were literally not born yet at that time

Keep calling me a newfag though, it always makes smile everytime someone on any board calls another person that. It shows me that you just flew in from tumblr
>>
>>28396815
I've been on here since about '06, and as far back as I can remember there has been gun politics discussion on /k/. There's also been whiners whining about people discussing politics on /k/ for about that long too.
>>
File: tus_title.jpg (37 KB, 797x274) Image search: [Google]
tus_title.jpg
37 KB, 797x274
>>28396750
>>28396730
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States#20th_century
>>
>>28396857
Primary Arms MD-ADS.
>>
>>28396841
>/k/ was always stormfag central
Fuck right back to your trailer
>>
>>28396811
/k/ had threads about shooting niggers since before /pol/ existed. Do you not remember all the old redguard posts? You're trying to sanitize /k/ and make it your safe space, and you're being called out for it.

You wouldn't even be accepted by /r/guns. Get the hell out of here.
>>
I come to /k/ just for gun control threads
>>
>>28396871
/pol/ absolutely invaded /k/ when they brought the hammer down on /pol/ a while back. It was here before that, but not even close to as much as today. Same thing happened post-/new/ but pre-/pol/.
>>
>>28396800

Banning the dozen or so shit posting generals that are on topic in name only would instantly clean up this board far more than removing political discussion
>>
>>28396877
that means literally nothing. show me a list of lives saved in defensive shootings.
>>
>>28396879
thankyou man. would it be stupid to put one of those on a p308? im picking one up monday for new for cheap.
>>
>>28396888
same
>>
>>28396873
>The guy you replied to didn't use the word newfag
>Keep calling me a newfag
>>
>>28396899
Circlejerk generals like AK general, AR general, EDC, etc are infinitely better than threads like this.
>>
>>28396880

Move the goal post some more

>anyone that opposes chocolate nixon is a racist by default
>>
>>28396880
>there were no racists on /k/ before /new/
>/pol/ is the reason gun owners don't like democrats and blacks

>trailer redneck memes

I'm gonna say you have not been here longer than late 2013 and that's a stretch.
>>
File: WP_20151114_003[2].jpg (2 MB, 2483x1728) Image search: [Google]
WP_20151114_003[2].jpg
2 MB, 2483x1728
>>28396908
Holds up to lots of shock, so you should be good if you get it.
>>
>>28396877
>a total of like 100 people in the last 25 years
>oh no ban all guns!!!!!
>>
>>28396846
> posts separated by less time that the post timer
> samefag
>>
>>28396925
i figured since i wasnt getting a scar-h it would hold up fairly well lul
>>
>>28396911

Replied to the wrong person, meant for >>28396826
>>
>>28396851
Snap snap snap motherfucker
>>
>>28396891
are you fucking stupid? who do you think browsed /new/ before it was closed up? everyone. everyone who browsed the other boards. and you know what? you dont know what the fuck you are talking about. /new/ started before /pol/. it is what /new/ became. why? because everyone on the site went to the /new/ board to see current events, and vent over racial statistics.

that means nothing to talking about current news events of gun control trying to take away our fucking hobby, what this board is partially dedicated to.

jesus tapdancing christ. crying about something directly fucking related because of the racism boogeyman. how the fuck do some of you even function in society if you get so upset over what other peoples opinions
>>
>>28396912
Gun control threads were better before they turned into shitpost threads where we have to fight 5 trips/faggots crying to go to /pol/ in the first 10 posts
>>
>>28396623

>colour

Australia or Germany

Which one does your cuck shed reside in?
>>
>>28396948
>how the fuck do some of you even function in society
Fuck society, how does he sit on 4chan.
>>
>>28396920
Everyone crying about racism or to go back to /pol/ is a Project Chanology muh legion faggot or way newer.
>>
>>28396948
Read the post you just quoted. He very clearly said /new/ came before /pol/. It's you're going to rant, at least rant based on what someone actually said.

That's 4chan shitfest 101.
>>
>>28396952
Gun control threads were always disproportionately dominated by tripfags talking about the exact same things over and over again with each other.
>>
>>28396965
Yeah. That's the worst part of all of this.
>>
>>28396948

Don't forget /n/, which was the political board before /k/was even created

Everyone on that board migrated to /k/

That board was the same as /new/, but tumbr and reddit web 2.0 shit hasn't started yet, so it was a completely different board, but it was doing a lot of raids, so it got closed for liability
>>
>>28396948
I don't see anyone complaining about the racist banter on this board in this thread. It's the focus on politics I see complaining about.
>>
File: fully loaded glocks.jpg (30 KB, 342x195) Image search: [Google]
fully loaded glocks.jpg
30 KB, 342x195
>>28396150
>>28396600
he can and does actually change the law. remember obamacare?

its time to give up your guns, because you aint gonna use them when they come to take them away. faggots.
>>
>>28396983
Same with generals that are equally bad

Gear queer is the most cancerous by far, followed by /arg/ and /ak/
>>
>>28397001
Obamacare (which was directly modeled on a Romney-backed and signed law from Massachusetts) was passed in both the House and Senate...
>>
>>28396948
Mm, are you even sure you're quoting the right post? Cool your jets son.

