After many years passed we can finally agree that Aya being a slut is a stupid meme and is NOT true.
Of course, ZUN created all Touhous to be pure.
Aya was slut before Sanae was
Neither of them are real sluts though
Worst tengu
>>15184490
Of course she isn't.
The real question is this: Who will be the next slut after Sanae?
>>15184560
You
>>15184560
Wasn't it Sakuya?
>>15184517
Nobody claims themselves to be honest
>>15184560
Hecatia?
>>15184412
But some are purer than othes.
Like these two, they are probably two of the cutest 2hu's and I only want to hug them and kill those who harm them.
But Koakuma would obviously be more sexual as she is a succubus.
Allthough now I think about it, it would be insanely cute if she had her succubus instincts, but was too shy to actually do anything.
>>15184588
Sakuya has pathetic woman body. She's not going to be desirable.
>>15184588
Sakuslut
>>15184560
None.
Sanae is the true and only slut.
>>15184588
>>15184918
Sanae fags pls
Being sex-positive doesn't make someone a slut.
2hu slut legacy:
EosD - Sakuya
PCB - Sakuya
IN - Reisen
PFV - Aya
MF - Sanae
SA - Sanae
UFO Sanae
TD - Youmu
DDC - Sakuya
LoLK - Sanae
Honorary Sluts
IaMP - Suika
SB - Aya
SWR - Tenshi
Hsk - Meiling, Cirno, Sanae
DS - Hatate
FW - Cirno and the slut fairy team
HM - Kokoro
ISC - Seija
ULiL - Sumirenko
Print sluts
WaHH - Kasen
>>15185159
I don't see a single Reimu and she's a fucking dirty slut who knows hundreds of men.
My Sanae? A slut? Don't be idiots.
No 2hu is a slut. Some just appear more than others, is all. Doesn't make 'em sluts.
>>15185189
>>15185183
Is needed to do more than simply fuck a little bunch of men if you want to win the title of THE slut.
>>15184714
>But Koakuma would obviously be more sexual as she is a succubus.
No.
>>15184376
I'll take either Aya.
>>15184376
she's an eccentric but refined old lady now. her slutty days were long past. doesn't mean that she's anything close to pure!
>>15185501
I like her because she's probably the most youkai-like youkai in the setting.
She knows how Gensokyo works and plays into it. If your existence depends on (mis)information, a newspaper writer is a powerful thing to be.
>>15185129
>sex-positive
Literally a euphemism for being a huge slut.
>>15185712
Why is Eiki so short?
>>15185712
You have a very poor understanding of journalism, Eiki. If you don't make a story interesting, nobody reads it.
>>15185712
The funny thing is that canonically she doesn't seem to twist much at all outside of her personal comments. ZUN pretty much writes it so that everyone is skewing the story in some little way.
>>15185766
Because loli
>>15185189
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LRjijCTKaM
>>15194549
Everytime this plays on the playlist, I get sad and stop doing what I was currently doing.
>>15194560
Here, this will cheer you up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9hagVL-__c
>>15194638
>>15194638
This song ruined the sad ending for me. The "Oooooooooohh, there's a hole inside my boooooooooat!" bits made me laugh so hard.
>>15194560
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pgyttbTccQ
Why on Earth would anyone like Aya? She is a colossal gossip, extremely opinionated and her newspaper articles are universally panned.
>>15201499
I bet she fucks like a champ
>>15201499
>She is a colossal gossip, extremely opinionated and her newspaper articles are universally panned.
Citation needed.
>>15201499
She's cute.
>>15206561
This, that's all that matters.
>>15201499
What would she write about Donald J. Trump?
>>15184376
>pic related
wtf leg
What's the problem with sluts?
They can only cheat on people who have a actually been in a relationship, so they might as be the pinnacle of purity for jaypee.
>>15189946
How?
>>15207047
Intentionally done.
>>15185183
What's wrong with her mouth?
>>15184437
Okay, I have tried Sad Panda tags for the last two hours.
May I gave the source?
>>15208592
Do as you wish. Nobody is the boss of you here.
>>15208627
10/10
>>15208592
it's lunatic udon
>>15184376
Can't spell Shameimaru without shame
>>15208731
No shame, Aya is beautiful
Aya has had more cocks than you breaths.
