Kurdish female soldiers are getting their asses kicked by ISIS...literally.
http://imgur.com/a/VZp4l
>people involved in combat are killed something
Stop the presses
1. who cares
2. why is this a thread
Fuck
>>23036370
Looks like a little bit of rape was involved. kek
Only the Kurdish female soldiers?
You literally do not understand how to use the word literally.
>>23036385
Especially the female soldiers. It's been long proven that women can't into war for shit.
>>23036337
>combat zone
>sandals
10/10 opurater
"women warriors"
top fucking kek
>this thread
so much fedora in this thread it hurts.
>literally
I see no feet connecting to asses.
>>23036337
fuck off, this thread gets started multiple times a month.
Fuck off muslim faggot
>>23036337
Not even the same girl.
>>23036411
Why?
Not a female, feminist or any other bullshit, just curious.
I get why you shouldn't mixed them with male soldiers, but what's wrong with women squads?
>>23036482
yes, putting women on the frontlines in a real war against horny, angry young men
what could possibly go wrong?
>>23036482
They simply do not have bodies that can handle war the same way men can. In greater numbers they have a chance, but one on one they get rekt every time.
>>23036411
>women can't into war for shit.
I get more fragile, I get less strong, I get "can't pull wounded friends along"
But why else? What other vital things do they lack? Are they bigger targets or worse reflexes or lack the nerve and guts or what?
>>23036496
They can either get killed or captured and tortured/raped, which also happen to men minus the rape part.
>>23036504
>bodies
We have guns now.
It doesn't matter if the shot comes from a 100 kg or 40 kg woman, the hole is the same size
>>23036522
Nigger, infantry work is essentially marathon running but with heavy packs and some heavy lifting along the way.
That's pretty funny. ITT: butt ravaged white knights.
Who gives a fuck what they do to eachother? Let em tear eachother to pieces.
>>23036504
in a firefight? I see less strong but hand to hand combat isn't much of war anymore as far as I know. But going pew-pew-pew at each other, I fail to see why a woman would be at a significant disadvantage. Hell, they'd be smaller targets, right? Assuming that even matters at all.
>>23036482
Not that guy but I think females should have a different roles when it comes to war. They should focus on giving them light armor and light guns so they can run fast and do shit fast. With that and their size, they'd be freaking perfect for sneaking and stuff.
>>23036375
>/k/
>shitting on women in combat
>take a guess
>>23036337
she had nice tits tho
You can fake turkey
>>23036522
>It doesn't matter if the shot comes from a 100 kg or 40 kg woman, the hole is the same size
No guns please leave.
>>23036522
confirmed completely utterly ignorant about soldiering
>>23036536
So don't make them do infantry work?
casualties of war, anyone who sends women into war accepts this possible outcome.
>>23036559
That's what /k/ has been saying.
Don't put wimminz in combat arms. For a variety of valid, extremely relevant reasons.
>>23036550
>thinking war is team fortress 2
>>23036571
I agree with frontlines, I don't agree with
> It's been long proven that women can't into war for shit.
>>23036536
What is it that is so heavy? Shouldn't a few MREs, a gun, and like 12 clips of ammo not weight much more than 100 pounds? Plus whatever else they carry. I just never understood pic related type stuff, isn't it the army's job to supply their soldiers? Won't soldiers weighed down by tons of gear move slower and be easier targets as well?
>>23036546
because they are a pain in the ass to deal with, you can't yell at them without a bunch of crying and they are a big distraction to all the horny guys that have jobs to do instead of playing grab ass with the females.
>>23036581
They can't into the central part of war, which is killing niggas.
This is because basically every form of warfare since like 1000 BC involves carrying large loads of crap and depends on physical strength and stamina.
>>23036591
>clips
Its been long proven that girls can be good snipers.
>>23036591
>clips
To answer your question, they're carrying body armor, like 30 pounds of 5.56, batteries for all of their shit, probably some extra belts of ammo for the SAW gunner.
More shit*more distance=More combat effectiveness.
>durr womyn should be allowed in combat
Anybody who says this has never had any experience soldiering. Particularly in a real army.
>>23036608
lovely rifle
>>23036591
yes. thats why generally weaker smaller female soldiers would be less than ideal
>>23036591
oh you're trolling
haha, i wasn't mad but you got me either way
>>23036621
except 90% of the time the people who say women can't be soldiers are male soldiers
:^)
>>23036627
It is.
>>23036644
Thus playing into what I'm saying
>>23036605
>>23036609
I am sorry. I watch too much TV
That sounds pretty fair.
>>23036629
I'm not trolling I just don't know the answer, thus I'm asking. I understand it might be a stupid question but that's why I ask on /k/ anonymously where it doesn't matter
>>23036651
what model is it?
>tfw put 3rd pic in fap folder because of how awesome her tits are
>>23036678
She's much too young to be a model anon.
>>23036644
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2512412/Female-RAF-recruits-100-000-compensation--march-like-men.html
>>23036656
welp, my bad. I read your post wrong.
>>23036651
is that your daughter anon?