I mean wasn't it last year when /pol/ invaded /k/ because moot unleashed a SJW banhammerer on the board? It was either last year or the year before, I don't remember.

Either way that's what he was talking about. (I'm pretty sure)
>>
>>28397001
>>
>>28397012

Generals are just killing every board right now

/fit has more generals than regular threads some days.

I wouldn't mind if it wasn't tripshit circle jerking and stayed on topic.
>>
>>28397000
That is the fucking basis of "go back to /pol/".
>>
File: yxUMH4S.jpg (1 MB, 1361x1500) Image search: [Google]
yxUMH4S.jpg
1 MB, 1361x1500
>>28396974

I've been posting on 4Chan since it's first year of existence, racism is dumb
>>
>>28397012
At least they are actually about weapons, accessories, etc. This isn't even about guns. This is about partisan politics. Nobody should care what anyone else's politics are on this board, as long as they enjoy weapons as either a direct or indirect hobby.
>>
>>28397037

Also against the rules, be cool if they actually enforced it
>>
>>28397001
Speak for yourself noguns. I will gladly use mine. Luckily it wouldn't be against my local PD. They are all progun Obama haters anyways.
>>
>>28397035
No it's not at all you dumb nigger. The basis of "go back to /pol/", at least as it pertains to /k/, is based on not wanting to see shitposting threads that are shitposting threads first, politics second, and weapons a very distant third (at best).
>>
>>28397042
>these politicians are trying to take away as much of the hobby as they can
>you can't talk about that here


>Nobody should care what anyone else's politics are on this board

>I voted for democraps and now they want to take the guns I don't own, you should go to a containment board and not hurt my feelings calling my candidates niggers.
>>
>>28397042
>This isn't even about guns
>Gun Control
Fucking retard.
>>
>>28397037
Yeah and it shouldn't be the underlying reason why /news/ threads are not allowed on /k/ when it affects the hobby. Just like anyplace, if its against the rules then it gets reported and not shitposted to oblivion by crying men.
>>
>>28397000
It would be nice if we had a "gun law" section with 1 thread on current gun control measures (currently Obama EOs), one on challenges to existing legislation (Heller), and one or two on lobbying organizations. That would somewhat contain the political commentary (as much as possible on a firearm forum anyway)
>>
>>28397056
>>28397037
I don't think many people here care about generic racist banter. It's when you have entire threads based on "muh jews" and "muh chimpouts" that people get annoyed becasue they aren't even weapons threads.

I don't care at all if people toss around nigger, or kike, or beaner, or whatever as long as the thread isn't based on it.
>>
>>28397063
That doesn't even make sense. Why are you trying to banish people who want to actually talk about guns and not whatever your political preferences are?
>>
>>28397042
>This isn't even about guns
I can't even begin to comprehend the mental gymnastics you did to convince yourself of this.
>>
>>28397067
See, now that's what it should be. There should be a gun law general where all this shit can be contained. Could be a sticky too for all I care.
>>
File: Capture.png (6 KB, 845x117) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
6 KB, 845x117
Don't forget to vote for Sanders. 8 more years of the democrat party.

;^)
>>
>>28397093
Go ahead and find where all the talk about actual guns is in this thread.
>>
just go to /pol/ to talk about this shit

the fate of the nation does not depend on a 4chan thread, especially one that we've had five million times before.
>>
>>28397067
That's actually a pretty good idea.
>>
>>28397085
>Why are you trying to banish people who want to actually talk about guns
I'm not the one talking about banishing people

>and not whatever your political preferences are
>we should remove people talking about shitty politicians proposing/implementing gun control on a gun forum

If we were on /v/ and Obama came on TV and said "I want to ban all videogames because stupid reasons", should /v/ not be allowed to discuss how stupid it/he is because you take offense to politics and politics and people having different opinions than you.