Aya is more than 1000 years old. I can't see her being a virgin for THAT long.
>>15208875
> I can't see her being a virgin for THAT long.
I could see /jp/ being a virgin that long
>>15208864
>Aya has had more cocks than you breaths.
Wow such an original and intelligent post, congrats man wow, just wow. Amazing.
>>15208745
Kourindou Tengu Outfit Aya is best Aya
>>15201499
Fuck off Hataters
Reisen is now confirmed for the new Touhou slut.
>>15209525
Useless rabbit.
Only good for her sex appeal.
Aya is the cutest slut in Gensokyo! I wish real hookers were that cute!
>>15210391
I want to slut shame Aya!
Best type of Aya is the one where she knows what she is doing
>>15184679
>reporter
as someone with a journalism degree, trust me bro, that's the lie to tell
>>15210699
So journalists are professional liars?
>>15210391
I bet Aya would film herself experiencing anal sex for the first time and deliberately leak the video, making it seem like it was stolen by some nasty youkai. All this would increase interest and demand for Bunbunmaru and she'd reap the rewards.
>>15210711
Well the Obama White House just said the average age of a journalist is 27 and they know absolutely nothing, only what the administration wants them to say.
>>15210711
>So journalists are professional liars?
Lemme put it this way: journalists routinely rank below used car salesmen in "trustworthiness" surveys. And for a good god-damned reason. Nobody does journalism for the money because it pays nothing. They're almost all idealists out to save the world. You put a bunch of idealists into the same newsroom together... well, you get bias. Boy, do you get bias.
And remember; once upon a time the entire nation tuned in to listen to Walter Cronkite. Media personalities have oft bemoaned that the USA no longer gets their news from One, True Source (who can carefully control the message.) The horrors! Journalists also have a hefty superiority complex (the former CBS guy who wrote the book "Bias" followed it up with a book called "Arrogance," to illustrate) and tend to see themselves as Protectors Of The Free World, charged By God Almighty to protect us from The Demons.
And that attitude shines through, trust me. People notice.
What ever happened to that Aya tripfag who quit /jp/ because he was so obsessed with her it was messing up his life?
Aya is neat because she's a throwback to an older era of journalism, where the journalists were more honest about being dishonest, and when shit was just more hardcore across the board.
For instance: on the eve of the Civil War, there were anti-abolitionist riots in New York (people were angry at abolitionists, identifying them as the cause of the war everyone knew was likely to break out.) The mobs smashed up Greely's Tribune (a well-known abolitionist paper,) then turned to cross the street and trash the offices of the New York Times.
Now, we all know the modern New York Times. It is literally the gold standard of left-wing activism and editorializing in the news section - only the LA Times can seriously give it a run for its money. According to their editorials and news coverage, Guns are the Great Satan killing America, and they should all be banned.
Well, folks, the New York Times of the 1800s was a different beast. Very different. For as the mobs surged into the Times's lobby, they were met with the sight of *three fucking gatling guns* the editor had wisely purchased a few days prior.
>>15210871
>where the journalists were more honest about being dishonest
You mean when they started wars and got thousands of people killed?
>>15210890
>You mean when they started wars and got thousands of people killed?
You mean like this? http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/cronkites-vietnam-blunder-7185
And remember, back then they saw yellow presses much as we do today. They weren't considered very trustworthy or believable. They were literally the era's equivalent of the Daily Mail, "tabloid" newspapers - the worst ones were literally the 19th century version of Huffington Post, to put things in perspective. Here's a political cartoon from the era:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/98/Independence_Seaport_Museum_224.JPG
The strange thing is that the entire idea of "unbiased journalism" is a relatively recent, and almost entirely American invention. For most of history - and American history - newspapers and journalists felt no higher calling to be unbiased arbiters of the Truth. The protections provided for the Free Press in the Constitution were formulated in this environment; the idea being that no one group should be privileged to tell their lies without others out there contesting and countering them. People understood this, and would compare news sources to sniff out the bullshit, and took everything with a few grains of salt. And certain newspapers made a reputation out of not being full of shit, a reputation they had to strive to maintain, because people were inclined to distrust.
