Criticize Hitler's Paintings
>>2433629
PHOTOCOPIER
weve done this thread before fuck off seriously
Does someone have that "Oh, it's this thread again?"
Looking at these paintings I can surely say that Hitler did nothing wrong.
he did nothing wrong
Better than most people, but not anything people would care about except
>oh but its by Hitler!
Better than 90% of /ic/
They're technically sound, I like the detailing. But I don't find them particularly imaginative or notable.
To think.
WW2 could've been prevented if Hitler was accepted into artschool.
>>2433704
How ironic that now pretty much anyone gets
accepted to non-atelier schools
>>2434034
They learned their lesson.
>>2433704
Goes to show that artists are the most dangerous people in the world and you better not piss them of.
>>2433704
ww2 wouldve sparked eventually with everyone stockpilling weapons. maybe less dead jews though.
>>2433661
So /ic/ is literally worse than Hitler.
>>2433683
>I think this one is genuinely nice.
I agree. A lot of the others have noticeably odd windows. Do you think anyone would realise the artist if I hung this up in my room. (Im not a neo-Nazi or anything, just have shit humour)
>>2434203
Nah, 6 million of them were going down come hell or high water
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHzWo79dCHs
I wonder if high quality copies are available. I'd like to frame one and throw it up on the wall amongst my other art copies. I wonder if anyone would notice.
>>2433629
I'm still a beginner but honestly the perspective in most of his paintings bother me. There's always something off about it. The worse part is it could've easily be avoided each time if he bothered spending some more time on the construction before going further in but nope.
Kind of how lost WW2 in the end.
>>2434210
kek
>>2434342
Everything is off if you draw the perspective. Oh well, had he lived in our time he'd just be another /ic/ shitposter.
It's pretty good stuff but the standards for observational artwork was incredibly high back then since art was a more widespread hobby than it is today. His perspective is off sometimes and his human figures are lacking but nothing that couldn't be fixed with a few years intensive practice. Overall he had the potential to become a pro.
>>2434376
I would love to see Hitler Shitpost on /pol/.
>>2434411
Even better knowing he'd most likely be blamed of being a jew for his lack of support of Russia.
clearly lacking fundamentals.
Too bad the art world moved on to abstraction and "degenerative art" already. Hitler was comfy postcard tier.
>>2433704
To think.
Idiots still believe in Great Man theory to this day.
LOOMIS
>>2434437
Yeah.
Anybody knows if the Führer needed Loomis?
Can't find any human study by him.
>>2433704
Germany would've still went to war eventually.
Or maybe things would've been ever worse without Hitler, you can't tell. See how much Russians died in WW2? What if they hadn't? What if Russia invaded all of Europe? Ever played Red Alert?
I remember hitler didn't get in because he had mistakes in his perspective in his portfolio work.
not sure if this is true
Hitler's paintings aren't that bad at all, they usually just have some problems with perspective and size.
If he could have resolved those issues, he probably could have been an above average painter. He probably could have combined it with being a writer (the diminished amount of frustration would probably have softened some of his positions on world affairs) and he would have had a simple life, dying at the age of 86 in Frankfurt as a celebrated author who saw the big collapse of the Soviet Union in 1943 coming.
>>2434533
I thought it was more about the fact that the school he was applying to has a high regard to figure drawing, and that his portfolio lacked these. He was praised for his architecture drawing though.
>doesn't draw real people
>draws disney characters
>>2433646
>>2434672
damn thats a sexy dwarf