Secondly I don't understand why you people defending these politicians are here, why would you be sitting on a gun board crying that bashing antigun politicians should be banned if you had any interest/investment in firearms?
>>
>>28397109
I'll have to sort through all the people telling you to choke on your own noguns cock, so give me a bit
>>
>>28396150

>Oh no, how terrible! People who sell guns should be properly licensed!
>>
>>28397137
>people who sell their private property to other citizens through private sales should be licensed

Are you a Euro or did you fall for the gunshow loophole meme?
>>
>>28397126
Cite the post where anyone is defending a politician on here.

Protip you illiterate nigger: You can't.

Quit making shit up faggot.
>>
So what does this actually do? Most intelligent people doing person to person transfers just go through an FFL anyway, because they are law abiding citizens and can afford the fifty dollar fee. A criminal will only get a gun from another criminal, or someone stupid enough to put their wellbeing at risk by not going through an FFL

I don't understand. Everything he's talking about is already fucking law.
>>
>>28397130
So you're admitting you can't because they pretty much don't exist in this thread. Thanks for clearing that up.
>>
>>28397174
>Cite the post where anyone is defending a politician on here.

>Any post telling someone to go to /pol/ for calling out democraps

You don't have to write a fucking novel stating your support for Obama to tell someone who does not to leave him alone.

>oh no this racist said something mean about my candidate!
>go back to /pol/ stormweenie!
>>
>>28397067
This is the only worthwhile post in the entirety of this thread.
>>
File: over your head.gif (804 KB, 1307x734) Image search: [Google]
over your head.gif
804 KB, 1307x734
>>28397195
Not one single post in this thread has told anyone to stop shitting on democrats or leave specifically because of it.
>>
>>28397175

>Most intelligent people doing person to person transfers just go through an FFL anyway, because they are law abiding citizens and can afford the fifty dollar fee.

No, no they don't.

Well, maybe in Commiefornia, but in the Free States we sell our personal property as God intended, face to face at a Walmart parking lot paid in cash.

>$50 FFL fee

Jesus. Bootlicking AND paying for the privilege!
>>
>>28397195
Can you go ahead and point out where these Obama-defending posts are?
>>
>>28397232
>Buying used anything
Poorfag detected
>>
>>28397035
>gun law threads on /pol/

>hey I heard that nigger Obama be trying to take our guns
>fuck the jews
>gas 24/7 1488
>kek m8 ur a britbong stop posting here
>cuckuckuckuck

>hey I heard someone's trying to reopen the machine gun registry
>never gona happen Obama won't allow it
>fuck that nigger he won't be here forever
>oh yeah but the jews will stop it the NWO is coming soon
>thread passes the point of no return
>kek epic bantz m8
>pay denbts

/pol/ is 60%+ eurocucks who are manifestly unqualified to discuss what is primarily an American issue
>>
>>28397232
Actually, the majority of all legal gun purchases are done through FFLs.
>>
>>28397213

>>28397195
>You don't have to write a fucking novel stating your support for Obama to tell someone who does not to leave him alone.

Give me another reason why progun people browsing a gun forum would tell people trying to inform other progun people on a gun forum attempting to inform their fellow enthusiasts about bullshit legislation that they should help to prevent would cry that said poster should fuck off to a containment board other than supporting the candidate/legislation.


>>28397175
>Most intelligent people doing person to person transfers just go through an FFL anyway,

Maybe in antigun states that legislated the right not to away, nobody on facebook gun trading groups/armslist does.
>>
>>28397067
Wait, why hasn't this happened already?
>>
>>28397037
Damn she was a hot minx back then, with some more intelligent ideas

Must have gotten senile, or being literally cucked by Bill turned her into a political cuck as well
>>
>>28397244

But we're talking about person-to-person sales. I don't know a single person who sells their own guns through an FFL.
>>
>>28397185
They don't exist in this thread because as usual, we had fucking retards (including yourself) conduct a massive derail about how this thread should be on /pol/. Don't blame the thread for your own doing.
>>
>>28397250
You lack the mental capacity for basic critical thinking. Nobody in this thread defended Obama or is saying they agree with these actions.

Learn to fucking read, nigger. All you've done is create a false narrative in your head, claim someone said something they didn't, and then proceeded to argue against the point that you yourself actually made up.
>>
>>28397175
No you idiot. Universal background checks are only required in 18 states. 32 states don't require them and guess what, those states aren't magically more dangerous or violent than the other 18.

Universal background checks are an infringement of the 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms because universal background checks contribute to the creation of a federal registry of gun owners and guns. This is the registry that will be used once confiscation begins, whether that's in 5 years, 25 or 50 years, if it is to happen it will require a registry.

