SIG P320 or H&K VP9?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
SIG P320 or H&K VP9?
>>28324641
sig can handle mud https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZTRjXD7AVU
VP9 can't https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOu5ZGfgtVk
>>28324641
The Sig
Sig is German for fucking awesome.
HK = Jew-Rat
I put a box through both at the range to decide. I went with the P320 and spent less as a bonus.
>>28324641
Depends what for, I've shot both and own the VP9. Both are good but depends what you're using it for.
Sig master race ez decision
neither. hk p30
Пиcтoлeт "Cтpиж" pacы гocпoд здecь!
>>28324896
I don't speak or read vodka nigger. Take your moonrunes elsewhere
>>28324641
I wish I knew about the SIG P320 when I turned 21. I would have gotten it as my CCW, instead of my Glock 19.
>>28324945
how old are you
>>28324641
Glock then using the price difference buying and installing aftermarket trigger and sights.
Also, VP9 fans:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOu5ZGfgtVk
P320 compact master race
>>28324959
21 still. Birthday was in July.
>>28324796
>Both are good but depends what you're using it for.
explain yourself please.
>>28324641
P250
>>28324641
FNS9 obviously, unless you are a brand whore who has to have muh german engineering, then you want a USP or 226/228/229.
>>28325061
Is there any difference other than hammer vs striker?
>>28325048
VP9 is awesome for the range, but that's where I would draw the line. I'd actually carry the 320.
>>28325071
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOKt96CpCbo
As a VP9 owner, a Glock 19 Gen 3 is better than both.
I specifically tested both of these at the range. Loved the vp9 far more than the 320. Depressed after learning how it can't handle mud.
What handguns handle similar to the VP9?
>>28325451
Walther PPQ or HK P30.
>>28325110
>TYM
And fucking closed.
The only reason why the VP9 failed with mud is the stupid fucking baboon ass with the red dot. If HK had used a closed one it would never have failed because mud couldn't get into the striker channel.
>>28325485
Was thinking the same thing when I re watched it last night
>>28325431
Gen 3 is for faggots. Gen 4 is for straight master race.
Maybe its just me but I always thought the polymer P2XX/P3XX series of pistols look dog shit ugly. And this is coming from someone who likes Glock aesthetics.
>>28325544
Meh...I've shot both and prefer the gen 3, it had a better trigger and for whatever reason the recoil impulse felt less snappy. The gen 4 was nearly brand new though, so that might explain the difference in the trigger.
>>28325643
Nah, the Gen 4 has a little nub on the trigger bar that rubs against the slide which the Gen 3 lacks. Glock added it to prevent some sort of malfunction that I don't remember and is probably stupidly rare to encounter on the previous Gen Glocks.
>>28325574
I think the p320 compacts look nice.
Also yes, stock glocks look aesthetically pleasing
>>28324945
What's wrong with the glock 19?
I'll admit the p320 trigger is better than glock but I think I'd still choose a glock over it at least for right now. I feel it is a bit early to pick one up but the aftermarket support for it is growing.
Anyone else dislike the polymer frame of the 320 though? It looked and felt really cheap. I undestand you can easily replace them with the whole modularity thing but I dunno...
>>28325485
I've been saying this for a while and will never carry a gun with an open channel, it doesn't take a genius to figure out how dumb of am idea this is considering how strikers work
>>28325975
Yeah, considering all the lint and shit that gets on my carry guns just being IWB I avoid open channel striker guns like the plague.
>>28324943
It's a primitive google translate phrase
t. russian
P 3 2 0
3
2
0
>>28325574
P250 and P320 look awesome.
