literally loomis
>>2436624
Draw from life, and apply Loomis.
not his problem if you're too stupid to understand it
that said, most of his books aren't for the absolute beginner
>>2436624
Are you an idiot? Loomis explains his head construction step by step so any beginner can follow it. At no point does he leave out an unexplained step.
>>2436660
>head construction
Kek, look at this faggot
OP is an artist he does not work with construction
Should have bought the Loomis book.
Goldfinger is great at anatomy, but he explains absolutely no technique.
>people actually use memestruction
I bet you use multiple layers too faggots.
>>2436752
Have fun not making it.
>>2436997
no spark