The 2nd amendment protects the ability for individuals to make private sales between one another. When all sales are required to go through an FFL you are setting up a system where the government has to much power deciding who can and who can't have guns.

They simply put you on the no-fly list or the no-buy list because you visit /k/, and without private sales you've got no ability to keep and bear an arm now.

Remember the internment of 100,000 Japanese Americans during WWII. Consider the racist rhetoric regarding muslims that is rampant in our current election.

SHALL NOT
>>
>>28397260
It's in the second stickied thread, courtesy of our illustrious mod(s).
>Friendly Reminder: /k/ is a board devoted to weapons and military equipment. Discussions about politics or current events belong on /pol/.
>>
>>28397271
This thread was derailed from the original post you insufferable faggot. Good job proving that you made shit up.
>>
>>28397287
Holy shit you fucking nigger go gas yourself right now

>>28397265
Agreed, any more Hillary qt pics?
>>
>>28397293
There's no reason it couldn't be amended to allow either an open gun law sticky or a single "Gun Laws General" at a time.

I really don't see the problem in keeping gun law discussion on /k/ but containing it to a more orderly thread instead of having 15 of them at a time all talking about the same thing.
>>
File: 1449889036280.jpg (150 KB, 700x473) Image search: [Google]
1449889036280.jpg
150 KB, 700x473
>>28397037
>Barry Goldwater wanted to re-segregate the nation

lmao open a history book
>>
>>28397297
>original post about Obama's plan to EO some new gun laws into existence
>massive derail about how gun politics should go to /pol/
I think you'll find /b/ is more your speed; you don't have to read or think, just shitpost.
>>
>>28397260

It's easy to dismiss a progun argument thread when the next thread is about gassing je. ws and c.urbstomping blacks

>>28397281
As I have stated multiple times none has simply stated "hey I like obama be nice get out"


>Nobody in this thread defended Obama or is saying they agree with these actions.

I never said they did, you don't have to wave a sign saying you love Obama to make posts attempting to push people that don't out of the board.

I have explained this multiple times to you but you keep asking for proof of something I never claimed then have the audacity to insinuate I am the one who lacks critical thinking skills.
>>
>>28397329
Considering that dozens of other identical threads have been moved or pruned in just the past couple days, yes, the original post is a derail.
>>
>>28397293
See >>28397242

And people just make threads anyway, resulting in a bunch of duplication and generally lowering the quality of discussion
>>
>>28396150
>obama throwing a temper tantrum
What's new?
>>
>>28397329
> implying duplicate, borderline spam threads like this aren't shitposting.
>>
>>28397329
it is physically not possible to EO any laws into existence because EOs have no legislative authority or weight.
>>
>>28397339
>>28397357
This is the only such thread in the catalog. Are you retarded?
>>
>>28397336
You very directly are claiming that the people who are saying take this to /pol/ or /news/ are defending Obama.

The same people calling for the thread to be moved also show up in pro-gun control threads and tell those dipshits to get the fuck out.

You're just a fucking retard who can't understand that this has nothing to do with partisan politics and everything to do with politics in general.
>>
>>28397373
Because the others are getting deleted you dense fucking syphilitic cunt. There have been a metric fuckton of these exact threads today and yesterday.
>>
>>28397314
>Holy shit you fucking nigger go gas yourself right now

Oh yeah real reasonable response directly addressing the arguments I put forward.

In 32 states law abiding citizens can sell and buy firearms privately without the involvement of a FEDERALLY LICENSED FIREARMS DEALER.

This should be the case in all 50 states.

Federally mandated universal background checks will be the biggest gun grab next to the actual gun grab.
>>
File: DSCF1467.jpg (3 MB, 3264x1840) Image search: [Google]
DSCF1467.jpg
3 MB, 3264x1840
>>28396561
If it's not in http://www.4chan.org/rules it's not a rule.

>not having a script to autohide stickies
>>
File: nvDnnry.jpg (71 KB, 625x564) Image search: [Google]
nvDnnry.jpg
71 KB, 625x564
>>28396150
nothing will happen. If he could have done anything without congress over the last 7 years he would have.
>>
>>28397377
>You very directly are claiming that the people who are saying take this to /pol/ or /news/ are defending Obama.
Or his stances on the issue/the democratic party

>this has nothing to do with partisan politics
Helps with that notion

>stop bring up partisan politics
>it's not like me voting democrat has anything to do with gun control!

>The same people calling for the thread to be moved also show up in pro-gun control threads and tell those dipshits to get the fuck out.

