Made this about a year ago. I'm hoping to get some feedback/critique on it.
Woefully ordinary.
>>2433360
>Made this about a year ago
go fuck yourself loser.
Wood looks like plastic but other than that it's pretty cool.
>>2433451
Also, try not to do photorealism, there's no point in it, no depth. It's not art.
>he thinks photorealism is a legitimate art form
My 3 year old can make modern art, but even my printer could make this.
god i hate this board. its become hollow, nothing but shitposting and jealous digifags
>>2433498
Don't worry, bro, it's just a xerox machine
they don't have feelings
>>2433360
now do it from memory or draw and design a wizard from imagination
Well it sure shows your level in charcoal use. it's great to be able to do photorealism, but like many anons said, the only thing respectable here is your technical skills, and that's all. It shows no personality, no interest, no imagination. What would be crazy af is if you could make super realistic pictures in this manner but something coming from your mind, not from a movie.
>>2433525
It was an attempt at it, shut the fuck up you pretentious faggot
>>2433525
Shitty photorealism is still photorealism
He asked for critique and all you whine about is how photo realism isn't real art, how fucking pretentious can you get? Just because it's not real art doesn't mean it's not a very good way of training technique, he asked for critique to improve probably. Shaming someone for using photo realism is fucking retarded.
Next time do it in a different medium because any portrait done in pencil or charcoal will inevitably attract people like this
>>2433452
>>2433500
>>2433506
>>2433489
If you'd just done it in oils they'd be sucking your dick, OP.
>>2433593
First a xerox machine, now a projector, what's up next?
>>2433602
>>2433581
He still posted a year old drawing and made his own thread, he deserves it.
more like gandalf the gay
>>2433602
Are you..
Sam
Who went to vths?
Hard to say. Got a larger image?
