This hardware here is a HK91 7.62x51 NATO beast. It chews through steel plate targets like paper.
What happened to all the unique looking weapons? All anyone makes anymore is ar15s.
>>28103198
They decided roller delayed blow-back was SO 20th century and made more modern guns.
But ar15s are a dime a dozen. Booooooring
>>28103317
That's why they made piston ar-15s.
I like hk but I really can't see myself actually buying any of their guns apart from an mp5 clone.
They're pretty based tbqh.
>>28103330
I mean, how else would they be able to ask the outrageous price for them?
I must be the only one who likes the navy trigger group better than the steel one.
>>28103198
It also, unfortunately, chews through brass, OP.
>>28103395
>implying you can't fix this
>>28103198
roller-delayed blowback proponents all got lead poisoning from all that shit they had to clean from their actions.
>>28103198
I love that paratrooper stock.
>>28103395
>implying i dont bring mine to the range for that specific reason
Mfw i see some fuddy fag swoop by to pick up my brass only to get all mad and throw it back on the ground
>>28103198
That gun looks uncomfortable as fuck.
I want one in the color scheme the mannequin is holding.
>>28103508
Can you post a picture of your used brass? And please explain it? How? Extractor tears the rim? Is the chamber fluted?
>>28103597
HK telescoping stocks are some OK, some not ok. The cheek weld is acceptable. Not sure how that buttstock is. The ones that are curved the other way feel like total shit
>>28103634
I actually rattle canned mine in about that exact pattern.
Since there is an HK91 in the OP, I'll ask here.
Century C308 or PTR-91? Is there really a measurable difference in quality?
>>28103198
That's really sexual OP.
>>28104093
>Century C308 or PTR-91? Is there really a measurable difference in quality?
Yes. Century's welds and parts used are rough, and at some point they've ground down bolt heads to artificially change bolt gap to appear in-spec, instead of timing it correctly from the start as they should have, or just using correct rollers.
>>28104117
So, typical shit CAI quality?
It was featured on the cover of the "Military Surplus" mag this month, and the author praised it to the point of shilling.
Had to figure the low price compared to a PTR was for a good reason.
>>28103343
>>28104153
They eventually improved. My c93 has a non-ground bolt.
f a m
senpai
>>28104153
If you can find a CETME/C308 that was built with a correctly timed barrel and clean, solid welds, the go for it. Check the headspace with some feeler gauges, or buy the receiver without the internals and buy HK or PTR internals afterwards.
Lot of functional C93/CETME/C308's out there that shoot fine, but Century definitely does not make it to my list of consistently good brands to willingly seek out.
i want a g3 goddamn it
>>28104251
Thanks for the input bud. Appreciate it.
>>28104302
No problem. Ask whatever other questions you have on the platform, I'll be up a while.
>>28104320
I should be asleep, but since you offered...
Do you have an opinion of the Springfield SAR8 as for how it stacks up to other offerings?
>>28104376
Cast aluminum receiver made in the US, built with imported Greek-made parts.
The Greek stuff is fine, the earlier SAR 3's are about 1:1 to the German made guns in quality and compatibility, but the SAR 8 receiver is out of spec and some report stretching after high round counts due to different materials and design used versus real steel stampings. The Federal Arms 91 is the same thing, also using a cast alum receiver.
tl;dr don't unless you want to collect, seek out a SAR-3 for $900-1100 or get a PTR.
>>28104376
Additionally if it's just a SAR 3 with an 8 overstamp, then it's going to be fine. Greek-made and imported by Springfield.
>>28103695
It isn't the fluted chamber, the flutes just leave carbon streaks down the walls. (Though people see the streaks and assume its bad) The problem is on extraction it can tear shells up pretty bad some times.
>>28103198
>g3
>unique
In
>>28105018
What does it smell like?
>>28103198
We stopped making great guns and started making cheap guns.
>>28105242
Exactly.
>>28105128
Cold steel and dead niggers.
>>28105242
I miss my old Cetme
Dad bought it for me when I was 15 or 16
I got some OD furniture from the local fudd store. Made it look like a G3. I bought a bunch of aluminum G3 magazines and filed them down to fit and feed. Sold the rifle and magazines for $800 at a gun show.
I miss that rifle. It was cool. Pictures of it are long gone, on my old high school desktop.
>>28105242
Not for long.
Assault rifles are a passing fad. The SCAR shall pave the way for the new era of battle rifles.
You'll see. You'll all see.
>>28106097
>2 Recievers
>3 in pic
>6 barrels
>7 in pic
Damn waffles can't math.
>>28103508
Fucking lol
>tfw your unit phased out Galils in favor of G3 clones
Because cumbersome and complicated rifles are the best, r-right..??
>>28106097
>passing fad
>over 50 years
>>28103198
Love em like brother.
-Falfag
>>28106495
>50 years
>major in regards to the evolution of firearms
baka desu senpai
>>28103198
>All anyone makes anymore is ar15s.
Because of all the import bans.
The media gets to demonize ar15s because it's all we've been left.
>>28103508
>my face when a fudd got tossed on his ass for routinely crossing the yellow line reaching for brass during live fire
Both the rangemaster and the guy are in their 70s. They didn't ban him though unfortunately.
>>28104088
any more uploads oklabro?
>>28106554
The "fad" has lasted over 50 years and isn't showing any sign of going away, and there's no sign of anyone re-adopting battle rifles. 5.56 is going last a few more decades before we move to something even smaller. Stay mad, 308fags
>>28103198
>chews through steel plate targets like paper
No it doesn't
>>28103508
I feel blessed that I have never experienced this at my range.
