In places with a 10 round maximum mag are belt fed weapons a grey area?
Well fuck, now I'm interested.
Colorado 15 rounder reporting in.
No.
A belt is considered a magazine by the law. More than 10 rounds is verboten. The only exception to (new) 10 round magazine sizes I know of are for tube, fixed .22LR magazines.
>>27950067
Probly depends on the state.
>It's not a magazine, it's a belt!
I honestly want to see what happens
>>27950088
If a shoestring can be a machine gun or a flare can be a grenade then a belt can be a magazine.
>>27950067
OMG me gusta, imagine having one of these with a lighting link or better yet a AR-10. Its the kind of thing Farcry dreams are made of.
>>27950102
>shoestring can be a machine gun
Shoestring does change how the gun functions internally
> flare can be a grenade
You can pop off 37mm flares all you want without it being a DD or paying a $200 tax
>>27950067
In canada yea, as long as it's for a belt fed design made before 1945, so technically, if someone where to make a brand new semi auto only Dshk reciever we could have Dshks with 50-100rd belts of 12.7mm. Already can have m2s and mg34s and 1919s
>>27950081
Go to a gun show and buy a rebuild kit. Problem solved. Just don't assemble it into a working magazine though, of course.
>>27950118
The point was that the ATF doesn't base their definitions off of what the words actually mean, but rather what they want them to mean.
You can shove a road flare up your ass with a shoestring tied to the end without turning your rectum into an AOW, but that doesn't make my point any less valid.
Just don't get caught.
>>27950159
Not in glorious kekfornia, mag rebuild kits are banned here. Now individual mag parts, that im not too sure.
According to new york law it's still a "high capacity feeding device"
HOWEVER, it wouldn't be an assault weapon
> a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least one of the following characteristics .....
>detachable magazine
http://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article265.htm
