What vehicle in human history has pecked the most firepower?
Been thinking either the ac-130 or a battleship. Submarine with nuclear missiles is just a party killer.
>>27800007
The SS-18 Satan loaded with a 25mt warhead
A single project pluto
>>27800007
Kirov class maybe?
Probably this thing.
>>27800162
/thread
>>27800162
>Hornets and Prowlers payload
Wow it's fucking nothing
Fully loaded Ohio class with tomahawk loadout.
>>27800162
Can a propeller aircraft actually take off from a carrier?
>>27800451
They wouldn't put them on there if they couldn't
>>27800451
No, those are just for decoration.
>>27800007
How did a c-130 make your vehicles list when you also noted a battleship, which is obviously larger... and outdated as well.
>>27800093
>>27800188
Arguably not. I mean, sure a nuke is a lot of boom but you really can't use those things tactically without killing yourself. So if an SSBM is under attack from attack subs those city killers are pretty much dead weight.
>>27800451
Are you retarded?
>>27800451
Literally what?
What makes you think they can't, they've been doing it since WW2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JehK9I20bqE&ab_channel=reztoc
>>27800451
prop jet set up on the slingshot for launch..
>can it take off?
![amx30-pluton-74ra-1980-75295f[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ysfw9pU.jpg "amx30-pluton-74ra-1980-75295f[1].jpg")
>>27800499
>tactical nukes don't exist.
You're really sure about that?
>>27800007
The modified Tu-95 that carried the Tsar Bomba, I'd say.
>>27800181
>70 Rhinos
>Capable of carrying damn near anything able to be stuck onto an aircraft, including nukes
>Can strike thousands of nm's away
>Carriers practically made battleships obsolete
>"Nothing"
Naw boss, that's straight fucking dakka.
>nukes are party killers
>nuke thread