>these are the same anonymous posters arguing points in stark opposition to eachother because I said so

The people telling antis to get the fuck out do so because antis are retards

the people telling anti gun control threads to gtfo are in denial about their party or support these actions.

>>28397402
Which is why I will keep making them and posting in them ignoring faggot mods until joot changes the rules and I have to go to some fag forum.
>>
>>28397336
People also push pro-gun control threads out. Same shit. It's all politics and doesn't belong here.

It's understood that almost everyone on /k/ is anti-gun control. We don't need pro-gun control troll threads. And we don't need anti-gun control politics threads because we know everyone pretty much already agrees with them. It's just redundant bullshit that's only tangentially related to the board and lowers the overall quality.

Even the Russiaboo and Chinaboo threads are tolerated because at least they are about weapons and military affairs, even though almost everyone in those threads is shitting on Russia/Chinaboos.
>>
>>28397430
And nobody is disagreeing dumbass. Nobody in this thread is posting in support of these measures.
>>
>>28396771
Tumblrtale should go back to the containment board that is /vg/.
>>
>>28397414
So why is he doing it now?

>>28397371
What is the purpose of this announcement, then, if it's doomed to fail? He has no need to gain popularity, it's his last term.
>>
File: gundertale.png (105 KB, 405x312) Image search: [Google]
gundertale.png
105 KB, 405x312
>>28397440
Is that attention you seem to be giving me?
>>
>>28397430
> tries to dictate who can and can't go on /k/
> gets mad when someone applies it to him

Yep, that's you alright.
>>
>>28396150
CONDUCTOR WE HAVE A PROBLEM
>>
>>28396561
>nu-male cuckold fudgepackers

Some serious keks right there, but an accurate description

I would support Phil and muslimbro as mods
>>
>>28397371
>EOs have no legislative authority or weight.
I see someone has never read about Franklin Roosevelt.
>>
>>28397431
>People also push pro-gun control threads out. Same shit. It's all politics and doesn't belong here.

no

>>28397430
>The people telling antis to get the fuck out do so because antis are retards

>the people telling anti gun control threads to gtfo are in denial about their party or support these actions.


>And we don't need anti-gun control politics threads because we know everyone pretty much already agrees with them.
Some people use /k/ as a gun news website and like to see updates on things happening across the country or when a politician turns on them.

Also there are new users that get to see the slew of actions being taken against us discussed by reasonable people instead of being forced to sit in the shithole that is /pol/ and deal with foreigners that know nothing about our laws and neonazis propagating further stupidity.

>>28397438
I am suggesting that a lot of the people that started propagating the gb2/pol/ meme are either antis or people that voted left and are in denial that their actions are effecting their rights.

>>28397458
last I checked there was no sticky telling people not to make pro gun control threads, I have no issue with them being made because people call them out on their stupidity and it ends.

When someone makes a thread notifying other people on /k/ about gun control upcoming and it gets banned because of butthurt I have a problem.
>>
>>28397431

I think we could use better background checks and probably stricter licensing
>>
>>28397497
I disagree, blow yourself you noodle armed, cum guzzling diaper hippy.

See? nobody had to leave the board what an amazing thing.
>>
>>28397497
Okay.

The point is that none of this shit belongs on /k/.
>>
>>28397497
I think you should have to pay taxes, not be on public benefits, and have an IQ test to own guns.
>>
>>28397494
> last I checked there was no sticky telling people not to make pro gun control threads
It's literally in the 2nd sticky dipshit.
>>
>>28397541
So you want to disarm the marines?
>>
>>28397497
Better background checks cost money

By "licensing" I'm assuming you mean CC permits, which varies greatly between states
>>
>>28397494
So you're saying that pro-gun control threads do belong on /k/ and the politics threads don't detract from the overall quality of the board.

That all the evidence we need to know that you shouldn't be taken seriously.
>>
>>28397497

30,000 firearm deaths per year
20,000 are suicide
7-8000 are gang or crime related
The rest are "mass shootings" and bona fide murders.

More than 30,000 people die each year in car accidents. Accidents by definition are preventable.

More than 500,000 Americans die each year due to preventable heart disease and lung cancer.

Go focus on the real issues requiring policy solutions rather than infringing on the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

More background checks and stricter licensing won't reduce the number of gun deaths. Even if it did, any increase in gun control is a unacceptable infringement upon our capability as citizens to hold the government and politicians morally accountable for their actions, as well as defend ourselves and our other constitutional rights from being attacked or weakened.

