>"During the maiden arrival of RFS Admiral Grigorovich at Sevastopol June 9th, hull was damaged during berthing."
Russians in charge of docking.
>>30233783
Could be worse.
UK ships damage themselves in warm water.
>http://www.janes.com/article/61089/inquiry-reveals-uk-s-type-45-destroyers-are-even-less-reliable-in-warm-water
>>30233783
Sergey, prepare the ropes!
>>30234302
Not the fault of Brits.
Sea was too warm, Israelis mistake.
Not a resident of California (but of a shitty commie state). Give it to me straight doc, how fucked are we? Between the use of a law from 1299 england, to the ATF refusing kitchen counter FFLs (after a certain president said he was going to stop this gun grabbing shit) and an empty swing vote on the SCOTUS with several more to retire and 4 members specifically saying they don't believe people have the right to bear arms...
What I am saying is that if words no longer have meaning and courts can just literally fucking cite laws from other nations, how fucked are we?
>>30233746
Completely. Until they pass some really onerous shit and then try to enforce it with the mailed fist. Why?
>>30233746
Hi MDfag, where you from?
>>30233823
DPRNJ
Why are the japanese such a giant cucks and faggots when it comes to gun ownership.
In japan it is almost impossible to own a gun even less carry it with you for self defense, regardless of crime you do have a natural right to bear arms.
So i am wondering, why there is no movement of japanese people or any relevant political party lobying for making better gun laws?
Why are japs such cucks?
>>30233731
because Douglas MacArthur didn't want to have to wreck their shit again
>>30233731
because they arent a bunch of americans who need guns
Control of weapons and control of the populace is an ancient concept in Japan. They have been through so many civil wars and uprisings that they decided that ditching freedom for stability as being the better choice.
What did you do /k/ related today?
Shot 200 rounds through this and then cleaned it
dumping dirty to clean pics
Made a $5 91/30 bayonet fit on my M 38
So should I get a surplus original or reproduction Soviet Panama hat? Where should I get it? Who has the best ones?
>>30233333
Why are you such a fucking faggot?
>>30233343
>Why can't I post unrelated things on this board?
http://breakingdefense.com/2016/06/navy-pushed-too-hard-too-fast-to-get-lcs-frigate-gao/
Time to finally pull the plug, eh?
By (((Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.)))
>>30232986
for fucks sake mikhail we get it you hate america go drink some cologne or something
I think they already pulled the plug when they decided to cut the orders and explore a proper frigate replacement
can your wife protect you from a B&E?
Nope.
Also,
>/K/
>wife
LOL
>>30232985
No, it's a shitty jpeg with some malware from a pornsite.
>>30233076
filename related
Which one of you guys did this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGbE0L2zWbc
>>30232889
/a/ or /mlp/
>>30232889
Yelp. Sorry bud. Couldn't hep muhsef.
>>30232889
this was circa 2011 on the light rail in Tempe, Arizona. its old as fuck
>Watch 13 hours
>This is how Delta is portrayed
So how accurate is this?
>>30232873
>literally who's with piston shitter ars and condor chest plates that never get any meaningful screen time
bout sums it up quite accurately
guy on the right looks like standard CIA
kinda hard to tell without a blue polo shirt
>>30232873
These dudes look like my redneck uncles hunting buddies.
I have a question, I recall reading that when an F-22/F-35 fires up their radar actively, no passive radar can pick up the radiation. Is this true? Or can a passive radar detect a radiating F-22/F-35?
>>30232836
That sounds like a dubious claim. Signals are signals. You can't detect something with a signal that can't be detected
>>30232836
of course it can. the trick is that the radar stays on 1 frequency for a very short period of time before randomly jumping to another one. most RWRs aren't sensitive enough to detect it
>>30232836
What the others said; the F-22 / F-35 can use LPI (Low Probability of Intercept) modes which reduce the chances of a passive radar / RWR identifying their emissions, but like stealth in general, it doesn't make you completely invisible.
I'm in the market for a 1911. My options are either Ruger SR1911 or Springfield 1911a1. Which is the better firearm? A Remington R1 is also another option
>>30232780
spungfeld better gun
ruger still good and cheaper
>>30232780
I own a Ruger SR1911. It has been perfect so far. Nothing particularly special about it but it is an excellent value as far as stainless 1911s are concerned.
I have zero experience with the Springfield.
>>30232802
this desu senpai
So I bought a new wasr 10 and the furniture that century is putting on the new wasr is absolutely terrible. I put like 300 rounds through it and the but stock cracked and fell off. What the fuck kind of wood are they using? Feel like cedar or a cheap pine. Is Berch wood really that expensive they can't make a stock set out of decent quality wood?
>>30232648
>the AK, where after 300 rounds, even the wood starts to break
>>30232651
I ended up replacing the cheap shitty wood with a surplus ak74 stock set that I got from apex for $50.
keep the hood safe, H
https://youtu.be/med677Ewmmo
>>30232600
Keep the hood safe, H
>>30232600
keep the hood safe, H
>>30232600
keep the hood safe, H
Well, /k/, I see they are selling XD's for $399 right now. Should I buy one and get rid of my current SD9VE? Or, should I just keep my SD9VE?
https://www.classicfirearms.com/springfield-xd-9-full-mod-2-9mm-blk-xdg9101hcsp
>>30232550
that's a good trade
>>30232550
An XD is better than an SD9VE. Both are worse than a Glock or M&P though.
If you like the XD line sure, buy one. Still wouldn't sell the SD9VE though. Two guns are better than one and of you really want to sell, at least wait and see how the election goes
Is there some unwritten rule that if you have a mustache, you also have to own a revolver?
>>30232538
Yes. Just like the unwritten rule that your a faggot for posting really stupid shit.
>>30232538
I have eleven revolvers but no mustache. what does that make me?
>>30232538
Rule 1: those in mustache revolver club don't talk about mustache revolver club.