I've had people judge this but I wanna know what you guys think of my art. It took me a long time to make
It's pointilism by the way
>>2535351
it's not
Are you a furry by chance? they have a weird fascination with this movie.
>>2535351
its not pointillism but I like the fox and the hound so I like it
>>2535349
>It took me a long time to make
this means nothing.
i like to take a long time taking a shit, does not mean its a better shit than any other.
its shit op.
>>2535349
You're not trolling, are you?
Pointillism? Haha! If this is pointillism, them drawing-by-numbers is cubism, right?
If this is art, you're either some waaaay-out-there pop-art-trash genius or maybe just a hobbyist who paints cartoony atrocities.
Either way, it would have something without the rawful cartoon figures.
It's trashy at best.
>>2535504
Given they're furries, it's not weird at all.
>>2535647
If they were furries, they'd have oversized dicks and tits.
Looks like something a serial killer would do in prison
>>2535693
Haha! You win this thread.
>>2536144
What's rude in my post. It's an honest art critique. If you can't take it, don't expose yourself. Some people here actually know a bit about art and it's unusual not to say things straight as they are.
I even also made a constructive remark.
>>2535349
Good Job man. We can tell this took a lot of time and its great to invest a lot of effort into your work, but I dont know if asking for feedback on 4chan is a good idea.
If you are proud of the piece and you like it then that should be enough. You should never seek approval from the neck-beards. It will only tear you down and demotivate you.
>>2536144
Yeah well...
sorry for being a dick. Good effort indeed.
By normal standards it's pretty good.
By a little higher standard it's oookay.
By a even little higher standard it needs some work but has potencial if redone with more details/shadows/use of different colors.
Keep up the work
>>2537543
>By a even little higher standard it needs some work
Pic related. (Franz Marc)
