>>28347277
This has been beaten into the ground.

>>28347277
We all know VP9 is a shit.

I still giggle at the cocking wings. The Ruger P-Series did that(the safety/decocker doubled as cocking wings) back in the mid eighties, and H&K tries to claim it as an 'innovation'.

>>28347391
The rearmost serrations on the FN 5.7 are extended as well.

Then why was /K/ praising it like it was the hammer of Thor?

>>28347603
Two guys were doing that.

>>28347277
>Not trying to shit post

60 year old Communist pistols are better than VP9.

>>28347603
>>28347908
This. It literally was a couple faggots trying to reinvent the sebenza meme

>>28347277

I still can't believe how bad it failed in that MAC video. Jamming up after a little splash in a puddle, holy shit. Glad I never bought into the hype, shit is german garbage.

>cocking wings are bad
This is so dumb, it's an added feature you may or may not use that doesn't obstruct anything.
It doesn't make the pistol better necessarily, but it sure doesn't make it worse

>>28347277
>It's a poor man's P30

Noguns here seriously considering a VP9. P30 looks damn nice but everyone says the trigger is super-shit. :( A poor trigger sounds like a pretty big con in a handgun. I've been googling "P30 vs VP9" and the consensus seems to be that people just prefer the VP9.

All the reviewers seem to give it great marks. Are gun reviewers just untrustworthy? Would it still be a bad idea to VP9 if I never intend to expose the gun to harsh conditions?

>>28348739
I wouldn't trust my life to it.