I've actually seen journalists arguing that we should go back to this model; that journalists should abandon the "unbiased reporting" principle and just actively advocate for whatever political change they feel is right (the example given was "Obama silent on light rail development.") This was an article written by a prominent modern journalist; I saw it on my class syllabus for a level 400 journalism class.
I canceled the class in the first week and re-scheduled.
I think things were better back then, simply because the media was more skeptical of itself. Even after the idea of unbiased, objective journalism was formed and took hold, they were still close enough to the preceding era to know that everyone is inherently biased, and there's not much you can do about that except being diligent about checking others, and getting others to check you in turn. And university educations were far less common back then; journalists were almost always local and could spring up from any walk of life. And it wasn't that hard to find people who knew how to write - America was a surprisingly literate nation. There's been articles and such on this; even Tocqueville observed it. Americans had something like a 90% literacy rate, literally everyone read often, and the main means of communication with distant friends (i.e. 40 miles away or more) was letters. So "being able to write" wasn't synonymous with "college education." So newsrooms were a lot more diverse. And that didn't make them bad reporters, either. I've even seen modern journalists suggesting that a bachelors degree in journalism is a waste of time - you should get a degree in history, or economics, or whatever topic you hope to report on, and then learn the nuts and bolts of journalistic writing technique on-the-job or at a postgrad journalism school.
In our modern era, though, journalists almost all have similar motivations (Save The World,) go through college together (where they're exposed to a mostly homogeneous ideology from staff and/or the mostly homogeneous populace of idealistic energetic 20-something students,) and then they all walk into a newsroom together.
You add this to the modern conception of objective journalism, i.e. "We Are Above The Bias, We Are The Guardians Of The Free World, On A Holy Quest To Protect All," and you can see where media bias comes from. Sure, collusion and deliberate lies exist, but for the most part it's just a product of who journalists are; a product of some of their best qualities, in fact.
Goldberg's book "Bias" offers a real fascinating look at it. Bernard Goldberg was a CBS reporter, correspondent, and even hosted two big CBS documentaries. He's got twelve Emmy awards. He's big-time. He pissed off his colleges when he wrote an op-ed (IIRC it ran in the Post) criticizing CBS for what he felt amounted to a hit-piece on Ross Perot, suggesting that using words like "wacky" to describe Perot's flat-tax proposals was not very unbiased. He got some letters of support and thank-you (which he published in his book without the signature attached,) but he also got a personal phone call from Dan Rather himself. Rather was emotional; he told Bernie he was a *patriot,* he loved his country, etc. Rather considered the accusation of being biased to be tantamount to being labeled a traitor.
Journalists take their responsibility seriously, but they often combine it with an inability to understand that bias is endemic to human beings, and that even the best and brightest can't self-police their own, no matter how hard they try. They view it as a great sin that they are innocent of, not a cognitive blind spot that they should work with others to address. And we all know how that turned out for Dan Rather.
What if Aya was fat?
>>15211017
For some reason Aya never struck me as a 2hu that'd work like that. Some touhous just do work with thicker body types, but it just doesn't seem to fit Aya. She's hyperactive and flighty and The Fastest, after all.
>>15211017
I'd still be into her. Aya is love, Aya gives life.
>>15211226
Aya is also sexual as HELL.
>>15211017
Then I'd call her a fat slut!
I want to cum inside Aya
>>15211017
Birds get fat if they can't fly. She should have been drawn with wings.
>>15216360
Knowing that artist they probably got torn off.
>>15211226
>Aya gives life
Lewd as heck.
>>15211017
>What if Aya was fat?
Fat is utterly gross and disgusting.
>>15208864
one more then won't do her any harm
>>15208731
I'd like to imagine that she was so giddy to take a picture that she managed to do that to herself.
>>15210831
Thanks for the thought-out reply.
>>15210831
Putting your hyperbolic opinion of journalists aside, you also fail to address the alternative - state run media. I'd gladly suffer the existence of hacks, clickbaiters and tabloids for the sake of there also being good reporting and investigation out there, which there is. People dismiss journalists because it makes them feel good about being apathetic, incurious, and ignorant.
>>15211017
roast this turkey
