ITT: Professional drawings/artists that if posted out of context on /ic/ would garner nothing but "NEEDS MORE LOOMIS" responses.
>>2490615
real dumb thread op
>>2490615
>ITT: bagbosse
>>2490615
im pretty sure u dont understand the concept of /ic/
That book was so fucking magical to me as a kid and I'm thankful every day that I never got carried away and accidentally poisoned someone.
Anyway, those illustrations are great and it sounds like you might just be a butthurt 'muh style'fag who doesn't understand the difference between an active pursuit of style, and compensation for a lack of skill.
Honestly, I don't think I've ever even seen something in the vein of the OP illustration posted in /ic/. It's not the right place to crit stuff like that, and anyone producing such art probably understands that.
Added to that, there are absolutely professional illustrators who kinda suck.
>>2490615
This brings back memories