https://deepart.io
Artists are now obsolete. Discuss.
>Thank you for submitting your images. Since processing takes few minutes and we have a long queue of images it may take a while till your image is ready. As soon as it is ready we will send you an e-mail. Feel free to submit other pictures.
how long does this take op?
>>2494456
oh
>8755 minutes
fuck this, there's literally people editing images together in photoshop, that's still art creating or photobashing
It doesn't take long, it's just trying to scare you into paying. I had mine in like 6 hours
>>2494451
Photobasher and contemporary 2deep4u artists are. Nothing new though, they were always obsolete.
>>2494464
post it. this seems like a scam.
the timer on mine is literally going up
>>2494451
I now want an illustration of a 50-foot tall dragon robot fighting an 8-armed spider amazon princess on top of a flying aircraft carrier and I need it in 40 minutes
>>2494451
>deepart.io
again? just saying, these people are charging for use an open software, that you could install at home for free, if you have a not-so-old GPU
if you have an old PC, another alternative, which uses the VERY SAME algorithm, much faster, and with no cost at all, is:
https://dreamscopeapp.com/
its fun, but it will in no way replace anything that your computer was not capable of doing before.
Played around with it a few weeks ago. It's hit or miss(I didn't include some other the uglier images it spit out), but it is a pretty cool toy. That's all it really is as of yet though, a toy.
>>2494451
if anyone's feels like experimenting, here's a easy way to do this very same shit at home for FREE:
http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/create-neural-paintings-deepstyle-ubuntu/
>>2494671
This was my favorite of the bunch.
>>2494673
Neat.
stop with these threads. No, they are not and never will be. It's one of the hardest jobs to ever replace with a machine.
>>2494451
yeah, just like how the camera rendered artists obsolete, huh?
>>2494481
Go draw some more high school level anime pictures you autistic fuck.
>>2494451
Well, digitalfags were always obsolete, falling for cintiq epic mene.
>>2494521
It's on my computer and I'm on my phone and it sucked anyways and I just don't feel like it.
>>2494688
>hardest jobs to ever replace with a machine.
Actually, i think like 70% of art's place in commerce and entertainment/media will be replaced by this, bucause they don't need nuance or wonderful color work, just "gimme a penguin in van gogh style". Portraiture and other original fine art will never be replaceable though, at least until machines are indistinguishable from humans.
>>2497139
yeah but the "van gogh style" has to come from somewhere. computational creativity is still very very far in its infancy
it begins
>>2497167
Good taste desu
>>2494451
i'm affraid
>>2497167
>over 9000 minutes
>thumbnail size
>big ass logo
is the word "cuck" filtered on this board?
Someone do Beksinski
>>2497184
dpnt worry bby i b there 4 u
>>2494673
Has anyone just gone and uploaded Docker setup for this, or better yet, a VirtualBox disc?
I can't be fucked doing all of this manually.
https://deepart-io.s3.amazonaws.com/content/WMskyomORQunwxUvVKDBIitSZ.jpg
+
https://deepart-io.s3.amazonaws.com/style/GOzkuxrBeYlUHVNdLSgTZwcIJ.jpg
=
https://deepart-io.s3.amazonaws.com/cache/ec/b5/ecb5920ba7447d040613e35fa914d6e9.jpg
>>2497139
>commercial art is all "gimme a penguin in van gogh style"
Lolno. The penguin needs to be in a specific pose and angle, doing a specific thing in a specific environment with specific lighting. Also in many cases the machine would have to be able to come up with the idea of the penguin on its own. On top of that the asset needs to be produced fast and you may need to iterate several variations of it.
Portrait art is one of the few things this deep ai can already do fairly decently, since most portrait art is just paint this guy and make it look nice, with very few specific needs or demands outside of that. The portrait stands as a work of its own instead of having to work in the context of a larger product.
Since the results from the deep ai are very unpredictable and hard to control I don't see it being very useful in an industrial setting.
>>2494451
Artists have always been worthless.
>wait for 4 days
>page 404's
>no email
>nothing
fuck you
It was cool at first but once you see enough of them you can start to pick out the nuances that make it a deepart result. The human brain is itself a very powerful pattern recognizer. I think its more interesting if used as a tool for backgrounds or as a starting point to edit and refine further, a lot of the results look fucking weird but if the creation process didn't just end at the 'lol here's the result' you could get some good looking pieces.
I want to see this applied to animation.
>>2494521
Different anon, but the timers for mine haven't been terribly accurate either. This one was at least 5 hours faster than indicated, but most definitely not 6 hours in total. I did have several processing images up at once that time. Might be an estimate based on server load or whatever.
>>2498260
Also, it 'only' took 3000 minutes a few months ago, so I'm gonna go with "yes".
I wonder if it becomes more custom looking if you repeatedly recycle results as new image input.