What keeps the government from infringing upon our 1st amendment right to freedom of speech and religion, why the 2nd amendment of course. The one that guarantees that you can own an AR-15
>>
>>28396705
The fuck?
You know what kills more people than guns?
Bare hands. Hammers. Knives. Guns are low on the list you liberal faggot.
>>
>>28397534
>background checks on GUNS
>stricter licensing for GUNS
>none of this shit belongs on a board largely about GUNS
You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you? Whether you agree or disagree with him, doesn't change the fact that it is a subject inextricably linked to weapons.
>>
>>28397554
> background checks
Cuck states like california need to populate their data into NICS, problem fixed.
> licensing
Maybe you're too young to remember the days when CHL's were not shall issue. It creates an easy mechanism to disarm the populous.
>>
>>28397534
>>28397544

This is a relevant issue that is related to weapons. While the mods may have made a rule prohibiting gun control discussion, this rule is wrong and counter productive towards the security of this country and its people.

>>28397541
>IQ test to own guns

Are you fucking kidding?
>>
>>28397550

Couldn't hurt
>>
File: Murrika.png (11 KB, 624x444) Image search: [Google]
Murrika.png
11 KB, 624x444
'Guns don't kill people, people kill people' is my favourite epic may-may.

Seriously though, America, you're fucking idiots and I can't wait until owning a gun becomes completely illegal in every state.

Something that WILL happen in our lifetimes. Maybe not under Obama, but in the next 20-30 years you can guarantee it. :^)
>>
>>28397584
+reps
>>
>>28397561
>So you're saying that pro-gun control threads do belong on /k/
I'm saying we are adults and I think we can handle discussing our differences of opinions when faggots invade without giving supreme executive power to fucking hotpockets.

>and the politics threads don't detract from the overall quality of the board.

I think they are much better than /arg/akg/ak/gq/v/ generals constantly being made to circlejerk in.
>>
>>28397596
gr8 b8 m8.
>>
>>28397562

Pretty disingenuous argument, you can tackle more than one problem at once, just because you've deemed something "low priority" doesn't mean you shouldn't work at making it better
>>
>>28397586
That's the thing, the status of CHL permits is a state issue not a federal one. Therefore the guy I was replying to needs to direct his complaint to the state not federal level
>>
>>28397562
9022/310,000,000 *100 = .003% of guns are used in murders, or, for every gun used in a murder, there are 33,000+ that are not


www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32842.pdf

http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/fact-sheets/2013/firearm-safety-in-america-2013.aspx?s=&st=&ps=

http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-states
Source on homicide numbers

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_8_murder_victims_by_weapon_2008-2012.xls

I like progun/antigun threads because they help you form arguments.
>>
>>28397596
10,000 homicides per year due to guns.

8000 of which are gang and or crime related meaning that any increase in gun control laws will not reduce those numbers.

Furthermore the violent crime rate is much higher in the UK for example. That includes rape and robbery. Sure no one is dying but are you really prepared evaluate the intrinsic detrimental value of a rapes and robberies vs a deaths?

At what point do you decide that the increase in rapes and robberies are worth it?
>>
>>28397601
> I think they are much better than /arg/akg/ak/gq/v/ generals constantly being made to circlejerk in.

Then you're a brain dead chimp. At least those are directly military, weapons, and accessories related.
>>
>>28397596
see
>>28397621


It's not the guns, if it was the guns we would all be fucking dead.
>>
>>28397602
What b8? Look at the fucking chart you absolute mong.

It's amazing that it's 2016 and they still aren't illegal yet. Only a matter of time... Better stock up and start thinking about secret stashes m8, because you're going to need it.

Obama is just the start. Mark my words. Owning a gun will become illegal in all states. No 'muh 200 year old document' defense is going to save you now.
>>
>>28397541

Ideally I'd like to see us with a system like Switzerland in place
>>
>>28397596

I agree. Guns are bad. We need to ban this sick filth.
>>
>>28397628
>hey guise I bought x brand how did I do
>haha you faggot not buying y brand, what are you poor or something
>you welfare cunts cant even afford z brand lmao

Yea I prefer discussing current events relating to firearms than circlejerking with those faggots.
>>
>>28397626
>>28397634
>Trying to argue against that chart

HAHAHAHAHA OH WOW.
Let's get this started
>Ameridumbs
>>
>>28397621
>310m firearms

Is it 1992 still? There are 'officially' 360m firearms, but probably closer to 500-600m firearms in circulation in the US.
>>
>>28397609
Making it better how?

Gun control has worked just great in bongistan, one of the highest murder rates in the Western world

Whereas US states that legalize CC have almost universally seen a drop in crime
>>
>>28397637

Ideally, you should go to hell.

