Why is the P320 so ugly? I mean, exceptionally so for a polymer pistol. It's got the design of a metal-framed pistol that would need to incorporate a hammer spring in the backstrap despite it being striker fired.
>>27551296
The grip angle mostly. Also just a shitty low bore axis grip
>>27551296
grip angle
>>27551316
lore bore axis? it looks like it has the normal sig high bore.
>P320 vs Glock
>Sig is ugly
2/10, i replied.
>>27551398
sig fanboy go home
I'll take hand gats that's actually ergonomic for 500
>muh glawk purrrfeckion
Fuck off glockfag. And I don't even like sigs.
>>27551471
>implying the sig is ergonomic
and i'm not even a glockfag. M&P 4 lyfe nigga
>>27551296
To each his own, I guess. I can't shoot glocks. It feels like I'm groping a chalkboard eraser.
I didn't buy my p320 based on looks, but because When I picked it up at my LGS it locked into my hand like a goddamn lego piece. Everything about it is perfect for the way that I shoot, from the grip angle and dimensions, the trigger, even the slightly forward balance of mass. I'll probably be buying one of each x-change kit for it in compact/medium for just that reason.
>tfw I can have perfect retention and ergos and shoot as many different calibers as Sig will support.
>>27551512
Okay. Fine. I'm an m&p fag my self. 327 and 9fs. I just hate glocks and glockfags so I was stepping up for the Sig. But only because I held it and liked it.
>>27551296
The compact looks nice.
>>27551296
>argues that Sigs are ugly
>picks the ugliest Glock I have ever seen as comparison
Yeah okay
