So I read in Guns and Ammo that U.S. Armament is going to be producing the Colt Model 1903 again. First in .32 and then in .380s. My inner Film Noir detective is excited.
>>28294786
Looks like a Mak got knocked up by a 1911
>>28294786
Don't be, they said they will be 3-4x the cost of an original and will have a finish that looks like shit. The MSRP and photos were disappointing to say the least.
>>28294786
Which issue of G&A did you read it?
>>28294797
Maybe if you have poor eye sight.
>>28294786
The base model MSRP is said to be $1,395.
Colt's fucking high dollar pricing... Assholes.
>>28294862
Guns & Ammo HANDGUNS February/March 2016.
I know that pic related is for ants. Sorry, but its the only pic of the mag cover I could find.
Just get an original. The only good thing about this is that maybe they will make some mags that either aren't $100+ each and actually fucking work.
>>28294932
How much are originals and where can I get one?
>>28295021
I'm not sure how much they usually go for. I got my blued one at a local shop for $350 with a spare Colt magazine.
>>28295092
How does it feel to shoot? I've very curious.
>>28294797
Tok not Mak
>>28295097
They fit in the hand well and have little recoil. They are fairly accurate even with the small sights.
My only complaint is the magazine safety in my Type V.
>>28294786
Totally buying every model
>>28294932
This. I've got three of them and the cost was no where near that msrp. I'll always root for Colt, but damn they make some dumb decisions.
>>28295196
Lmao youre too poor all you have is poorfriend guns.
>>28295156
Tokamak?
>>28294786
Right, because this all worked out so well for Remington...
>>28296038
anything Remington does is a bad example
colt may be overpriced and really surviving in their name brand, but they still make good guns
>>28294786
is this going to be those special custom run officer models that are like a thousand dollars a piece and parkerized? or is it going to be a regular streamlined model?
>Make repro of popular past product
>Choose inferior finish compared to the original
>Mark it up over 2x that of an original
That was adorable.
>>28296097
They are going to be parkerized and I remember the promo pieces looking like shit.
>>28294797
>>28295092
>$350
I wish.