My gun license is as follows:
"shall not be infringed"
>>
>>28397653
It's a conservative estimate change it to 0.001% if you like with the increase in gun ownership and decrease in violent crime over the past 20 years.
>>
>>28397655

Well, for a start it would be nice if there were less violence and more sex in media
>>
>>28397661

Yeah, but you're retarded, your opinion is worthless
>>
>>28397626
>meaning that any increase in gun control laws will not reduce those numbers.

Eh.. doesn't mean that at all.

I'd wager that these gangs wouldn't try half the shit they do at the moment without the backing of lethal weapons.

>Robbery
With what? A wooden stick? No chance.
>Gang war
With what fists? Please. These people are fucking cowards. They wouldn't so much as look at someone the wrong way if they weren't packing.
>>
>>28397673
Go to pornhub if you want sex

Go to 4chan if you want violence
>>
>>28397596
>but in the next 20-30 years you can guarantee it. :^)
And you will also see the next revolution. Also gr8 b8. If not b8, fuck off noguns eurocuck
>>
>>28397609
What about my argument is disingenuous?

If a problem is low priority that literally means that it should be solved after other problems have been solved.

If the only solutions to said low-priority problem are infringements upon 2nd amendment rights now you've got a situation where the problem is low priority and the possible solutions seem tenuous in their probable success and or possibly contingent in the creation of larger problems, problems with great priority such as a non representational faux democracy which is actually an oligarchy at this point ruled by political families.

It's like your little kid coming up to you and saying, hey dad I think I figured out a way that we can pick up less of our dog's poop. Let's just feed the dog less.

Low priority problem, shitty solution bound to create high priority problems. That's gun control for you, a distraction from the real issues, focusing on a controversial and traditionally bi-partisan argument of which one side clings to feelings and the other clings to the esoteric albeit ultimately important founding philosophies of this country.
>>
File: 1445121975826.png (469 KB, 800x903) Image search: [Google]
1445121975826.png
469 KB, 800x903
reminder that anyone who thinks GUN LAW THREADS don't belong on /k/ or say "this doesn't belong on /k/ it belongs on /pol/!" they are nogunz and their posts should immediately be hidden and disregarded
>>
>>28397681
>Eh.. doesn't mean that at all.
>
>I'd wager that these gangs wouldn't try half the shit they do at the moment without the backing of lethal weapons.

You are not going to take the weapons away though.

even if we gave up our rights and decided you were right and to try out mass gun control, there are way more guns than people in this country and plenty of them know how to make them and will hide them, then you have our open border with mexico which allows plenty of south american arms in and plenty are shipped here, we had a politician in california buying and selling from terrorists in africa and the phillipines to chinese gang members in california and I believe some on the east coast.
>>
>>28397652
a chart with cherry picked countries doesn't really mean much.
>>
>>28397696
Guns are lethal weapons and there is no need for any human being other than the armed forces and the police to own one.

>b-b-but muh hobby
Fuck off. Go and buy a model car or plane set. We're talking about saving lives faggot.
>>
>>28397706
>You are not going to take the weapons away though.
Yes we are. It might take a generation but we can and will do it.
Also it will prevent it happening in the future and shorten the total time to clean up the streets.
>>
>>28397725
(You)
>>
>>28397652
0/10

>>28397681
Maybe you're right that they wouldn't try the things they do if they did not have guns, but passing more gun laws and gun control won't prevent them from getting guns because surprise surprise, they're criminals.

Furuthermore if you were able to entirely rid the population of firearms so that these criminals didn't have any access to firearms, you would be weakening the freedom of the people to such a heinous extent things might start looking like Australia where video games are censored and freedom isn't actually free.

Robber use knives, sometimes they'll simply use their size or their superior numbers. It's simple really.
>>
>>28397725
>>28397725
>>28397725
>>28397725
have some yous, on the house
>>
>>28397714
>Cherry picked
Just some other developed western world countries breh. As similar to US as possible. Only without laws the allow ordinary citizens to carry lethal weapons with them as if they were car keys.
>>
>>28397725
NOGUNS FUCK OFF TO REDDIT
MODS BAN THIS FAGGOT
ANTI GUN SHIT ON K SHOULD BE PERMABAN
MODS WE HAVE A PROBLEM
MODS WE HAVE A PROBLEM
MODS WE HAVE A PROBLEM
>>
>>28397725

This is a pretty disingenuous argument as well, you guys should learn how to act like adults

There wouldn't be any gun problems if everybody learned to do this btw
>>
>>28397762
CONDUCTOR WE HAVE A PROBLEM
>>
>>28397725
>need

Fuck off faggot, they're a very useful way to harvest deer and remove pests such as hogs

How about we ban ice cream, donuts, and other dangerous high calorie low nutrition assault foods? Think of all the lives it would save
>>
>>28397725
>>28397742

1/10

>We're talking about saving lives!
>Take weapons away from the population but leave them in the hands of the police and others who control the population.

