>>27932702
What are they going to do? bomb more stuff, kill more civilians and fail just like Afghanistan?

This shit wouldn't happen if the western nations just mind their own business, but they'll never learn.

File: nato.jpg (42 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]

42 KB, 640x480

NATO is meeting because France wants to start war with ISIS....ISIS is not a country so NATO is looking at Syria.... IF Russia does not agree there my be WW3..... Whats your thoughts

Was thinking of starting a thread about this myself actually, since while relatively speaking 9/11 was still worse, this is still a horrendous attack against innocent French citizens, and invoking Article 5 wouldn't be out of the question.

Though after doing a quick google search on the subject earlier, it doesn't seem all that likely to happen (and apparently not necessary either).

http://ipolitics.ca/2015/11/17/france-wont-invoke-natos-article-5-the-reason-is-russia/
>inb4 ipolitics are shit, I don't usually get my news from online
I'm very lucky to have an excellent independently owned newspaper in my city, with a centrist political bias.

I see what he is saying but france is saying that isis created an act of war....if france declairs war then all contrys in NATO will have to join ***sorry for my crappy spelling***

>>27932731
What are they going to do? bomb more stuff, kill more civilians and fail just like Afghanistan?

Works for me

>>27932732
Doubtful.
Also
>North Atlantic
>Turkey
kek

If we start bombing country's then there alliances will start a war......

I thought France withdrew from NATO in the 60s?

dont know much but here is a link to NATOs website on this toppic

http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2015/ISIL/Russia-Syria-Putin-ISIL-Chechnya-Middle-East/EN/index.htm

>>27932816
They rejoined later on.

>>27932847
After the Cold War was safely over, yes.