biological weapons
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
Guys, sorry if this is a stupid question but its been bugging me for a while. Are soldiers considered biological weapons? pic not related
>>28307683
>Are soldiers considered biological weapons?
Yes.
>>28307683
>unsure if retard, bait, or honest question
Well, assuming this is an honest question, no.
"Biological weapons (often termed "bio-weapons", "biological threat agents", or "bio-agents") are living organisms or replicating entities (viruses, which are not universally considered "alive") that reproduce or replicate within their host victims."
>>28307701
So, Marines.
yeah its an honest question. Thanks for clearing that up.
The United States is not bound by the restrictions of the Geneva Convention, which we never signed, but we are bound by the restrictions of the Hague Convention.
On top of that, any NATO country openly using a material banned by NATO is inviting both repercussions on itself from the UN (which America may be above) and has opened the door for other countries to use such weapons with precedent.
So overall, unless it's some real top secret shit, the US is not pumping Agent Orange into the air anytime.
>>28308145
Your conventions are backwards
>>28307683
No but ants can be.
>>28308145
>repurcussions from the UN
Like a strongly worded letter?
>>28307683
>Are soldiers considered biological weapons?
>>28308145
>>28308221
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=084irEAQrLQ
>>28308195
NOBODY HERE IS FUCKING ANT MAN
Jesus it's just a topic
>>28307709