You know what happens when the next economic disaster hits? Another Holocaust.
>>
>>28397769
HOUSTON! WE HAVE A PROBLEM!
>>
>>28396570
it's probably because whoever does the moderation doesn't realize how heavily intertwined regulation is to collecting, shooting, using, and enjoying firearms and they think its just political shit posting. I would say go easy on them because they are just ignorant, its a pretty unique aspect of weapons that doesn't have an analog in other hobbies.
>>
>>28397757
states with practically no gun control laws have very little gun violence
states with horribly gun control laws have a substantially higher amount of gun violence.

what do you say to this?
>>
>>28397750

You are hugely overestimating the fortitude of a common criminal, the oberwhelming majority are pretty lazy and wouldn't go through the trouble of obtaining a firearm illegally
>>
>>28397704
> said the nogunz
Fuck off nigger. You're the reason /k/ is so much worse than it used to be.
>>
>>28397679
>Yeah, but you're retarded

I'm still allowed to have guns, though. :^)
>>
To anyone in this thread genuinely pro gun control I can give you a fix for the majority of gun crime without banning anything firearm related.

1: end the drug war and legalize prostitution

The drug war and illegal prostitution are HUGE money makers for gangs and as such they get into gang wars with other gangs over territory to make money in, the majority of our firearm murders are due to the ongoing turf wars to sell illegal drugs and pimp out prostituted/sex slaves

If prostitution and recreational drugs were legal legitimate companies could take it up and nobody would go to the gangs thus cripppling their income and incentive to fight eachother.

2: mass shootings

this amounts for less of the deaths but is important as it is oversaturized by the media

We need a proper mental healthcare system and we have to be able to put dangerous people away, the idea that potential violent psychopaths are able to walk the streets because you pop them full of psych pills is ludicrous.

You may not be able to stop all the crazies but you could try to stop some, this isn't like stopping an inanimate object, these are people we know are unstable.

all but one mass shooting in the past 30 years have occurred in gun free zones, branding a building as a soft target is dangerous and is a practice that should end, lots of situations are resolved by CCWs shooting madmen with guns but they never make headlines because there are no/less bodies

>>28397742
>more unregistered guns than people
>>
>>28397767
I like you and your posts.

btw I'm the British funposter
>>
>>28397794

Yeah I know, that's why I'd like to see better background checks
>>
File: 1435040139024.jpg (67 KB, 533x800) Image search: [Google]
1435040139024.jpg
67 KB, 533x800
>>28397792
Here's your (You) nogunz, let it help you in your journey to bait others!

I love nogunz, they're so cute!
>>
>>28397790
>the oberwhelming majority are pretty lazy and wouldn't go through the trouble of obtaining a firearm illegally
yes most shootings you hear about are from people that bought guns illegally.
and it's definitely very hard to give tyrone a couple bills to get you a gun from his trunk.
>>
>>28397776
I can't fucking wait

Push all the blacks and mexicans into the gas chambers
>>
>>28397790
It isn't hard to get an illegal gun, and more gun laws won't make that any harder.

Unless of course you're proposing a complete disarmament of the population. But you know where that argument goes, back to the 2nd amendment and the defense against tyranny.
>>
>>28397799
>Legalize guns!
But they kill people
>Well let's legalize prostitution and drugs too then!!!


I'm not sure if America is just one massive satirical joke. Like in the Grand Theft Auto games. I mean, are you guys ACTUALLY a parody of yourselves or are some of you really this dumb?
>>
>>28397812
0/10
>>
>>28397801

Thanks, I'm an infamous trip on /sp/, how do you even guns in Britland?
>>
>>28397826

How exactly are prostitution and drugs a bad thing?
>>
>>28397826
It's okay, you don't have to understand true freedom Muhammed.

You have never and will never experience it.
>>
>>28397831
by sucking the cock and cupping the balls of the British authorities.
>>
>>28397809
nogunz here, I buy deactivated replicas online ($1000 for a shitty handgun) and C02 powered pellet guns to fill the void
>>
>>28397842

They invented revolutions for a reason bro
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 27

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.